We used to have earbuds that don’t need to be charged because they had a headphone jack, didn’t get lost so easily because they had a cord attached to a headphone jack, never lost the bluetooth connection because they had a headphone jack, and they cost less because they had a headphone jack. https://bsky.app/profile/daisyfm.bsky.social/post/3l3mfjc6sn62k

    • zeppo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 months ago

      Because of….? Anyway I have headphones that have a lightning jack and don’t need an adapter.

      • Welt@lazysoci.al
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        You mean the proprietary ones that came with your iPhone? Well that covers every use case anyone could ever have.

        • zeppo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          It certainly covers the use case for an iPhone, right? Not sure what you’re trying to say. If you don’t have an iPhone why would you care if iPhones have 3.5mm jacks?

        • desktop_user
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          apple also makes a usb-c one, apparently it works reasonably well and is an actual DAC unlike some which are weird passive adapters that don’t work through hubs.

    • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      IDK. I use one and have no problem with it. My car’s bluetooth is rather unreliable at connecting, so I just us a USB C->aux cable. I’ve got no complaints. Is it as good a signal as a properly paired bluetooth digital audio connection? No. But it’s certainly as good as the old aux->aux cables I used back in the day.