• latenightnoir@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    13 days ago

    If I remember correctly, one such example is the lightbulb. Some of the earliest designs were centered around using longer-lasting filaments than their contemporary counterparts, which meant considerably increased lifespan.

    • QuarterSwede@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      13 days ago

      They still made them too. 130V bulbs / garage bulbs / heavy duty bulbs all lasted far longer on 120V because the filament was thicker. They basically never went out.

    • EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      12 days ago

      There is a trade-off between efficiency and durability on incandescent light bulbs. They did sell bulbs that lasted longer, but those had lower lumen/watt.

      For generic bulbs, the cost of electricity was significantly greater than the cost of the bulb. It was cheaper to replace bulbs more frequently than to waste electricity.

    • hperrin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      12 days ago

      Sure, but those kinds of lights are very dim. You can just use a dimmer bulb set to very low if you want that kind of longevity.

      • joelfromaus@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        edit-2
        12 days ago

        Technology connections did a video on it. Basically the lights which lasted forever either; sucked at giving light and/or sucked at sucking power.

        Light manufacturers got together and made a standard which was a sweet spot of power efficiency, longevity and light output. Unfortunately, being decent at all three meant no longer sucking at two to boost longevity.