• notsure@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    73
    ·
    17 hours ago

    a friend once got me a job interview with his company. he listened into the interview, and i could hear him audibly gasp when the interviewer asked, “why do you want to work for us?”. I replied plainly, “To make a living so that I may pursue my real goals.” I didn’t get the job…

    • Jrockwar@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      55
      ·
      edit-2
      16 hours ago

      I’m not technically NT but I have ADHD and I don’t have problems picking up this sort of neurotypical social cues.

      When I interview people myself, I’m extra wary of catering to ND people, and for questions like this, I phrase them very carefully to mean what I want to ask:

      “Why do you want to work for us? I’m sure there were other jobs out there that would result in a salary, but what made you apply for this one specifically?”

      I make clear in the conversation that I want to know their motivation, their alignment to the specific role, and not the fact that they need money to live. I already know that! So I tailor the questions to give me exactly what I need even if the person is, say, autistic and takes things in the most literal way.

      This post has, however, made me realise that in the job posting I have open right now, I’m going to add a note in the vein of “this is a wishlist of all the things the ideal candidate would have, but we acknowledge nobody is ever a 100% perfect match - feel free to apply even if you only meet some of the criteria as you might be more qualified than most applicants”.

      • wjrii@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        15 hours ago

        I have always appreciated the listings that divide the list between the “must haves,” even soft ones (e.g. 4yr degree, knowledge of X tool, Y years of experience, solid communication skills), and “our ideal candidate will have most of the following” (e.g. Y+3 years of experience, prior role in management, knowledge of Z regulation).

        • tyler@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          15 hours ago

          The 4 year degree one is still never a must have. The only things that are true must haves are certifications for federally regulated jobs, like requiring a PE.

          • wjrii@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            14 hours ago

            There are things they actually care about enough to throw out your resume on pre-screen though. That’s de facto required for that particular job.

    • Abnorc@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 hours ago

      I see what you mean, but you have to read in between the lines a little bit. When they ask that question, they want to know why you’d rather work for them than anyone else hiring in that space.

      Your answer makes it sound like you have zero interest in the company. I’m sure that you’d rather work for them than a myriad of other places if you actually applied. Think of why that is and focus on the positives. It’s not lying unless you literally had zero reason to work there as opposed to anywhere else.

      • notsure@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Oh? I am not supposed to take a question at face value? I need some form of, wink wink, unspoken knowledge of human interaction that was not specified in the job offer? jfc

        • ElegantBiscuit@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          You’re supposed to lie. Because everyone who is not a true believer in the cause - of the product, the company, the industry, the economy, capitalism, whatever it may be, is also lying. Because the whole system depends on everyone going along with it, otherwise it all falls apart. That you have to slave away at your shitty job with shitty managers so that one day you can become the manager and be shitty because it happened to you, all in service of the exploitation of natural resources and people and society to make line go up and make the people who managed to step on the most amount people on their way to the top that much richer.