deleted by creator
They are actually stating that back up again
That 9/11 headline holy shit forgot about that.
Had to look it up, here’s the link: https://theonion.com/issue-37-34-the-september-11th-issue-1828969352/
Did they publish anything within the 9/11 week?
On the wayback machine, for 2001-09-12, they have this:
In light of recent events, The Onion is not publishing new material this week.
The Onion will return Sept. 26, though The Onion A.V. Club is new. Features include interviews with Barbara Ehrenreich, George P. Pelecanos, and Paul Collins. Click here to enter.
looks at todays date
Uh-oh, what did they do THIS year???
deleted by creator
Each one a winner
Trump pronouncing Harris wrong.
But does anyone know what her last name is?
They’re on fire lately.
Pleasantly one of the few examples of a buyout actually improving a company.
who bought them? i hope they invest in the YouTube channel again
by Pretending He Shot in Ear Again
It’s sad that The Onion has had to let all their proofreaders go.
It’s headline grammar. It’s deliberate
That doesn’t sound like headline grammar to me. You wouldn’t introduce confusion about who is doing the shooting on purpose, I don’t think.
Do you have any other examples of it being used this way? “By Pretending Shot In Ear Again” is what I would have expected.
Twilight’s Last Gleaming…
chef’s kiss
The ol redundant onion.
What a shit piece of paper am i… oh, it’s the onion. Wait, this isn’t real?
