• Airbnb stock tumbled 14% in one day after the company predicted slowing demand.
  • Some former Airbnb diehards say they now prefer the consistency of hotels.
  • Airbnb said it might increase travelers’ ability to book hotel rooms through Airbnb.
  • DaCrazyJamez@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    185
    ·
    4 months ago

    I stopped doing airbnbs a few years ago. Hidden fees, unreasonable rules and requirements. And now more expensive than most hotels. They just are worse now.

  • Zerlyna@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    91
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    I had a bad experience on AirBnB. Had tickets to see a band downtown Asheville. Labor Day Weekend. Found an airbnb in walking distance at a reasonable rate. Booked in April. Day before the stay, got a notice the host cancelled. No explanation. By that point it was $400 a night before taxes and parking for a hotel room downtown. Wound up not going. Ruined my weekend. Never again.

    • Stupidmanager@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      76
      ·
      4 months ago

      And zero penalty for the host. They only need to claim property damage. I’ve been burned twice by this, and once drove up anyway and the host rented it out on a diff platform for 3x. I played stupid and the guy told me he rented it through vrbo, the day before. I showed him my reservation that now showed canceled as of the day before.

    • gangdinesout@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 months ago

      I had a similar experience with VRBO. My family booked way in advance to see the eclipse, and the host ended up cancelling it a couple weeks before the stay. No penalties for them. I suspect they realized they could charge way more than what we were paying.

  • phoneymouse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    67
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    I’ve stayed at my share of Airbnbs booked by others, but never really enjoyed the feeling of sleeping in some strangers house. Also, disliked the impact of airbnbs on local housing markets. The idea of replacing long term housing with short term housing is completely stupid from a public policy perspective and a great way to ruin a city.

    Additionally, I like being a customer, and anonymous. I don’t want to be rated by the host. I don’t want to be judged on whether I put my own towels in the washing machine before I checked out. If I’m paying, that shouldn’t be my damn job.

    Also, airbnbs are random. Some are good, some are awful. Some hosts are fine, some are a bit too much. Hotels do vary, but on the whole, the experience is much more consistent.

    • Thebeardedsinglemalt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Exactly, I lost all taste for Airbnb when we were staying for 2 nights, and every 4 hours the owner was balsting me with text messages telling me I needed to rate them 5 stars because if I didn’t they wouldn’t rate me 5 stars…but I had to take out my own trash, put all towels and linens in the washer, and make sure to tidy up before I left or else I’d incur their “clean up fee”. Fuck that shit, I’m not paying you a shitton of money to clean up after myself. Especially when half the bathrooms have black mold and rotten water damaged wood around the showers, and you have to be extra mindful because this was a time when hidden cameras were common.

      • APassenger@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        4 months ago

        Cleaning fees are just overhead on staying now. But if you don’t tidy your rating will take a hit.

        It’s a scam coming and going. But it’s often cheaper and with more selection on location. The last two, I think, are really what keeps them around.

        • fuzzzerd@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          Ability to zero in on location is definitely the thing that keeps me on the platform. I can’t say its always cheaper, it maybe in some cases but its often equal or higher than a budget hotel in my experience. The fact that I can get a unit with a kitchen and within walking distance of a few of my planned vacation activities is the reason I check it out.

    • feannag@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      4 months ago

      For me, it’s almost always the cheapest/most convenient way to stay somewhere with a kitchen. And it may be an okay kitchen but almost always better than a hotel’s. That’s the part I find the hardest to replicate outside of Airbnb.

      • jonne@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        4 months ago

        Short stay apartments are a thing, but you’ll typically only find them in big cities.

    • blackbirdbiryani@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      To chime in on your anonymous comment, racism is a huge issue for AirBnB too. None of my brown friends are able to book one without the help of a white friend/partner, because of their names and the lack of AirBnB history.

  • ocassionallyaduck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    58
    ·
    4 months ago

    AirBnb is just a pain in the ass that hardly saves you money anymore. It’s often the same.

    You want nice clean sheets, fresh linens, and nice amenities that go with it? Get a hotel.

    You just absolutely have to have a home or flat vibe? Well be ready to do apartment laundry, sweep and vacuumvand make the beds and clean all the dishes and only enter and exit between these hours because the keypad doesn’t recognize you otherwise…

    Greedy fucks ruined AirBnB because the company encouraged it and let them do so. And then fucked over the guests too many times. And now I’d rather stay in a reliable location than deal with the absolute hassle of their company or their company’s shitty clients.

    Good riddance.

    • sparky@lemmy.federate.cc@lemmy.federate.cc
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      4 months ago

      Yep, this 100%. I travel a lot for work and have probably stayed in 100 airbnbs over the years, but these days I ask the company not to bother and to book hotels instead. It’s gone from a platform to get a nice home away from home, to a place to get gouged by rude hosts while staying in a barracks with the sparsest of IKEA finishings. They’ve done it to themselves by encouraging shitty host behavior and having zero consequences for bad guest experiences.

    • myliltoehurts@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      4 months ago

      It still has one specific usecase where I find it better - when you need more than 2 beds. We use it when on holiday with my friends because usually getting an Airbnb with 3-4 beds is way cheaper than hotel rooms.

      But in pretty much all other cases… yep, would much rather have a hotel. Last time I had a host who took electric meter readings and charged you for the electricity… luckily it was negligible since the oven was broken.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      The couple really great AirBnB stays I’ve had were for family reunions. So larger than even extended stay hotels are really made for. And they were run by companies, not individual people.

      • ocassionallyaduck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        These have always existed though. AirBnB isn’t an app listing, but offers nothing to that equation. Cabin and event space rentals have been a thing for decades. You don’t see Wedding Venues needing AirBnb you know?

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          I think we have different definitions of family reunion. I’m talking about 6-10 people.

  • barsquid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    4 months ago

    That’s odd. Do people not want to pay hotel prices and a “cleaning fee” and also clean up the place before they leave? Or is it like they want to show up and the room they booked actually exists?

    • ikidd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      4 months ago

      No, people like to find out that there’s a fucking rooster farm across the road and that you have to park 3 miles away. It’s all part of the adventure.

  • otp@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    4 months ago

    AirBnB is a great idea that turned to shit because of greed.

    Someone wants a platform to rent out…

    • Their cottage when they’re not using it or lending it to family or friends
    • Their home while they’re away on vacation
    • A room in their home to run as a Bed-N-Breakfast

    Great. Marvelous, even.

    But then people realized that they could make more money from a property by AirBnBing it out rather than renting it out. So people start kicking out tenants and buying up properties to turn housing into AirBnBs, and often in areas that were already experiencing cost-of-living issues for locals.

    From there, I’m guessing that AirBnB started trying to take a bigger slice of the pie, and “Hosts” started passing on the costs to “Guests”. At the same time, “Hosts” wanted more money with less work, so “Guests” started getting cleaning lists so the “Hosts” wouldn’t have to pay cleaners – just someone to come by and make sure everything was done, and call a cleaner if it wasn’t (and charge the “Guest” for it).

    Enshittification hit AirBnB hard…and in turn, living within driving distance of anywhere tourists would want to be also got enshittified.

  • Bustedknuckles@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    4 months ago

    That describes my family. We’ve done Airbnb and VRBO, but now pretty much stick to hotels. You know what you’re getting, price is competitive, to bdint have to wash your own bedding, and a lot of hotel workers are unionized. That’s all in addition to the awareness that every Airbnb house could be a home for someone who needs it. I won’t be sad if the Airbnb model folds and helps the housing market regain a bit of sanity

  • ImADifferentBird
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    4 months ago

    Airbnb was great when it all began, but now it’s overrun by corporate vultures that buy up housing and turn it into illicit hotels. Not to even mention, it costs about the same as a hotel these days and I’ve never stayed in a hotel that gives you a chore list.

    • WanderingVentra@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Like every other company lol. I remember when Uber and Lyft were so much cheaper, too. It’s why I don’t want gamepass to take over all gaming, or streaming to take over all physical video media. It always starts out nice, but eventually…

      • ocassionallyaduck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 months ago

        THANK YOU for seeing the writing on the wall. I keep reminding people of this.

        Gamepass is unbeatable value. But if you give it market share you better believe after they jack the price a few more times, games willvstop providing a disc at all and just be “Gamepass exclusive” in the sense youvcan only subscribe to it, not buy it.

  • normalexit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    4 months ago

    Hotels are pretty nice. They come to make up your room, they have a nice person at the front desk to help you out with any issues, and they will usually have a breakfast option or at least some free coffee.

    Airbnb has a lot of potential downsides: from cleaning and fees to broken stuff and hidden cameras. I’ve been in a few situations that have been weird to put it mildly.

    Sometimes weird can be fun, but if I just want a clean bed and a reliable experience, I go to the hotel these days

  • Snapz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    4 months ago

    I was solely airbnb for years, down to literally nothing now. Won’t even search the site anymore. Many reasons articulated by others, but just a pure garbage company and garbage “homeowners” who are mostly just vc conglomerates and bs fronts now - last time I looked, I saw a listing that was overpriced, but I was going to do it out of last minute need…

    Host was named Miranda and showed profile pic of a smiling younger women. Listing text was written in her voice. I had a specific question that I sent and received an odd, cold form response, not in her same tone. Then looked and saw that Miranda owned most every property in this beachfront area? She looked pretty young, but okay, good for you. Looked further and found that “Miranda” was actually just the name of a property management group. That wasn’t her in the profile picture, she didn’t exist. She wasn’t going to answer my question, she didn’t give a shit, because she was… not.

    Fuck you in your stupid greedy faces, hotels will do.

  • nucleative@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    4 months ago

    Airbnb has been in a race to bring the worst of the tech industry’s profit consuming corporatism (no phone number, horrid customer service, lots of rules that nobody follows, privacy nightmares) to an industry that focused on hospitality - by definition a high-touch service - and we are all worse off because of that.

    • jonne@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      4 months ago

      Not to mention the ‘hosts’ have been tacking all sorts of fees on top of your stay, and requiring people to do deep cleans, leaving a key in some lockbox a block away, etc.

      At this point you just want to get a hotel even if it costs more instead of dealing with some of their shit. In a hotel you walk in, someone actually is there to greet you, there’s no expectation that you clean the room, etc.

      Airbnb ruined their own product by letting the hosts ruin the experience.

  • GrayBackgroundMusic@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    4 months ago

    I’m not paying more money to get no-breakfast, and have to do chores, and have a 15% chance of crazy owner, and a non-zero chance of it being a scam, and have AirBNB corporate give me the run around.

  • WatDabney@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    4 months ago

    Airbnb is a fine example of a sort of variation on enshittification.

    The way it works is a new company with a new and notably cost-effective way of doing things comes along and is unsurprisingly wildly successful. And then, inevitably, that leads to them hiring a whole raft of executive parasites who all have to be paid obscene salaries for doing nothing of any real value, which means the company needs to raise prices and cut back on services in order to generate more profit to pay those salaries. And meanwhile, the new executives, with nothing of any note that they actually need to or even can do, but with a need to create some illusion that they’re necessary, have pointless meetings in which they propose and wrangle about and eventually approve and implement new policies and new plans that are generally awful.

    And pretty quickly and not coincidentally the new company ends up at least as bloated, mismanaged, overpriced and under-performing as the companies they so recently replaced.

    See also: Uber, DoorDash and the entire streaming industry.

    • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      While you got the effects correct, you got the process wrong and that’s important.

      The way it works is a new company with a new and notably cost-effective way of doing things comes along and is unsurprisingly wildly successful.

      The business model isn’t based on cost effectiveness. Most of these companies work at a loss for a long time, providing artificially low prices in order to gain market share and push existing players out. This is isn’t new. It’s called dumping. Irs just been a bit obscured by buzzwords like “new technology” and “disruption.”

      And then, inevitably, that leads to them hiring a whole raft of executive parasites who all have to be paid obscene salaries for doing nothing of any real value, which means the company needs to raise prices and cut back on services in order to generate more profit to pay those salaries.

      These executives aren’t hired to do nothing and collect high salaries. Their salaries aren’t what drives the price increases. The major shareholders who spent their money to sustain the company so far want to get return on that money. They install executives with this one goal - maximize profit - so they can get this return. This is what drives the hiring of sociopaths who drive prices up in order to increase profits at all costs. This is what drives hiring such people in all public corporations. You got the effects right but the reasons aren’t to do with shit execs and their salaries. It’s all to do with major shareholders search for growing profits. Everything else follows from there. This is important to understand in order to point the finger in the right direction. Misdirecting people’s substantiated anger with the system has been a perennial tool used to maintain profit maximization for as long as possible.

      • jonne@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        4 months ago

        The thing about Airbnb and Uber is that their model is renting out other people’s stuff. A hotel has to do the capital investment to actually build a hotel, a taxi company has to invest in cars and a taxi medallion. They just had to build and maintain a website and use other people’s capital. The only reason they spend billions is in executive compensation and short term subsidising of prices to gain market share.

      • _different_username@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 months ago

        I’d also like to point out that the underlying model may well be unsustainable in the way that it is offered at the start. Who benefits when a for-profit company operates at a loss? We, the customers, do. We get low prices and customer-friendly practices that are genuinely enjoyable. That business can’t operate in that way indefinitely, as the early investors are not funding it as an act of charity.

        Eventually, the bill comes due. The shareholders have funded the company on the premise that, after losing lots of money on customer acquisition, it can restructure and monetize those customers and recoup their investment, hopefully with a lucrative return when they decide to capitalize their holdings and find a new company with which to repeat the process.

        There is absolutely no reason not to enjoy the perks of the early stage of the customer acquisition process; the shareholders are subsidizing your product at no cost to you. But we shouldn’t be surprised when the shareholders stop subsidizing and start squeezing their formerly pampered customers in the hopes of getting their money back (and more, of course).

        This doesn’t excuse unethical or abusive practices, but it does mean that, even without them, the experience of those early days probably wasn’t going to last forever.

        • snooggums@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          4 months ago

          There is absolutely no reason not to enjoy the perks of the early stage of the customer acquisition process; the shareholders are subsidizing your product at no cost to you.

          At the individual level, sure. Even for things like streaming services it isn’t a net negative to take advantage of those ‘introductory’ prices.

          But a lot of these businesses that operate at an obvious loss are undercutting currently existing business practices that are probably more cost efficient than these new businesses. Like restaurants that used to take care of their own delivery were undercut by malicious pricing from door dash and uber eats only to wind up in a situation where they would have to start from scratch again or pay the outrageous extortion fees to DD and UE.

          I avoided both DD and UE because I knew it would not be sustainably long term. It was obvious they were maliciously undercutting competition. Same with uber and lyft and all the other ride share businesses, although at least they got some reform going on the taxi side.

        • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          There is absolutely no reason not to enjoy the perks of the early stage of the customer acquisition process;

          I can think of one reason. Depriving the existing industry from revenue leading to its demise which ensures the new entrant can raise their prices higher than the preexisting status quo. This is the other part of the equation that makes dumping work. Of course we can’t expect most people to choose to pay more but if people were able to resist that, the strategy wouldn’t work.

  • fritobugger2017@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    4 months ago

    I stopped looking at ABnB a few years ago. It stopped making financial and quality of life sense. The costs became nearly equal or greater than that of hotels I cross shopped.

    The hassle though is what really killed it. The inconvenience of dealing with a host that was not on-site and often not available to deal with issues plus the long list of chores required and the potential penalties of not following them perfectly just made it not worth doing.