• Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    120
    ·
    4 months ago

    Well, if an ex-Clinton advisor says it, it must be true. Oh the statement is “may”, so there’s really no story here because you can never be wrong with a “may”.

    • protist@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Paul Begala is as “Democratic insider” as you can get, and is also an insufferable talking head. The point of getting a message like this out there is to undermine public perception of the Trump/Vance ticket more than anything

      In response to Newsweek’s request for comment on Begala’s prediction, Trump/Vance campaign spokesperson Steven Cheung said that “there’s a reason Paul Beluga [sic] no longer gets paid for his political advice.”

      Lol

      While Haley might have a broader appeal to undecided voters than Vance, her status as the last Republican to mount a primary challenge against Trump, when the former president often referred to her as “birdbrain,” may make the scenario unlikely.

      Lmao

      • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        4 months ago

        I understand what he gets out of it, I don’t understand why someone at Newsweek decided to be his megaphone. There are plenty of functional stories about Vance’s bad positions, hypocrisy, or poor favorability that do the same thing based on information rather than being a stenographer for someone without any real importance or special knowledge. If that’s the story they wanted to write, they very easily could do it, instead they just summarized an already worthless interview.

        These insider ghouls just can’t die.

        • protist@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          How dare you question the journalistic integrity of…Newsweek?

          Newsweek has been vapid and awful for a long time my man. A better question to ask would be why did OP choose to link Newsweek here

      • zigmus64@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        4 months ago

        And many of them still do. It’s a weird useful idiot/political survival thing. He’s their useful idiot to get what they want… but they better play by the new rules, lest they get Penced.

        • theangryseal@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          My imagined conversation when Vance was chosen as VP:

          “I liked how it sounded, Trump-Pence. It’s too bad he’s a traitor. It had a nice ring to it, everybody said so. Do we have a Spence? Maybe a Dense?” “Mr. President, the closest I see is Vance.” “Trump-Vance. I like it. It’s close don’t you think? He’s said some nasty, nasty things about me. But, Trump-Vance? I like it. He’s saying good things now, isn’t he? He’ll do the right thing, he knows what happened when the last guy didn’t do the right thing. He wrote a book, they’re telling me nobody is reading it. Everybody still reads Art of the Deal, imagine that? Vance, Pence, Vence, Pence, we should say it like that. I like it.”

  • mercano@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    4 months ago

    Sure, just remember, if you change who’s on the ticket after the convention, you can’t really complain if the Democrats complain who’s on the ticket before theirs.

    • chingadera@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      They will forget, because fox news is going to upload their only current political memory every day at 6pm.

  • WindyRebel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    4 months ago

    …Democrats had already “set a precedent” by changing their ticket.

    Lol! No they didn’t. That’s like saying I already set a precedent by changing my dinner plans before I committed to a dinner place.

    Also, dude - you can’t even decide who your VP is, how can anyone expect you to make actual decisions? I’m not voting for him anyway, but my question still stands.

    • Plopp@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 months ago

      Also, dude - you can’t even decide who your VP is, how can anyone expect you to make actual decisions?

      You think they care? In a first past the post system like that with only two viable parties you could have Jesus himself vs actual Hitler and it would still be close to 50/50.

  • Fedizen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    4 months ago

    Having no principles undermines her only appeal. The moment she accepts a trump VP offer is the moment she lights any remaining credibility she has on fire.

  • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    4 months ago

    Too bad Donald Trump won’t replace Donald Trump. I’d prefer if he picked a real anti-government type, like Commander Biden.

    • tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      If trump pulled a Nero and literally nominated a dog (or horse or something) as his VP that might be the closest I’d ever come to… respecting is the wrong word, but at least appreciating just how openly his display of giving absolutely zero fucks about anyone other than himself would be.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Hah. The other day, my wife said, “it must really suck to be a Secret Service agent and deal with Trump- but at least he doesn’t have any dogs.”

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    4 months ago

    Paul Begala- the guy who sat there nodding along with everything Jon Stewart said as he berated both him and Tucker Carlson on Crossfire. Just totally aware of how awful he was.

  • Drusas@kbin.run
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    4 months ago

    Guess that’s why she doesn’t like that a whole bunch of her supporters are now supporting Harris.

    • protist@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 months ago

      Unfortunately for her, a whole bunch of her supporters supported her because they hate Donald Trump.

  • lennybird@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    4 months ago

    I genuinely thought this would’ve been his pick to begin with.

    But even if he does, I think it can only backfire. Remember, the vast majority of sexist scum fall under the MAGA banner. Doing that shows Trump is weak to those same people and now he begins pulling away from his own base.

  • mctoasterson@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    4 months ago

    This would just further illustrate the futility and ornamental nature of the 2 party system and the way the parties nominate candidates.

  • OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    4 months ago

    He would probably become president if he had chosen Haley but there is just zero percent chance he acknowledges he was wrong. This is a Democrat making up theories, not a leak familiar with his thinking.