• bastion@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        40
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        He followed legal advice from lawyers and removed some russians from being kernel maintainers to comply with sanctions.

        • peppers_ghost@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          5 hours ago

          People are more mad about how he did it rather than just the action he took. If he just explained why without being a prick nobody would care.

          • Zetta@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            54 minutes ago

            “Without being a prick” Dawg being a prick is his primary way communication, power to him

            • Norah - She/They
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              ·
              edit-2
              3 hours ago

              No, I also found the way he handled it really distasteful. Even before his response, just generally the way the whole thing was attempted under a veil wasn’t great. The actions taken should have been transparent from the start.

              I do agree that it shouldn’t be polluting this thread like this though.

            • peppers_ghost@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              4 hours ago

              What is the point of this comment? Linus was childish as hell in the email chain and started a bunch of drama for literally no reason. I’m not mad as much as I am embarrassed to be a part of the Linux community when things like this happen.

          • Nibodhika@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 hour ago

            Yes, only those with ties to the war, e.g. people who work for companies that develop software used on Russian drones.

            But people are angry that this wasn’t explained from the beginning.

          • ghen@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 hour ago

            How would you even know what ties a person has when the problem is government level security. Besides, Russia doesn’t exactly work on government payrolls anyway, it’s more about working in subsidiary companies owned by the oligarchs who are able to skirt the law effectively becoming the government in the process. It’s totally foreign to Western style government, there is nothing like it in the world

      • argarath@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        He took the authorization for a bunch of Russians from being able to keep working on the Linux stuff. I’m def not remembering everything and I’d suggest you searching any news about it, it’s an interesting read

  • MalReynolds@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    251
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Someone just removed many lifetimes of CO2 emissions with a couple of lines of code.

    Shame that usage will just expand to fill the gap. Thanks late stage capitalism. Degrowth.

    • sweetpotato@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      101
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Wasn’t expecting this under a random unrelated post. A very welcome comment nonetheless.

      Never forget that the exponential boom of renewable energy tech the last 20 years has entirely served as additional energy, not as replacement of fossil fuels.

        • sweetpotato@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 hour ago

          Why would you assume I am talking about Europe which accounts for 1/10 of the global energy consumption and why would I be talking the continent that has mostly outsourced its heavy industry to third world countries? Why would you assume this?

          https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/global-primary-energy?time=2000..latest

          Here’s your source. Here’s your total energy consumption. It couldn’t have been that hard to look at our world in data right? How can you be so absolutely wrong about data in plain sight while being confident about it? Do you have an agenda?

          • azertyfun@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 hour ago

            Oh god, I forgot you .ml fuckmuppets are incapable of maintaining a civil tone.

            Europe is a single market. While it does import goods from elsewhere (namely Asia), from what I remember that does not nearly make up for the overall downwards trend of consumption & emissions.

            Developing countries are increasing their emissions as they increase their purchasing power. While there is certainly a debate to be held over the details of that, I do not see how that invalidates my point that renewables don’t just serve to increase overall power consumption.

            However if you’re thinking of replying with the same lip you just gave me I suggest instead of responding to my comment, you take your teenage attitude and shove it somewhere the sun don’t shine.

      • oo1@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Unexpected but entirely welcome.

        People do forget this all too often.

        Cheaper stuff, use more , value less.

  • dustycups@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    16 hours ago

    The discussion on LKML was so civilised compared to this one.
    I wonder what the phoronix one is like…

    • oldfart@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      63
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Yeah, one man did hours of profiling and the other made the patch more elegant lol

      • bluewing@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Kind of like the butcher who got his hands dirty cutting a steak and then a Michelin star chef cooking it for you.

        One got his hands bloody. The other made it delectable for you to eat.

        Which is more important to the process?

    • SuperSpruce@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      This has to be a record for the most downvoted comment on Lemmy, holy moly. This is a huge absolute margin even for reddit.

      • clutchtwopointzero@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        17 hours ago

        He would only escape if he was a presidential candidate or a multi billionaire.

        Since he is neither and he works on US soil, then the law came after him. You would cave in, if in similar circumstances.

      • GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        I already explained my point about it. A lot of companies rebased themselves when political issues occured. The Linux Foundation could easily do that. It’s just racism.

        • winterayars@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          14 hours ago

          “A lot of companies” completely left the sphere of influence of basically any country except Russia? Doubt.

          I know the company i work for has to take similar steps when the sanctions went into effect, for example. Same as almost everyone.

        • Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          154
          ·
          1 day ago

          Counter argument: The maintainers could “easily” relocate to a country that is not currently conducting an invasion to enlarge its territory.

        • uis@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          17 hours ago

          …it’s not. It is stupid, it stalls mainlining of Baikal, but it is not a racism.

        • Hemuphone@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          160
          ·
          1 day ago

          Sanctions against a country/nation that is attacking another sovereign nation are not “racist”. Russia could easily stop their war to start getting rid of the sanctions.

          • Mihies@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            24 hours ago

            It depends, though. There are western and other countries invading and much worse, but there are no sanctions. It could be racism, interests or both that only a certain country is targeted with sanctions.

            • bastion@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              6 hours ago

              Then other countries should make sanctions on the US where it masters to them to do so.

            • Hemuphone@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              41
              ·
              22 hours ago

              There should be sanctions on every country invading. Its not rocket science. It’s crazy to say that russia is being sanctioned for racist reasons. They are literally attacking an European nation. Makes sense that other European countries sanction them, no?

              • Mihies@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                11 hours ago

                Yes, there should be sanctions against any country doing that and worse. But there aren’t. Why not? I see a lot of downvotes and no explanations. As per Europe, aren’t we talking mostly about US, since Linux is trying to follow their sanctions? Also even Europe is divided about who the enemy is, like pesky Hungary.

            • Hemuphone@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              33
              ·
              22 hours ago

              So your argument is that Linux foundation should relocate to… where? Sorry that was such a bad argument that I did not even consider it being one.

              Why would they relocate? To keep a few Russian maintainers? Because not relocating is “racist”? Not sure what you mean, just trying to guess.

              • bastion@feddit.nl
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                6 hours ago

                Sorry that was such a bad argument that I did not even consider it being one.

                Savage truth.

              • GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                21 hours ago

                So your argument is that Linux foundation should relocate to… where?

                Somewhere stable and neutral like Switzerland or some island. I’m not a lawyer so can’t say which country is the best for it.

                Because not relocating is “racist”?

                To some extent, yes.

                • winterayars@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  25
                  ·
                  14 hours ago

                  Switzerland is currently sanctioning Russia. Let me say that again to be clear: moving to Switzerland, the most neutral country in the world, will not prevent you from having to abide by sanctions against Russia.

          • ___@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            9 hours ago

            Do they? They could have just isolated those commits as sanctioned and added a warning. Linux hates Russians as a Finn, so didn’t need much convincing to remove them.

            I would be singing a different tune if our allies invading other countries at the moment were also sanctioned, but that’s not the case.

            As it stands, let the individuals escape the nation state punishment. They didn’t start this war, and likely don’t support it.

            • Mereo@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 hours ago

              Rationally speaking, the whole purpose of sanctions is to sanction the whole population of the country in order to get the government of the country to change it’s policies. And when it comes to sanctions, companies and entities doing business with the sanctioned countries are themselves sanctioned. So Linus had no choice but to remove the Russian contributors.

              We’re talking about a real situation, not about what would be better.

              • ___@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 hours ago

                Of course that’s how sanctions work… against nations. Linux isn’t a country, it’s not an American asset. They could have resisted. Linus chose not to.

        • BCsven@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          edit-2
          16 hours ago

          They are bound by USA sanction law, moving to another NATO country would be same sanctions against Russia

            • bastion@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              6 hours ago

              So your advice is basically “come on, guys, you can resist russian aggression in ways that don’t involve conflict, stop the sanctions and side with Russia pls”?

              No. As the instigator of this conflict, Russia can back the fuck down.

              • GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                6 hours ago

                At this point I’m sure you’re just trolling. I fully support sanctions against Russia but not against Russian people unless they were officially proven to actively support the war, especially if their actions don’t result in income to Russian Federation in taxes. I think I made it clear.

                Also Linus supports US’s terroristic acts and invasions by paying taxes to the country so it’s not necessarily any better.

    • ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      24 hours ago

      You think open source project maintainers should move to different countries because of temporary sanctions? What if they have a wife with a job and kids in school? Or delicate Lego collections that are impossible to pack? Or a side-piece?

      Take issue with the sanctions if you want but don’t take issue with people who don’t want to move their family, LEGO collections, and side-pieces.

      • winterayars@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        13 hours ago

        There are hundreds of Linux developers, including companies like Red Hat, Intel, IBM, Google, and more. You want all these people to up and move to… where? Somewhere. Russia, or a Russian ally presumably but hell if i know. Anyway you want them all to move so a handful of people working for Russian weapons manufacturing companies can keep maintaining pieces of the Linux kernel?

        This is obviously a non-serious suggestion.

      • GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        23 hours ago

        Move physically? Of course not. If it’s required to register the foundation, they could ask a maintainer from the country to register it. It’s not the cleanest of schemes but it should work. Though if Linus lives in the US now, it can still cause issues because US law system has been proven to not work and they could easily arrest him illegally if they wanted to. However in this case it’s the same as living in Russia. Both countries are terroristic.

        • Cethin@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          12 hours ago

          You can disagree with the law if you want, but breaking the law (sanctions) and being arrested is a legal arrest.

          I have tons of issues with the US legal system, but I don’t pretend like everything I agree with is legal and everything I disagree with is illegal. That would be moronic.