• zeppo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’m more of a practical American socialist than a radical communist (since that’s unlikely to happen here) but it offends me because republicans are just so ignorant. The average Republican essentially has no idea what socialism, communism or fascism actually are, and conservatives have been using this as a scary label for my entire life.

    • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      3 months ago

      I’m more of a practical American socialist than a radical communist (since that’s unlikely to happen here)

      Why do you say this? What’s a “practical American Socialist?”

      • zeppo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        3 months ago
        • practical: I don’t have any delusions that the US will implement leftism more extreme than EU style socialist policies any time soon
        • American: I’m from the US
        • socialist: I feel the government should be involved more in regulating industries, owning certain categories of services, moderating excess wealth, and ensuring the financial/economic well-being of citizens, as opposed to the conservative style which is basically ‘well, if you’re poor then fuck off’.
        • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          3 months ago
          • practical: I don’t have any delusions that the US will implement leftism more extreme than EU style socialist policies any time soon

          The EU doesn’t have socialist policies, you’re referring to social safety nets.

          • socialist: I feel the government should be involved more in regulating industries, owning certain categories of services, moderating excess wealth, and ensuring the financial/economic well-being of citizens, as opposed to the conservative style which is basically ‘well, if you’re poor then fuck off’.

          So you’re talking Social Democracy, like the Nordics, not Socialism.

          • zeppo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            3 months ago

            Not precisely as I mentioned public ownership of some industries and services that are privately owned. Healthcare and drug production would be two good examples.

            • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              3 months ago

              Those are found in the nordics, that’s still dependent on Capitalism as the basis unless you also want to entirely restructure government.

              • zeppo@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                I’d love for the US economic system to somehow be wholly restructured, but incremental improvements are the best we can do currently.

          • NoMadMan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            Look, people have been debating the definition of socialism for decades, and you guys are not going to figure out here today on Lemmy World.

        • zeppo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 months ago

          Defeatist because I’m not pushing for full communism or are you referring to something else?

          • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            The thing about defeatism is that sometimes it’s just correct, the war is lost. Socialism as in the workers owning the means of production is a currently impossible concept for America. Social democracy would need a tidal wave of the YOOTHS building a New Deal-type political coalition as the Boomers die off but it’s something you can work towards.

            • zeppo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 months ago

              The capitalist and nationalist propaganda against communism has been at a completely insane level in the US for 70 years now… yeah, it’s hard to go against, but I do have faith it’s dying out. Conservatives can’t even really remember the USSR currently and younger people, mainly liberal (IN A US POLITICS SENSE) can clearly see the problems with the current system and have desire and will to make it change. Still lots of completely deluded younger folks too, though, and the levels of fascist propaganda we’re dealing with now are massive.

    • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Both parties agree on the standard indoctrination. They only disagree about the purpose/topics of the brainwashing. Neither party wants it to include an honest discussion about socialism, fascism, etc. It’s a self-perpetuating problem where the indoctrinators don’t even understand what this stuff means.

      • zeppo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        I agree that corporate hegemony is non-negotiable in mainstream US politics. The question is what to do about it, and which version is worse. Republicans are far, far worse about everything that is on the table. Democrats are willing to reign in the corporations a little bit and actually help people. The Republican propaganda and the insane policies they think of are far, far worse.

    • NoMadMan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      In order not to be confounded with economic socialists, who the right accuses of wanting everything for free at the expense of others, I always inform people that I am a Nathan J. Robinson socialist.