cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/18475086

I’m not against those who work for sex, but the idea to earn for a living doesn’t seem nice. IMO, sex should be for 2 people (or more for others who prefer polyamory) who wants to be intimate/romantic with each other. My point is money should not be the purpose.

  • vzq
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    deleted by creator

    • InputZero@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      They are not the only person who uses the words for each other. When I was doing my undergrad I found that myself and my fellow students used them pretty loosely goosey. As a native English speaker I’ve never had any difficulty telling which way a speaker intended labor and work to mean. The context provided enough. I can see how for people who are not native English speakers, but this isn’t an academic institution. In casual conversation either or are appropriate.

    • OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      This isn’t in the context of utility value vs exchange value. This is separating value creation from the mode of production. Work as in workplace not work as in physical process

      • vzq
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        deleted by creator

        • OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Can you phrase this as constructive criticism for which are the proper words to use in this seperate use case or do I need to refer you to the constructive criticism handbook?

          Also, establishing working definitions for use in casual conversation is a thing. Please note that I established definitions for their use.