• Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net
    shield
    M
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    Remember the sacred texts:

    You all are making me work too hard, so I’m locking this dumpster fire and drinking my coffee.

  • Valmond@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    144
    ·
    3 months ago

    Oh so baity!

    You can remove “western democracy” there I guess.

    Also nah, I can speak out against my boss, my eventual landlord and protest in the streets, because I live in France, a western democracy.

    YMMW.

    • Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      3 months ago

      The French are smart enough to burn cars and loot when their government tries to pull some bullshit. I wish Germans were that smart.

    • bouh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      3 months ago

      And yet most of the political forces in France are advocating to remove all these rights. Sindicalists are arrested under terrorist laws, as are eco-activists. And maires trying to enforce price ceiling for lawns in cities are considered like Staline.

      • Valmond@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        3 months ago

        Sure and that is bad.

        What does it have to do with the discussion though? Or is it “west bad” whatever happens?

        • bouh@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          3 months ago

          So as long as the litteral nazis are not in charge genociding people it’s fine and there’s nothing to worry about? Syndicalistes and ecoactivists being arrested for terrorism is fine already?

            • LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              I mean if the above things are what defines the west then yeah. But I don’t think they do, or at least they don’t have to - I believe we stand for better things than that - for liberty, for democracy and welfare of all and I believe in progress, not complacency and decay thinly veiled by whataboutism.

              EDIT: The user above clearly manipulated vote counts. All his comments get an extra 8-12 upvotes, everything that disagrees with him has an extra 8-12 downvotes. Blocked and reported.

    • LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 months ago

      eventual landlord

      So you’re a child? Lol good luck speaking out against a landlord, don’t you know it’s like a job interview nowadays with references from past landlords and all?

      • UndercoverUlrikHD@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        3 months ago

        That is completely dependent on country and who you try to rent from. In Norway the most I ever had to do is consent to an automatic check to prove I don’t have any reports of not paying bills.

        • Dasus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          3 months ago

          You ever rent from a private landlord, instead of letting agency?

          I’m Finnish, and what you say has been true for me — aside from when my credit got fucked (due to some semiauthoritarian bullshit), when I had to rent from a private landlord.

          That was more or less exactly how the earlier commenter describes it; an interview. Luckily I was just over 20 and out of the army as an NCO, so the old couple were really into that and gave me the apartment.

          I also used to believe our cops weren’t that bad. Until I was detained and saw how they act behind closed doors.

          • UndercoverUlrikHD@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            3 months ago

            I’ve only rented from companies as it’s generally safer and you know that they will (most likely) follow the law.

            You never know what you get when you rent from people, their professionality and knowledge of the various laws are highly variable. You could get lucky, and you could get very unlucky.

            • LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              Problem is private dodgy blokes is the only way some people can afford to rent out alone at all, that it be forced like rats into some houseshare dump. Coming from someone who does the same thing you do for the same reasons.

        • bouh@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          In France you need to earn 3 times the price of the lawn, and you need warrants (garants) : people who will be forced to pay if you ever don’t. To prove you can pay, you need 3 months of salary sheets. You need to prove your job is not a CDD (short determined time). You need to show insurances and prove your identity too of course. Half of those are not legal, but landlords don’t care because you’re in competition : you visit the apartment with a dozen of other people who want a place to sleep too. And the landlord will choose the chosen one as he pleases.

          It depends on the place, but Lyon is absolute madness to find an apartment.

        • LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          Oh for sure. I’m not french but I’m relatively familiar with the rental laws there as I considered them in depth when I considered moving and they’re not much better than the UK, where it is utter dogshit.

      • Valmond@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        3 months ago

        I own my appartement but I have rented over 20 different ones before that.

        No need to namecall just because you don’t understand 😊

        • LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Oh ok so you haven’t rented in the current market. So actually it’s you who doesn’t understand eh?

          Idk what you meant in that case by “eventual landlord”, maybe try actually making sense first and then maybe you won’t get name-called as much. 😊

          From what I can tell, France still has essentially no-fault evictions and nowhere near sufficient renter protections, while there is a housing crisis going on. It’s not anywhere near as bad as the UK, but given the regulations as I can see them, I wouldn’t risk speaking out against the landlord in any capacity there either. This doesn’t even touch the fact that France is also fairly centralised, in that job opportunities are richer closer to the city and the bigger the city, and Paris is even worse for living expenses overall than London.

          • bouh@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            3 months ago

            That is totally right. I’m french. Laws protect renters, but not that much, and landlords don’t hesitate to threaten with false pretense. And if you mention anything illegal they’re doing, you simply won’t have the apartment. They ask documents they have no right to see, but if you don’t provide them they won’t even look at your application. Obviously people of colour do have a harder time finding an apartment, but even for engineers it’s hard to find one in a city.

      • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 months ago

        lol ever heard of renter’s rights? it’s incredibly fucking difficult to kick out a renter here in sweden, they have to repeatedly be a massive nuisance to everyone around.

        • LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          In Sweden yes, maybe, idk, not Swedish. In Europe no, we have heard of renters’ rights, but as a renter I can tell you we have practically none.

    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 months ago

      And I can do all this in America. Mind you I work somewhere that struggles to keep people and more selective jobs do pull this shit, same with my landlord. And yeah protesting does often go that way if you’re left wing

    • halvar@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 months ago

      Doesn’t matter whether you consider the US a western democracy, they consider themselves one and what OOP says is that that can’t possibly be right for the reasons following. It seems you are in agreement after all.

  • TJDetweiler@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    107
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    For the first 2 points: Don’t use “Western democracies”. This is a US problem. Canada has much stronger labour and home protections.

    3rd point: Getting banned online is a “you” problem. Your government has nothing to do with why your shitty opinions get you banned or muted. The fact that you even have the ability to complain about your government online is a luxury many other governments don’t afford to their people.

    4th point: Whining about cereal variety makes the entire argument hold less water. Who the fuck cares about brands of cereal. Buy your cereal or don’t, but shut the fuck up about it. This is an empty complaint about capitalism.

    5th point: Fair enough.

    I don’t directly mean you, OP. Unless you made the meme… In which case I do mean directly you.

    • halvar@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      42
      ·
      3 months ago

      I think cereal is brought in to demonstrate the absurdity of the situation, where something so basic as worker’s or renter’s rights are non-existent but somehow energy already has went into something so stupid as cereal, which indeed nobody cares about.

      • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        I think it’s more because in American anti communist propaganda the ability to choose between different brands and varieties of products was often highlighted as one of the great strengths of capitalism. It is certainly a benefit of markets over poorly run centralized economies, but there’s everything from market socialism to centralized economies that place more emphasis on ensuring consumer satisfaction.

        But yeah it’s often a thing that new socialists in America mock

    • mumblerfish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      3 months ago

      First point is definetly a problem in other western democracies. In Sweden there is the “loyalty obligation”, which states that you have to – according to one of the centrist unions here – “put the interest of the company above your own”. It is a strong intrusion in your freedom of speech.

      • TJDetweiler@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 months ago

        Sweden is a western democracy?

        Sounds like that Swedish centrist union should pound sand

        • mumblerfish@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 months ago

          “Unionen”. I think they focus a lot on like engineers and bosses, and other upper middle class jobs.

          I don’t think the union is really to blame there, “loyalty obligation”, lojalitetsplikt, is afaik a set of laws that really does what Unionen says about it. It’s not the union implementing it.

          To be frank, I think its quite a refreshingly honest phrasing they are using. A more company-friendly way would be like “we all like to be teamplayers, and that is what the loyalty obligation is all about”, or something like that. Now it sounds like “you are the guy on the track in the trolly problem meme, get fucked”, and to some degree, fair play to you.

          • OhShitSon@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            From what I could read during my morning fugue state, it seems to me that they’re warning you that the contract you signed when getting hired does not allow you to be disloyal to the company as long as you’re working for it. I could not find anything about it being an actual law, though I’ve been wrong before so it wouldn’t surprise me if I missed something.

            • mumblerfish@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              3 months ago

              Som anställd har du lojalitetsplikt gentemot arbetsgivaren – även under en uppsägningstid. Se upp så att du inte bryter mot LAS eller lagen om företagshemligheter.

              Om du då är illojal, kan det betyda att du bryter mot LAS ( Lagen om anställningsskydd)

              So it is a colloquial term for those aspects of LAS and lagen om företagshemligheter. Those quotes from Unionen again. There seems to be aspects (the application of this after your employment ends) also regulated in the collective bargening agreements, and those are not laws, that is true.

    • Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 months ago

      I agree with the fish that what you say is USA only isn’t.
      Basically where economy (power) is dominated by the few such problems exist.

      But I would just like to add that I still cringed when you brought up Canada as the counterpoint to USA. Its not that I disagree with what you wanted to compare, its just that to me those two countries are such an extremely similar shade of late stage systems they seem the same unless in direct comparison.

      • RedditWanderer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Canada is very different from the US in many ways relevant to this post.

        Canada doesn’t have “at will” work. Medicine is purchased by the government with immense buying power. Canada has anti-hate laws that supercede free speech, and still have the right to protest and assemble (which has basically been removed in the US). Women’s health is protected, and hopefully soon they will offer free hygiene products for women. Maternity/paternity leave is protected. No abortion bans here. Weed is legal, and harm reduction therapy is a common thing.

        I could go on but i feel like you just wanted to cringe at people who don’t think the US is a proper “developed” country.

        You are also wrong about the economy being controlled by a few. When there is actually only a few, like dictators, they come and take your entire crops for almost nothing, which is an unthinkable tax rate for democracies. You don’t get education, and you don’t get highways or drinking water. These things are offered to you because the government needs productive citizens to make money. It’s The rules for rulers. Democracies are complicated and full of corruption specifically because it takes many people to do anything, not a few.

        Tl;dr It takes 2 seconds of research to see you are wrong on every point.

        • Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          3 months ago

          I think you have not understood me when I explicitly agreed with the point - twice in the same post.

          What did you even “research” (and why/how was that new to you)?

          • RedditWanderer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            Ok try not to trip over backpedaling there.

            You said you cringed at comparing the US to Canada because it’s the same shade of grey. It’s not. That’s what we’re talking about, it doesn’t matter that you agree with the post in general.

            I didn’t need to research, because I’m not an ignorant idiot who speaks about countries they know nothing about. You on the other hand, could have done some research before making shit up. There’s literally a 20 minute educational video in my link, watch it, that’s considered researching this information…

            Even if not in direct comparison, they aren’t the same shade of grey at all. Canada is comparable to Europe, not the US. And yes they are all late stage capitalistic nations, congrats on that astute observation. It doesn’t mean you aren’t wrong

            • Saryn@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              Side topic: I find it very interesting that mods will not act against toxic comments like these that obviously use ad hominem but will remove a lot of comments that are critical of ideas that the mods support simply for existing. Go figure.

              • RedditWanderer@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                3 months ago

                The rules are pretty clear. It’s okay to say someone is acting like an idiot, and it’s not ok to call someone an idiot… i dont necessarily agree, but them are the rules

                When they say they “cringe” at what the person said, it means they feel second hand embarrassment. It’s saying theyre embarassing. Is that some toxic ad hominem that should get you banned?

              • Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                3 months ago

                No, no, the redditor has got a point, I am not disputing the fact that I’m an idiot at all.

                (But yes about that you said. Then again I don’t know much about mod tools, like if there is word flagging, or even how many mods there are.)

                • RedditWanderer@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  3 months ago

                  And you’re using “the redditor” not as a toxic ad hominem right?

                  I’m not a redditor anymore, i left the very day RIF stopped working.

            • Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 months ago

              Canada is comparable to Europe, not the US.

              I didn’t need to research, because I’m not an ignorant idiot who speaks about countries they know nothing about.

              :)

              Unless by “Europe” you mean UK, which Im again going to bunch in with Canada and USA.

              • RedditWanderer@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                3 months ago

                So now youre going to dismiss everything you said, and make a new point.

                Tell us, oh wise one, why what I just said doesn’t compare to other European countries except the UK? Tell me why I don’t understand these other countries I’ve lived? The other comparisons here were France. Tell.me the democratic differences between france and canada? Germany? Spain? Italy?

                Or just ridicule yourself again and make a different point.

                If youre thinking about sweden and finland, that’s not “most european countries”.

                • Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  3 months ago

                  Oh noo, I ridiculed myself by, um, making a point about what you pointed out in such a civilised manner?

                  Also what new point?
                  I was reapplying to “the first two points” (labour laws and housing), this is what this whole thread is about.

                  Otherwise due to historical reasons one could bunch Europe countries in the previous centuries in roughly two groups, one that went way into what became capitalism (mostly fueled & sustained by colonialism) and the other bunch that invested into state socialism (what Bismarck did or his vision was & countries modeled their policies by). Ofc there were wars, rise & fall of dictatorships/one-party systems, and each country is a separate unique story with its own nuances, but the general division kinda stayed (it’s hard to take away rights from people) and is still evident: wiki/List_of_countries_by_social_welfare_spending.

                  It makes all the difference how the policies are implemented and used. Like ‘how much’ social security covers, how much is done on housing policies/projects, etc. Or - eg payed maternity (or even sick) leave, sure you can group by ‘can has’ and ‘can not has’, but a difference between one week and year(s) is basically a different system and culture altogether. I mention this specifically as iirc Canada generally takes care of it’s moms to come slightly closer to what your are saying in and effort to be good at communicating & not leaving (accidentally) negative feelings all around.
                  :)

    • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      For the first 2 points: Don’t use “Western democracies”. This is a US problem. Canada has much stronger labour and home protections.

      It’s a Capitalism problem, Canada suffers from much of the same issues. It isn’t as bad, but it is bad.

  • yeahiknow3@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    78
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    In the US, maybe. But that’s considered a flawed democracy and getting worse all the time. Only 8% of the nations on earth are full democracies, a number that continues to fall because of the pessimism and stupidity promulgated by authoritarian regimes.

    • salmoura@lemmy.eco.br
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      49
      ·
      3 months ago

      Germany on “full democracy” at the same time it bans symbols of Palestinian support and uses the state’s violence to contain such manifestations.

      • Darukhnarn@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        Deutsch
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        3 months ago

        Germany bans stuff al the time. It’s a consequence of our history and the historic leniency towards extremist edges. Your example is debatable in it’s execution, the general thought however is not.

      • Gormadt
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        3 months ago

        Nobody’s perfect, and if you’re in Germany you should reach out to your politicians about it.

          • Gormadt
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            3 months ago

            I didn’t say not to protest.

            In fact protesting is incredibly useful when the calls of many go unheard or ignored.

            And having an effective protest is only possible if you can get a lot of people together, so it’s best to not shit on people from hello for saying exactly what you think is the “right” thing.

            Not to mention having a large community of people reaching out before having to protest is also helpful, so doing good community building is also important.

    • I'm Hiding 🇦🇺@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      3 months ago

      Haha! Australia is a full democracy? What a joke!

      Australia is America’s bitch. Even if our politicians gave a shit, they couldn’t do anything.

    • LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      3 months ago

      UK is a full democracy? That’s a fucking joke, literally all of this applies here. Including no-fault (read: spoke out against landlord or asked for repairs) evictions.

      • Dasus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 months ago

        Finland is also a fucking joke.

        Reminds me of the time that Madventures bros were in India, talking to a local policeman, and said “Finland is said to be the least corrupt nation in the world” and the Indian policeman laughed so heartily into his moustache I almost fell off my chair.

          • Track_Shovel@slrpnk.netM
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            3 months ago

            You reported him based on him stating an opinion. I ought to ban you for making me click a button.

            Simply: the “report” button is not for this function. I am a lazy and malicious mod. Don’t make me do work.

              • Track_Shovel@slrpnk.netM
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                3 months ago

                I did browse his profile to see what you were getting at, and I couldn’t find anything supporting this claim. If you have examples, great - I am open-minded and willing to change a stance. I’m not, however, doing a deep dive into a Lemmy user’s past history. I don’t like virtual fishing expeditions, and found this kind of ‘gotcha-ism’ is what made Reddit so toxic.

                Further, even if this person is moderately pro-russian, as long as they aren’t actively condoning the invasion of Ukraine, or actually spreading propaganda, that’s ok in my book. People are welcome to their opinions, and there many, many, shades of grey.

                • Dasus@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  3 months ago

                  I’ll save you time. I’m Finnish, an NCO in the army reserves. I’ll DM you my sotilaspassi if you want to, lol.

                  He just simply doesn’t like me, and hasn’t the werewithall to actually compose an argument of any type. If you look at his profile, you’ll see it’s filled with “now I know you’re an X troll” comments. His lack of imagination is — as the kids say — cringe.

                  I’m in no way pro-Russian. I actually had a point in my comment. Something I can back up with legally documented personal experiences. I think he just simps Finland and doesn’t actually know what goes around here, so he leaves those asinine oneliners.

          • Dasus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 months ago

            Yeah. Must be.

            Can’t be that you, an American, would be ignorant of what is going on in other countries. That would simply be unheard of. /s

            Here’s some aftermath of my personal experience.

            https://www.hs.fi/suomi/art-2000009654524.html

            Obviously you’re gonna need to use a translator, as even though I can communicate in your language, you can’t do so in mine.

    • Schmoo@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      This infographic is produced by a capitalist propaganda network, Visual Capitalist, using data from a capitalist think tank, EIU (Economic Intelligence Unit). I would download the report and scrutinize their methodology but it requires you enter a ton of personal information.

    • Vilian@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      How the fuck made that chart that put USA on top of Brazil, here the president isn’t immune to prison just because he has money

      • Schmoo@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 months ago

        The infographic was produced by a company called Visual Capitalist. Influence of money on the political process doesn’t factor into their calculations. Hell, it probably gives the score a boost.

  • AVincentInSpace@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    3 months ago

    if I speak out online I could be muted or banned

    Do you have any idea what social platforms look like when this is not the case?

  • Vilian@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    3 months ago

    You live in USA, stop comparing your shit democracy with the rest of us

  • Tja@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    3 months ago

    If you think living in a non “western democracy” allows you to shit talk your boss or the government… I invite you to try.

    I hope this won’t be banned for wishing death on someone.

  • Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    3 months ago

    More like: I am so happy I live in america.

    Everywhere else you have job protection and renters protection

  • OwlPaste@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    3 months ago

    Yeah totally should do that in an autocratic country, lets go with Russia and lets see how long it would take before the original poster is on their way to a Siberian gulag

    • Jiggle_Physics@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      3 months ago

      Hey, my house has a lot things that need repaired. I should probably bring up these issues with my family, and get to work on fixing them.

      Oh, the house down the road is on fire? Guess I should be fine my house is only falling into disrepair.

    • Gormadt
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      3 months ago

      Or in China, I’m sure they could at least say their concerns once before they’re social credit is shit and they get disappeared.

    • cheddar@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      That’s the “in Africa kids are starving and you’re refusing to eat your broccoli” level of argument. Yes, it’s bad in Russia, but that doesn’t mean everything is perfect in their country. And that doesn’t mean they shouldn’t strive to make the situation better. Moreover, without any push back it can only get worse.

    • general_kitten@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 months ago

      If that is the bar we have to pass humanity isn’t doing too well now is it? I myself would like to hold a modern country to even a little bit higher standards.

      • OwlPaste@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        And they can vote for a better future. Last UK election we got a labour victory but 8% fewer people voted. Thats crazy.

        Of topic, i agree with that, country borders are what making people xenophobic

    • Commiunism@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      While I do see your point, I think the main idea behind this post is that we’re told that we live in civilized free western world, but once we rebel, speak ill or become in any way a ‘threat’ to people on top (while staying within the rules of society of course), that’s when you get punished for it.

      Something I’ll give to autocratic countries is that even though you have no freedom, at least you’re fully aware of it. In western countries, you have some freedom but are led to believe you actually have more, if not full, freedom.

      • Alexstarfire@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 months ago

        Except only the last point really has anything to do with the government. It’s freedom from government control, not freedom to do anything you want with no consequences.

  • ultramaven@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    3 months ago

    What disgusts me most about conservative voters and capitalists is most of them are so ignorant to admit that capitalism requires balance by virtue. You cannot exist in an environment where everyone is free to have money and buy things with that money and there will always ben enough supply for demand without serious guardrails to ensure it. What MAGA stands for is the idea that capitalism should be highly regulated, highly balanced, and highly fair. These people believe that to their core. They just… don’t vote that way. They’re so arrogant, so propagandized, they’ll continue to vote for the people that wish to continue destabilizing the balance.

    • Zoboomafoo@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      I pity conservative voters. They’ve been brainwashed by Fox News for decades if not their entire lives

    • Dasus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      What MAGA stands for is the idea that capitalism should be highly regulated, highly balanced, and highly fair.

      Oh fuck right off, no they do not.

      That’s market socialism you’re describing, and MAGA bigots definitely don’t stand for it, much less understanding that “capitalism” isn’t synonymous with “market economy”, much much less caring about actual economics, and more just getting to be in a group of likeminded bigots.

      • ultramaven@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        I agree, in that most MAGA don’t really believe in much of anything, if a belief must stand a rigorous showing of competence. However, America has been a country championing socialist policy for almost 100 years. Even those spouting Trumpian garbage believe in liberalism. They just have labels and made-up feelings provided to them by the capitalist overclass, convincing them to destroy themselves.

        • Dasus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          However, America has been a country championing socialist policy for almost 100 years.

          Uh, what?

          You have horrible social security and labour laws. If anyone has been “championing socialist policies”, it’s the Nordics, or if talking labour rights especially, France definitely more than the US.

          The American anti-socialist rhetoric is so bad it has its own name. Even very moderate socialist policies are often disparaged as “communism”.

          There’s so much libertarianism online now, mostly affected by said American rhetoric, that I’ve actually met an idiot here in Finland who genuinely argued that homelessness and unemployment is a conscious choice by anyone suffering either.

          You sound a bit like Peter Thiel in this clip (played on John Oliver) where he is pretending Trump’s rhetoric has deeper meaning.

          Since most aren’t gonna listen here’s the transcript:

          Peter Thiel: I think a lot of the voters who vote for Trump, take Trump seriously, but not literally. And so when they hear things like the Muslim comment or the wall comment or things like that, It’s not, the question is not, you know, are you gonna build a wall like the Great Wall of China, or, you know, how exactly are you gonna enforce these tests? What they hear is, we’re gonna have, we’re gonna have a saner, more sensible immigration policy.

          Cut back to John Oliver

          Oliver: Oh, yeah, that is definitely the sense I got from watching those Trump rallies. Yes, while we are all furiously chanting, “build that wall”, we all understand in this context, wall is a clever use of metonymy, or a figure of speech in which 1 word, wall in this example, is used as a stand-in for a saner, more sensible immigration policy. Now, if you will, let’s unpack “Trump the bitch”.

          • ultramaven@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            So you just downvote me, because you didn’t quite understand.

            Brother, I’m happy the government of Finland is strong in the face of Russian fascists. But Republicans are not. And in America today, waving around John Oliver clips about “how obviously America is trash for 18 reasons” only exists to destroy a narrative with Trumpian citizens — those same citizens that wish to use their voting power to demolish the institution. They already have SCOTUS. Technically, they’ve already won the election.

            • Dasus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              So you just downvote me, because you didn’t quite understand.

              Made my drink spill out my nose for laughing so hard.

              No, “brother”, it’s you who doesn’t understand. And this not understanding — willfully so even — is a hallmark of the American spirit.

              Saying “the US has been championing socialist policies for 100 years” is the same as saying “China has been championing personal freedom for 100 years”.

              “Waving around John Oliver America Bad clips” = “I don’t have the cognitive capabilities to pay attention to an award winning journalistic show that sources it’s claims so thus everything addressed in it is shit”

              The US still doesn’t have a direct presidential election, I don’t think you’ve quite understood what that means.

              • ultramaven@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                You’re right, the phrasing is generous. I mean even 100 years ago, it’d be far more about championing white rights. If reconstruction went better… but that’s my point. I think we have differing definitions of the word “championing”. It does not mean to be the best, but rather the support for exists. And America has been pushing for these ideals. In comparison to so some other country, that isnt inundated with capitalist cowboys and slave stories — sure, nice. Even some countries that have those were able to. But still, those in America have championed for social rights, and fundamental programs exist that prove that. You just think it means “best in the world”, and after watching all the Olympics, I forgive you.

                • Dasus@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  I think we have differing definitions of the word “championing”.

                  No, we don’t. You’re trying to pretend we do, to get out of having said something utterly silly.

                  It’s far sillier to try those sort of semantical shenanigans than just admitting to having said something silly in the first place.

                  And America has been pushing for these ideals

                  You had segregation just 60 years ago, you still don’t have limitless sickleave or even mandatory maternity leave. You have homeless people — who actually have jobs — shitting on the streets and dying from completely treatable things like infections, because they can’t afford the insane prices of healthcare. Education is more or less a joke, you’re literally burning books.

                  America has been actively suppressing socialist policies (and complete governments). That’s a fact. Not an argument. Not an opinion. And definitely not up to semantics.

          • ultramaven@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            You’ve never heard of Social Security? I personally think it’s important to highlight the fundamental pieces of government that already work using systems people could classify as “socialist”. You pay in. You get you cut. The government uses everyones money as leverage.

            The context, is the current population is quite literally on the precipice of throwing out modern liberal democracy all together.

            I agree, of course, there are many other components to being human in America that the government isn’t properly established to deal with. But people who already hate the idea of socialism, they should understand that America grew to what it is, what it was, in part because of those policies.

            It’s also a much better story to wrap yourself in than WW2 dominance and trickle-down horse-shit, and the ever-constant reminder of failed reconstruction and native demolition. America came together once, in the darkness of the Depression, to build a foundation. The last several generations, even those that existed when these programs were established, have existed to destroy and steal and gut. But Reagan told us all it was the government’s fault, and in the golden hue of the 1980s, who the fuck needed Social Security? It was those same government programs that saved Americas cities, that built Americas roads. Many of the tracks may be gone, but they’ve all been replaced with internet cables — similarly a public enterprise.

            America is not a socialist country, it’s constitution needs rewritten. But so much of what makes America what it is, what Americans understand America to be, is solely because of social liberalism. And all of these people that are voting Trump, they should understand that. Because Trump literally stands for demolishing all of it.

            • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              3 months ago

              Ok yes. In the 1930s the United States came shockingly close to socialist revolution over the Great Depression and as such we won massive concessions that have been in the process of being eroded since the end of wwii, but especially since the 80s. Such a massive propaganda campaign combined with anti communist crackdowns happened that we basically surrendered social security and couldn’t implement universal healthcare

              • ultramaven@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                3 months ago

                See this guy understands what I’m saying.

                To say that America is “number 1” is not what I was saying, it was that at the heart of the American governmental systems lies a true socialist foundation. That’s why it’s been hammered for so long, because it’s what should have propelled America into the 21st century.

                • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  Like I’m often the defender of the American socialist tradition both on Lemmy and over in America, but I wouldn’t call it a foundation. We have deep socialist roots for sure, but they’re concessions and arguments. It’s the foundational conflict of our nation: a slave empire built on the idea that all men are created equal. It resulted in a breeding ground for anarchists and fascists.

                  Those concessions are important and they led to a lot of prosperity, but don’t forget that by the 50s we had McCarthy. We should’ve toppled it and showed the ussr what communism can be

            • Dasus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              You’ve never heard of Social Security?

              Oh, you’ve never heard of the The Democratic People’s Republic of Korea? As you can see from the name, they’re definitely democratic.

              The US social security is a bad joke compared to other developed nations.

              To say “USA has been championing socialist policies for 100 years” is on the same level as saying “China has been championing personal freedom for 100 years”.

              The US doesn’t even have direct presidential elections, which by the standard of developed democratic nations is extremely weird.

              There’s a lot there I don’t need to comment on. I’m challenging you on your “America has been championing socialist policies for 100 years” comment.

              Compared to European social security and labour laws, US socialist policies and labour laws are pretty much on the level of developing nations — if that.

              Case in point; Among 41 countries, only U.S. lacks paid parental leave

              Are you honestly trying to use public roads as an example of “having championed socialist policies”? Not exactly the most novel or progressive policy, I would say.

              https://www.spiegel.de/international/europe/a-paradigm-shift-in-social-policy-how-finland-conquered-homelessness-a-ba1a531e-8129-4c71-94fc-7268c5b109d9

              Last Week Tonight with John Oliver - Homelessness

              https://www.cbpp.org/research/social-security/social-security-benefits-are-modest

              Social Security benefits in the United States are lower than many other developed countries.

              You have people who are employed full time, some even in two jobs, who still have to live and shit on the street.

              “Championing socialist policies” lol

              • ultramaven@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                I also said a century. I mean when was Social Security setup in your country? I don’t think you understand the ideological war being fought in America.

                • Dasus@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  I mean when was Social Security setup in your country?

                  So nothing I showed matters, the Red Scare doesn’t matter, the current situation doesn’t matter, you ignore (willfully) literally everything that proves your sentence to be insanely inaccurate and very ironic.

                  Most actual paying social security systems started right around WWII. Do you think your “championed for a century” will be correct with the first US social security starting in 1940?

                  https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Welfare_in_Finland

                  In the last years of the nineteenth century, Finnish social policy had as its goal the lessening of class friction. The few existing pieces of social legislation addressed the needs of specific groups rather than of society as a whole.

                  According to the Finnish sociologist Erik Allardt, the hallmark of the Nordic welfare systems is their comprehensiveness. Unlike the welfare systems of the United States or most West European countries, those of the Nordic countries cover the entire population, and they are not limited to those groups unable to care for themselves.

                  We don’t have people (who are employed even) shitting on the streets. We have guaranteed maternity leaves, limitless sick days.

                  Just how brainwashed or ignorant does one need to be to say the US was more a “champion of socialist policies” than the Nordics…?

                  https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_women's_suffrage#:~:text=In 1906%2C the autonomous Grand,women the right to vote.

                  In 1906, the autonomous Grand Duchy of Finland, which later became the Republic of Finland, was the first country in the world to give all women and all men both the right to vote and the right to run for office. Finland was also the first country in Europe to give women the right to vote.[5][6] The world’s first female members of parliament were elected in Finland the following year.

                  You still had segregation less than 61 years ago. And still don’t have the labour laws that are considered utterly basic in most developed nations.

                  I do understand the ideological war fought in America, because I exist on the internet and a significant portion of it deals with US politics.

                  The only reason we’re speaking English now is because you only know English. Ie I know more than you and are accommodating your level of knowledge and trying to get you to improve it.

              • ultramaven@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                3 months ago

                Literal strawman nonsense, look at this man go. I think you should understand that America is attempting to erode a woman’s right to vote. That’s what I’m saying. That all these people that think America should continue down the path of abandoning modern democracy should look into Americas past and understand the points in time in which it has championed for rights.

                Thats the way you use that word. You’re literally admitting you’re ESL and can’t use English as well as I can. You’ve built a massive strawman on this simple fact. Other commentors can see my point. You can’t. Sorry.

                Like I actually can’t believe you’ve built this massive of a strawman, it’s incredible. All because you don’t know the definition of a word. That’s literally all you go back to, as well. Nothing else I say matters. You just masturbate to your strawman, Mr Fin.

                • Dasus@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  3 months ago

                  You don’t understand what a strawman argument is.

                  ESL? No, that’s “English as a second language”. Mine is technically third. My English is better than 60% native speakers (a large 60min test by a professional). And that counts countries which aren’t on the level of developing nations when it comes to literacy figures

                  America is attempting to erode a woman’s right to vote.

                  America has been championing socialist policies for 100 years.

                  So which one do you believe in this one?

                  It’s quite hilarious how often I end up teaching Americans English. While this is my third language, I’m fairly sure I’ve used it longer, more and in more academic contexts than you have. That’s why I don’t make up meanings for words when someone proves me wrong.

                  champion verb

                  vigorously support or defend the cause of.

                  “he championed the rights of the working class and the poor”

                  Once I answered your arse-ignorant “well when did your country” bullshit you got shaken and started shifting your asinine goalposts. The US has never CHAMPIONED socialist policies, let alone even using them. Still don’t.

                  It’s incredibly ironic how you think saying “you got the wrong definition” will work, and how “other commentors can see”. Yes, they can. They will be able to even check the definition (which I’ve linked btw, but you ofc haven’t, as your definition of the word is made up) and see that “champion” doesn’t exactly mean what you pretend it does. :)

                  https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/champion

                  https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/champion

                  Even if you forgo the most used definitions, and try to find a niche one that’s even remotely similar to how you’re using it…? Nah. The closest ones still will have at least “enthusiastic” in them. The way you use it to say “America has been championing socialist policy for 100 years” is incorrect.

                  America has been actively suppressing socialist policies, socialist movements and even socialist countries. These are facts.

                  So I don’t know what “English” you’re using, but here in the real world “champion” doesn’t mean “actively fighting against”.

                  “Mr. Fin”

                  See you can’t even write Finn, which is the demonym for a Finnish person. You use the noun which means a literal fin. Like those things fish have. :D

                  “championing socialist policy”

                  If it wasn’t so worrying that people like you exist, it’d be kinda hilarious.

      • ultramaven@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        I still believe that fits the definition:

        1. An economic doctrine that opposes governmental regulation of or interference in commerce beyond the minimum necessary for a free-enterprise system to operate according to its own economic laws.

        I add the highlighting to point out that in order for a society to stay fair, it must be regulated. If they believe that a free market should be everlasting, they should also believe that enabling the capitalist overclass would be detrimental to that goal. They tend to vote, however, for that same overclass that seeks to destroy the balance, and destroy any semblance of a “laissez-faire” market.

        Like, an example. Trump says he wants to add a 10-20% tariff on all imports. Is that a “laissez-faire” government? However, if you explained to these people, without Fox News, what that meant… rhey’d clearly say it was some planned-economy Argentine shit.

  • Morcyphr@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    3 months ago

    Hmm, I’ve done all of these things and haven’t suffered the consequences you describe. Yes, in the US.

    • nyctre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 months ago

      Yeah but if we don’t get mad at made up situations then we’ll be forced to deal with real issues and that’s hard.