• Everett@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    154
    ·
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    Everyone knows you need to pay for YouTube Premium-Pro-Plus if you don’t want to see ads. Only 69.99 per month week.

  • Shard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    143
    ·
    11 days ago

    Alright where are all the YouTube premium apologetics that keep appearing everytime someone discusses any sort of Ad-blocker?! What do you guys have to say now?!

    • chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      81
      ·
      11 days ago

      No ads so far here but I definitely will cancel Premium if I start seeing ads. That’s literally the only thing I’m paying for.

    • Nalivai@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      11 days ago

      I’m continuing apologising for premium exclusively because it pays creators more, and more consistently. I never go on the internet without all the adblocks possible, the sight of an add makes me irrationally angry. I’m still paying for premium

        • rocketpoweredredneck@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          11 days ago

          If i paid money to every the patreon of every content creator that I want to support, it’d be a lot more money than youtube premium. Better believe ill be cancelling premium the very first ad I see though.

        • olsplasher@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          10 days ago

          Doesn’t Patreon then take a cut? What’s the difference? (Fee % might, haven’t checked to be fair)

          I’m supporting one creator via Patreon and got merch from another one (and have tried channel memberships), however this doesn’t really scale.

          • merch is only really great when one needs whatever is offered anyways
          • Patreon is nice, but requires explicit effort and regular payments for each channel

          So from that perspective, having creators being payed more per-view is actually a nice, convenient effect and will cover channels that might otherwise get nothing. I’d like to have something like this for the general internet - pay some monthly fee, no more ads and websites, news sites etc all get some share (that is ultimatively more than what the ads would’ve given them in the first place).

    • frigidaphelion@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      11 days ago

      I have a youtube premium account. Used to just use u-block but my computer is non-functional and I now primarily consume media on my ipad so I got a subscription. So far I have not had any ads. Working on getting a new pc and coming back to the light

      • BlemboTheThird@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        11 days ago

        You can download Firefox and install Ublock on the mobile app, then just go to YouTube.com. That’s how I usually do it on my android phone anyway; I assume it works for iOS too

        • don@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          11 days ago

          It does, I use adblocks, Untrap, DeArrow, and SponsorBlock on iOS safari, and I don’t see shit other than the video itself.

        • Synapse@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          11 days ago

          Last time I tried, I couldn’t install add-ons on Firefox on the iPad. Because Firefox on iPad is just safari with a coat of paint.

            • Synapse@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 days ago

              I wouldn’t mind so much is uBlock Origin was available for safari, but it’s not, so I will have to go for one of the dodgy knockoffs…

        • frigidaphelion@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 days ago

          I would absolutely love to do this but I am nearly tech illiterate. I use firefox already and poked around on ublock origin’s site but I dont know how to install extensions or whatever on ipad and I didnt see anything obvious in the settings on firefox. Any recommendations?

    • CptEnder@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      11 days ago

      Uhh I don’t care who doesn’t pay for YTP or just blocks them, seems like an odd thing to care about?

      I do have grandfathered $7/mo GPM (YTM) which comes with free YTP and I’ve yet to see ads at all. I don’t even get ads on my linked gaming YT account. This kinda seems like misinformation?

      If you think paying $10+ for Spotify instead of $7 YTM+YTP then yes, you are a fucking idiot.

      • Randelung@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        11 days ago

        I had GPM and never got YTP. Switched o Tidal becuse YTM keeps repeating songs. I’ve had a song go 6 times in sequence.

        So, shitty product, shitty support (see blackmail video claims), shitty creator compensation. Goodbye Google.

        • waddle_dee@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 days ago

          This is exactly why I just switched to Tidal. And I had the grandfathered price. It’s just not worth it for a shitty product.

    • Caboose12000@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      10 days ago

      okay the adderall is kicking in so, sorry if this is a massive wall of text, but since you asked, adblockers are great, I never use the web without one when I can, but ads are only one part of why i pay for YouTube.

      here are all my reasons:

      • easy adless YouTube on non-android smart TV
      • YouTube music (dont have to pay for Spotify)
      • auto background video downloading to save on mobile data when I leave the house
      • supports more creators (albeit in smaller amounts) than I could ever afford to support via patreon or merch (and supports them directly proportionally to how much I watch thier content, so I never risk paying a creator that ive lost interest in or forgetting to add a creator’s patreon)

      I would never try to convince someone else to pay for YouTube, it’s defintily not for everyone, especially when a decent adblocker will satisfy most people. But for some people like me, it just makes sense, and I don’t understand why some people get so mad to learn I’m paying for it.

      Google is a gross company for sure, hell except for YouTube ive pretty much completly degoogled my life. I can use Plex for movies and shows, Proton for mail and calandar, magic earth for GPS, Firefox and DDG for search, etc. but there isnt a good replacement for YouTube especially since its one of my main hobbies. peertube and other video hosting sites really just dont compare for my usecase

      ofc I think its shitty that theyre trialing showing ads to premium users in Germany, but honestly that would barely affect me if it was happening where I live. I use adblockers everywhere except my TV, so most of the time it’d be impossible for me to see an ad whether YouTube tried to serve me one or not.

      if you were genuinly asking what people who pay for YouTube have to say about this, I hope that answered your question

      • Shard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 days ago

        I appreciate your nuanced answer. That’s something a lot of “why not just pay for YouTube premium” guys don’t

        You raised good points and if you’re happy to pay for the convenience, I’m not going to fight you on that.

        While I don’t fully agree with paying for a service that doesn’t listen to their customers(bring back dislikes), I can still see where you’re coming from.

        • Caboose12000@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          9 days ago

          edit: sorry for the wall of text again lol

          thanks, I appreciate your response too. I wasn’t sure what to expect when I wrote it lol but this response was a pleasant surprise

          I will admit that I never really engaged with likes/dislikes, so while I was annoyed on a conceptual level when they removed dislikes it didnt really affect me. I might feel differently about paying youtube if that wasn’t the case.

          I wasn’t aware when I wrote this that there were so many people who respond to simple complaints about ads with “just buy premium”, that was a total blindspot for me. Most comments ive seen about it (before reading comments on this thread, dear god) were more similar to mine, albeit more brief.

          at risk of overgeneralizing, I think anyone who pays for YouTube /just/ for the ads (while watching mostly on PC or android), is probably an idiot. adblock is trivial to set up on those platforms and will likely soon prove to be more effective at preventing ads than paying for YouTube. its upsetting the sheer amount of people that will give money to evil corporations just to avoid having to think at all about what theyre consuming, and if thats really the loud majority of people who pay for YouTube then I can defintily understand the negative interactions ive had in the past.

          this has been an enlightening discussion for me, thanks for that!

    • JoYo@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 days ago

      I have yt premium because my view counts as 1000x an ad supported view does.

      I still end up using yt-dlp because playback in firefox is ass.

    • rumba@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      10 days ago

      Mixed truth. They carried broadcast networks that always had ads. Fox, NBC, ABC all had ads.
      Comcast would even overwrite one or two of the network ads with their own ads. A commercial break would start, some life insurance BS would start playing audio compressed all to hell so it’s twice as loud, at the end, you’d catch 5 seconds of some toy commercial and then one or two other regular network commercials.

      Premium channels like HBO didn’t have ‘ads,’ but they did have station identification and self-promotion for what’s coming to the platform in the near future. They wouldn’t break the movies up, though, only in between. A few standouts didn’t start with ads like Nickelodeon, but eventually got them.

      Saturday cartoons on USA and TNT certainly had ads from day one.

    • Kyrgizion@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 days ago

      Our national tv channel is lawfully barred from running commercials.

      They just changed the definition of ads they run to “messages of commercial importance” or some dumb shit like that. And just like that, ads on the national channel are suddenly a-ok

      • stinerman [Ohio]@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 days ago

        PBS here has ads. They are short, but there are ads nonetheless. This is over and above the ads for their own shows that will be on the channel at a later date.

    • Breve@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 days ago

      It’s convenient timing that Google Chrome is removing support for ad blocking plugins like uBlock right as Premium sneaks ads back in… 🙄

  • repungnant_canary@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    60
    ·
    edit-2
    11 days ago

    Premium+ coming in 2026 for truly ad-free experience. Premium++ coming in 2028 for truly truly ad-free experience. Premium+++ coming in 2030 for truly truly truly ad-free experience.

        • Starbuncle@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          9 days ago

          I can’t wait until computers and compression algorithms advance to the point where YouTube competitors become commercially viable!

          Just kidding, YT will probably just blackmail their content creators into only posting on their platform and nowhere else to maintain their monopoly.

          • KneeTitts@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 days ago

            can’t wait until computers and compression algorithms advance to the point where YouTube competitors become commercially viable

            hell just going back to regular cable is now viable for me, I might see less ads!

            #re-attachingTheCord

    • CaptainBlagbird@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 days ago

      Premium# coming in 2032 for truly truly truly ad-free experience.
      Premium#+ coming in 2034 for truly truly truly ad-free experience.

  • Aido@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    The guy who took this screenshot and posted it to Reddit likely has Premium Lite, which still shows ads on music videos. The title of the video is probably cut out to hide it.

  • db2@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    11 days ago

    Yeah, anyone who didn’t see this coming hasn’t been paying attention.

    • Daveyborn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 days ago

      To be fair google could have one of those days since workplace accident boards but for bad youtube decisions.

      I’d be surprised if it hit 3 digits.

    • Kit
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      46
      ·
      11 days ago

      Only in Germany in a test of a lower Premium plan so far.

        • sepiroth154@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          41
          ·
          11 days ago

          You get amazing features like: background play (which is more of an annoyance), remember where i left off (which doesnt work whatsoever, even 5 years after it was first released), download video’s to watch offline (you need to remember to download them first or hope that YouTube’s recommendation algoritm didnt pick videos you’ve already wachted) oh, and you can get a slightly higher bitrate for 1080p. So basically it loses all value.

        • moriquende@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          11 days ago

          The other replies are incorrect, the lower tier premium actually has no ads on most videos. When you subscribe, they explicitly let you know music videos will play ads, probably so this plan is not eating away profits of YouTube music.

        • smb@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 days ago

          they get even more revenue from other peoples contributions.

          thats the whole point not more, not less.

          so there is no point for “you” to pay them anything.

          did you as a “premium customer” thought to be “the customer”? really? remember how little you personally pay for the service. it is mainly the ad companies who are youtubes “customers”. when you pay them for something, you only increase yt’s revenue, not more, not less, but you are not “the customer”, you are the product ;-)

      • renzev@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        10 days ago

        From what I understand, they’re already getting paid pennies by youtube, which is why many of them constantly shill for patreon/nebula/curiositystream/whatever on top of sponsored content. So youtube is shit for the creators, shit for the consumers, and a net loss for google. It’s the same non-business model as food delivery apps: nobody profits, yet it still somehow keeps going because modern economics is make-believe.

      • bstix@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 days ago

        There are alternatives for the people who make money off the YouTube.

        The Youtubers who do get paid enough to make a living from YouTube also make production quality content and have great gear and staff. They might as well sell their production to any other streaming service.

        Something like Veritasium might as well be on Netflix as YouTube. Mr.Beast would fit in on Mtv…

        • whotookkarl@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          9 days ago

          Those both require subscriptions for access though instead of offering an ad based tier so that already excludes a majority of viewers from being able to move over from yt and those producers are unlikely to abandon their current audiences for a possibly bigger audience under a different corporation. I think that’s going to be necessary for a majority of viewers and producers to switch to another A/V distribution platform. If Netflix or MTV had an ad-only based tier and released apps for phones, Roku, browser, etc and allowed producer uploads then I suspect they could take a big chunk of Google’s yt viewership and profits.

  • umbraroze@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    11 days ago

    Fun thing, I don’t want to get YouTube Premium because YouTube has a huge bunch of bugs and glitches and crap UI design and since they’re the only service in the niche there’s been no indication they’ll ever fix their shit.

    I didn’t care about YouTube Music, so losing ads on stock YouTube apps was literally the only reason I was even considering getting Premium.

    But if it doesn’t even do the one job…?

    • thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      10 days ago

      VPN to a country with a lower cost, and sign up there. It used to be Turkey and India, where you could get a Family Plan for like $2/mo - but they’ve cracked down a bit on it.

      We use YT for so much in our ‘household’ that it made sense to pool together and get Premium, and honestly it feels good having ~5 people who consume a tonne of content ad-free for nearly no cost while still supporting our preferred content creators.

      • DJDarren@thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        10 days ago

        They’ve brought the hammer down on this. I was happily ‘traveling to Ukraine’ with my Apple TV to watch YouTube without ads for the equivalent of around £3 a month for over a year. Last month they canned our Premium.

        I use yt-dlp to download my subs into a Plex folder now. Fuck ‘em.

    • Glitterbomb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      10 days ago

      I’ve had some hideous collection of ABP, ublock, and some extension that hides all shorts all on chrome and I’ve somehow completely dodged all the drama in the past year. I’ve never had to manually update or fiddle with any settings. I’ve seen all the crap everyone else is getting, and I constantly think its right around the corner, but nothing. Sometimes the page loads funny and just shows a black rectangle, and i think welp they finally got to me, but an immediate refresh always fixes it. Maybe one day I’ll have to deal with it

      • ManOMorphos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 days ago

        I’ve dodged nearly everything with only Firefox + Ublock + Ghostery. The most I ever got was maybe one warning page on YouTube and never seen anything about it again.

    • KneeTitts@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 days ago

      Me on my home lab Invidious instance: What are “ads”?

      Me on my firestick with smarttube: What are “ads”?

  • Zement@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    10 days ago

    People who use premium should organize to vow to publicly shame and boycott any company putting adds in their premium plan.

    Like anti commercials.

  • GrymEdm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    11 days ago

    Part 1: All of history from corporations becoming a thing to present day.

    Part 2: The results of heartless corporate policy for the foreseeable future.

    • higgsboson@dubvee.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      11 days ago

      All of history from corporations becoming a thing to present day.

      Corporations are people. The problem is that people are selfish greedy assholes.