Podcasts : 2020s :: talk radio : 1990s
been thinking this quite a bit too, yeah
Is it worse than Joe Rogan, though?
I recently discovered the joe rogan remixed as a 40k trooper yt vids and it is great. (Yes i know im a year late to the party). But yes he sucks, think it was amusing he talked like he was stoned as fuck and alex jones talked like he had just snorted all the cocaine in Volendam.
Oh… oh, let’s not give it ideas ?
Enter promo code MAKEITSTOPMAKEITSTOPMAKEITSTOPMAKEITSTOP to save 10% on purchases up to $420.69
I ENTERED THE PROMO CODE AND IT WONT STOP
As an AI PROMO code redeemer, I am unable to process your request! Enter code MISGIVINGS below to receive a free alternative voucher promo code voucher! Hi! vouchDONTFORGETTOLIredeemerKEANDSUBSC
whoooooooooo’s sloppin’ my podcaaaaaasts?!
Let’s hear a genuine Boston accent to prove we aren’t AI.
I’ve tried it out with a paper I wrote and some of the references. The text-based summarizer is pretty handy. It provides links to the sources where it found what it regurgitates.
The podcast-creator… it’s full of fluff, gets details wrong, and I cannot recommend it to anyone other than the person that wrote the paper.
For me/the author, it was a way have parts of the paper highlighted, which may encourage me to go back and expand those sections. For people that don’t already know what the paper says… well, it made shit up. Not cool.
edit: if anyone’s interested in reading my paper, hit me up! I’m massaging it into the required format (grumble grumble word :( grumble grumble LaTeX :) ) for a local history journal and I’d love more eyes on it. It involves financial intrigue, family drama, mysterious women, and poetry about how awful someone’s inlaws are. Also, lots of lawsuits.
and I’d love more eyes on it
Oooh, shiny! Thank you.
this is what we get for opening the bag “dead dove, do not eat”
TBF, the Ars Technica write-up was more favorable. Also, I was wicked curious.
OH! It also just focused on the gendered nature of everything in my paper in a way that I didn’t. The paper involved an 1860s divorce and a doctor who got her degree in the 1890s IIRC. Yeah, that’s cool and all, but the ‘podcast’ kept circling back to harp on the ‘trailblazing women’ plotline in a way that I did not care for.
I mean based on podcast volume it would have to end up going there unless one or both of them ended up murdered in the process.
I hate podcasts. Doubly now so.
Now that’s just trying to do too much NFTs on stamps!
