• Zorsith
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      55
      ·
      2 months ago

      The complete lack of printers is a huge plus.

        • Zorsith
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Havent messed with a kyocera. Worst I’ve seen was konica minolta.

          The only time I spent on a Konica minolta immediately thought to myself “there is no way this thing is meant to be configured by a human.” That shit is horrendous. It was immediately dropped the second it failed to allow a secure password due to having a disallowed character list.

          Edit: mixed up printer brands

  • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    68
    ·
    2 months ago

    The “no printers” is a positive, unless it’s a laser printer from the 2000’s.

    (Someone should make an open source laser printer.)

    • elidoz@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      it’s ironic how the worst piece of proprietary software made to trick customers is in the printers, the software straight up just lies on there being no ink

    • qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      I am devastated that I got rid of my 2000s HP LaserJet (with Ethernet). Only flaw it had was that it didn’t have a duplexer.

    • lukstru@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      I think the problem with creating a printer is that you have to have a reliable source of ink that will not sue you if you use their designs

      • frezik@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 months ago

        Toner isn’t that hard to source.

        The real issue is precision accuracy. Keeping things to 2D might sound easier than 3D, but 3D printers don’t need the level of accuracy and precision that 2D printers do. 300dpi means dots every 85 microns. A very carefully tuned FDM 3D printer can get around 50 microns, but see below for the gory details:

        https://3dprinting.stackexchange.com/questions/10349/do-3d-printers-really-reach-50-micron-0-05-mm-accuracy

        Either way, 300dpi isn’t particularly impressive for a paper printer. Usable, but there’s going to be some blockiness to text, and graphics won’t be good at all. 600 or 1200dpi is more like it. Which means we take that 85 microns and cut it in half, and maybe cut it in half again.

        If we’re talking color, than our difficulty increases 4x (because there’s four cartridges for CMYK). They all have to be aligned properly to mix the colors to get a good image. We’re also definitely headed towards 1200dpi at a minimum for good results.

        Now, an open source plotter would be interesting. Not great for text documents, but useful for diagrams.

        • GluWu@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          That’s the nice thing about laser printers, lasers are super accurate. You’re not moving any significant mass around. All you’re doing is rotating a mirror and moving that beam in a single axis. If you continuously spin the mirror then your accuracy depends on how fast you can turn the diode on and off.

    • AlataOrange
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Printers are a restricted item in most countries when it comes to manufacturing and producing due to counterfeiting, as such any open source printer you could produce would most likely run a foul of local laws due to the ability to remove anti-counterfeiting requirements.

    • Da Bald Eagul@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      2 months ago

      They probably don’t allow phones inside, because people could take pics of others. This way people van still access the internet I guess.

    • frezik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      2 months ago

      A lot of places like this don’t want you using your own devices inside. I’d guess that they’ve disabled the cameras, or at least made it difficult to send photos outside of the device?

    • cheddar@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 months ago

      So that you could write fake and gay stories on 4chan without risking dropping your personal electronic device into the jacuzzi.

  • magnetosphere@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    2 months ago

    My immature reaction is to snicker at the name “Pipeworks”. Part or my sense of humor refuses to advance beyond the 7th grade.

    • WillStealYourUsername
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 months ago

      The “yes” and “no” for app should trade colors. Who in their right mind wants a business to have an app

      • Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        I posted that as a reply, scrolled down, and see you have the exact same sentiment as me hahaha

  • abbiistabbii
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 months ago

    I actually had to look this up. You mentioned wework in Edinburgh and compare it to a gay sauna in Glasgow. Have you factored in the commuting time between going from Glasgow to Edinburgh park?