Until the rule is removed, any new posts about US politics will be removed.

        • Taffer [they/she]@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          29 minutes ago

          Tbh I’m thinking about heading back to .world. I joined .ee cos I thought the memes and edgy shit from hexbear were funny and wanted to keep seeing it without losing most of lemmy. But watching how hexbear is currently acting, I’m running out of reasons to put up with how some .ee folks behave.

  • oxjox@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    149
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    How the fuck is Lemmy supposed to serve as an open alternative to corporate controlled social media when the mods ban discussing one of the most impactful events of the day? You should be begging people to talk about politics here. Unsubbed. EDIT: AND BLOCKED. If I wanted to hang out in a fascist community I’d join twitter.

        • Summzashi@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Boohoo I’ll believe that when it happens. In the meanwhile there’s literally nothing I can do about it. Instead of cry and doompost on the internet I’d rather focus on things that matter and keep a positive outlook.

          Go away.

    • Karmmah@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      85
      ·
      12 hours ago

      By giving people the opportunity to host their own instances and create their own communities with rules they like. This however does not mean that everything should be allowed everywhere. Actually this means that everywhere you go people make their own rules and if you dont like them, go somewhere else or create your own community.

      • CaptainBlagbird@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        9 hours ago

        This however is the main problem of social media in general. It creates circles of like-minded people where it is really easy to reject “other” thoughts and accept “our” ideas without much questioning. This is less a problem for people who are trained in critical thinking, but might be dangerous for more unstable people.

        I’m just saying that a mix of different views is always good to some degree. Whether/how this should be done on Lemmy is a different thing.

        • Karmmah@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Absolutely. If this rule was a permanent rule I don’t think so many people would defend it. However from experience (reddit for example) I think many people know that US politics has the ability to claim and overrun just about every space on the “western” internet. This is not something that really creates value for many people especially those that don’t live in the US and I think this ruling is trying to prevent that.

      • oxjox@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Ridiculous copy/paste reply. You’re not making a good case for people leaving corporate media for Lemmy. You’re encouraging them to stay where they are.

        • Karmmah@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          32
          ·
          11 hours ago

          What’s wrong about it though? The freedom lies in the ability to create your own community that is not regulated by one company/organisation owning the platform. You can go to the place where you agree with the rules and you don’t have to live under the rules of someone you don’t like.

          • FLemmingO@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            10 hours ago

            They’re just butthurt that they’re not being allowed to spew their hot takes all over this community as a captive audience that isn’t interested.

            • Chozo@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              9 hours ago

              Nobody was doing that here, though. Have you even seen this community? It’s super inactive to begin with.

          • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 hours ago

            What’s wrong is fracturing. Lemmy is not so massive that it can sustain niche communities for every little topic.

        • Danitos@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Not every sub has to revolve around US elections all day/weeks/months long. That has nothing to do with corporate media.

          • oxjox@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 hours ago

            If some other country had a historic election, I would HOPE to see open dialog spread in places like this for people to express themselves. Why ban an internationally relevant discussion when people have the choice to be members of the community. How about - if you don’t like it, you can leave.

            • Danitos@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              7 hours ago

              But there are places for the discussion to be made. Lemmy as a whole did not ban the elections discussion, just this one specific sub. In fact, you’ll see basically every single sub of Lemmy discussing it.

              This is a temporary rule for 1 single community.

    • SendPicsofSandwiches@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Because you can go to literally any instance and create a community just for political drivel or even just go to the hundreds of other communities already dedicated to exactly that.

    • aard@kyu.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Because we’re glad it is finally over after having deal with your election bullshit for the last half year? We made contingency plans for a trump win, so we acknowledged his win this morning, hope the planning is sufficient, and finally move on to something else.

    • Artyom@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Mods are people of the community too. If you don’t like them, you can make your own community.

      • Chozo@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 hours ago

        That’s a bad take. The mods made the choice to moderate a general-purpose community in the first place. If they want a more narrowly-focused community, they should make one.

  • Karmmah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    76
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Instead of complaining can someone who dislikes this decision please just create a community like “AskLemmyUS”, post a link here so people can find it and get on with it?

  • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    12 hours ago

    We just had probably the most consequential election of our life and you want to ban discussion? Jeezus.

  • Littux@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    12 hours ago

    I came here since I was fed up with the politics on Reddit.

    I was pretty disappointed when I saw the same thing happening here. So thanks!

  • mesamune@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    11 hours ago

    We get 10ish posts here a day… I guess if you want less activity here good job you win. I hate these temp rules in communities.

  • SavvyWolf@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Thank you! Could this be permanent? People can use an AskLemmyPolitics community if they really need to.

  • demesisx@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    Doubling down on the censorship of inconvenient truths will surely help after your whole instance demonstrated the folly in censoring inconvenient truths. /s

    Remember: if you think you have to censor the truth about your supposed left wing candidate of choice, they’re probably NOT actually very leftist at all and you’re doing fascist shit directly for a fascist.

    If you refuse to allow people to speak the truth, you’re not even doing a decent job, pretending to be one of the “ good guys”.

    • oldfart@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 hours ago

      It’s not inconvenient truth, it’s white noise for the rest of the world

      • demesisx@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        8 hours ago

        White noise that sends missiles and bombs to kill millions around the world. It’s very dangerous white noise is it not?

        If the rest of the world is educated on our sham political system then maybe people like you can educate the identity politics dupes that I have to be censored by when I point to rampant corporatism in an impotent attempt to wriggle my way out of this wage slave trap.

        For example, here’s an image I love to point to that shows why the US is so stupidly tribalist: tribalism in one graphic

        It shows what needs to be done to try and fix this shithole country.

        • oldfart@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          7 hours ago

          The rest of the world is already overeducated on US politics. I don’t know the electoral system of my neighboring countries even though that’s just as important, if not more. But US politics is shoved down everyone’s throats. Too much! Handle your internal shit internally and don’t spill the sewage all over the internet.