• Clbull@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    79
    ·
    edit-2
    15 days ago

    Called it, using Allan Lichtman’s own 13 keys principle (in ways that he himself overlooked), and on a heavily downvoted comment.

    Where I was wrong was with how narrow the result would he. It wasn’t even Gore v Bush levels of close unlike when Lichtman’s 13 keys prediction previously failed. Kamala lost the popular vote to a convicted felon that tried to usurp democracy and is the reason why abortion is no longer a federal right. The Republicans spent the last few weeks crapping on Haitians and Puerto Ricans, yet won some districts with large Latino populations.

    This is what happens when Democrats ignore their voter base and choose a cabal of unpopular and uncharismatic candidates to carry the torch. The bar is now so low that we need James Cameron to venture out into the Mariana Trench and lift it back up again…

    • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      70
      ·
      edit-2
      15 days ago

      Harris was popular when she first announced. She then proceeded to run to the cold dead embrace of the Biden campaign.

      Progressive policy is more popular than any candidate, if they focused on rent control, free healthcare, free childcare, free college and other immediate, material improvements to people’s conditions, they’d have won in a landslide. Instead they abandoned the rest of the country to pursue the <10% of republicans who weren’t in the bag for Trump.

      • FutileRecipe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        48
        ·
        15 days ago

        Harris was popular when she first announced.

        I don’t think she was popular when first announced, rather the fact that not-Biden was popular.

      • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        15 days ago

        Instead they abandoned the rest of the country to pursue the <10% of republicans who weren’t in the bag for Trump.

        YES! I held my nose and voted for her, she turned her back on everything that looked like hope and change during her campaign. Her reaction to R looking weak was to jump to the right, somehow.

        Having said that, anyone who needed to be wooed to not vote for Trump was a lost cause, but she literally turned away from every sort of policy decision that excites Democrats.

        • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          15 days ago

          That’s bizarre, were people confused by the wording? Was there a media blitz by local landlords? More people are renters than landlords so obviously the majority doesn’t want rent to be higher.

          • Not_mikey@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            15 days ago

            There was a massive media campaign against it. Every other political ad on tv was against it .

            Progressive policies are popular until billionaires spend millions of dollars convincing people that the world will end if we help poor people a bit.

            • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              15 days ago

              That’s true, we need a strategy to deal with the media.

              The same thing could be observed when even the most right-wing democrats in 2020 were saying we need police reform, and in 2022, they were all talking about a made-up crime wave, or how every election until now, reliable dem voters understood immigration is a net positive for society, but suddenly they’re talking about how Kamala is going to secure the border

    • Elbow@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      15 days ago

      I think inflation is the biggest part of why Trump won. People wrongly blamed Biden for it. I guess we’ll just have to learn some lessons again.

    • coyootje@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      15 days ago

      Is there any chance that shit was rigged this time around? As an outsider it’s honestly just crazy to me that the difference can be so huge, almost unimaginable.

      • Saleh@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        15 days ago

        Or it goes to show how much of a bubble we have here and how skewed the reporting in other countries is. So far there is absolutely no indication that it would be rigged and frankly the disconnect of the liberal online bubbles es emblematic for the disconnect of the Dem party from the people.

      • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        15 days ago

        Even if it were - what are we gonna do about it? After shitting all over the place with their BS for the past four years, claiming an election is stolen has risen to “jet fuel can’t melt steel beams” levels.

        There would need to be a 4k video of Trump and cronies detailing exactly how they were going to do it, and every detail would need to be easily verified, and even then I’m not sure it would get enough traction to matter.

      • djsoren19@yiffit.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        15 days ago

        I don’t really think so, I think the Trump campaign is as surprised as the rest of us. Their plan to steal the election hinged on them calling the results into question and contesting the whole thing through the Trump-friendly Supreme Court.

        I wonder if any of them are disappointed. They were planning for a coup, but they were given power freely.

      • FutileRecipe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        15 days ago

        Is there any chance that shit was rigged this time around?

        There’s always a chance of almost anything, but it is very slim (conspiracy theory) with no evidence to support it:

        “Importantly, we have no evidence of any malicious activity that had a material impact on the security or integrity of our election infrastructure,” per the U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) Director Jen Easterly.

        Source: https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/news/statement-cisa-director-easterly-security-2024-elections