cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/18475086

I’m not against those who work for sex, but the idea to earn for a living doesn’t seem nice. IMO, sex should be for 2 people (or more for others who prefer polyamory) who wants to be intimate/romantic with each other. My point is money should not be the purpose.

  • OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    5 months ago

    Sex work is work, and work (tying your capacity for labor to your continued survival) is bad. Sex workers should be supported like any member of the proletariat

    Sex labor on the other hand? Sure as long as you have removed the exploitive element that comes with work.

    • vzq
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      deleted by creator

      • OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Labor is when you do a thing that has value to society.

        Work is like, a job, where you do labor (or not) and that pays you so that you can spend money to sustain your existence. If you get disabled you can be fired and not have money long term to continue existing.

        People, ironically enough, are more efficient laborers when they aren’t doing it in the trappings of work, so there isn’t any reason for work to exist.

        • vzq
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          deleted by creator

          • InputZero@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            5 months ago

            They are not the only person who uses the words for each other. When I was doing my undergrad I found that myself and my fellow students used them pretty loosely goosey. As a native English speaker I’ve never had any difficulty telling which way a speaker intended labor and work to mean. The context provided enough. I can see how for people who are not native English speakers, but this isn’t an academic institution. In casual conversation either or are appropriate.

          • OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            This isn’t in the context of utility value vs exchange value. This is separating value creation from the mode of production. Work as in workplace not work as in physical process

            • vzq
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              deleted by creator

              • OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                5 months ago

                Can you phrase this as constructive criticism for which are the proper words to use in this seperate use case or do I need to refer you to the constructive criticism handbook?

                Also, establishing working definitions for use in casual conversation is a thing. Please note that I established definitions for their use.

        • vzq
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          deleted by creator