• ricecake@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    67
    ·
    12 hours ago

    On the one hand, Carlson being against it makes me assume that it’s probably a good thing, but on the other I’m usually pretty against the use of landmines because they have a strong tendency to sit around for a long time and maim random civilians.

    But if he said the sky was blue I’d have to go check for myself.

    • Drusas@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      44
      ·
      11 hours ago

      The landmines that Biden approved are battery powered. While they are still indiscriminate killing machines, they will self-neutralize rather than remain dangerous for decades to come.

    • cogman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Yup.

      I think Biden is wrong for the reasons you lay out. It won’t just be the Russians that suffer from mining.

      WWII ordinances still get pulled up pretty regularly in France.

      • Drusas@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        11 hours ago

        World War II ordinances didn’t rely on batteries and so remain(ed) dangerous for far longer.

        • cogman@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          10 hours ago

          These are still explosive. While the triggering mechanism may go bad after the battery dies, are the explosive chemicals neutralized? What happens on a shock to the device? For example, if it’s crushed by a vehicle or hit by a plow blade?

          I can grant that these are probably safer than yesteryear’s model, but I also think you are still setting up bobbytraps that are potentially dangerous for decades.

          • Strykker@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            7 hours ago

            Most explosives are chemically and physically stable like c4. Driving over them isn’t going to set them off, nor is hitting them with any kind of blunt force.

      • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 hours ago

        I mean they’re being invaded, and by Russia out of all countries. Just like their use of cluster ammunition, they probably decided it’s worth the risk.

    • Catoblepas
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Good thing land mines can distinguish between Ukrainians and Russians I guess?

      • cogman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        12 hours ago

        And a child years after the war ends.

        Landmines were internationally banned for a reason.

        • Tiefling IRL
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          25
          ·
          edit-2
          12 hours ago

          Iirc, these have an expiration date

          Not that it fully absolves them, but better than the ones that go boom 30 years after the fact