…Democrats had already “set a precedent” by changing their ticket.
Lol! No they didn’t. That’s like saying I already set a precedent by changing my dinner plans before I committed to a dinner place.
Also, dude - you can’t even decide who your VP is, how can anyone expect you to make actual decisions? I’m not voting for him anyway, but my question still stands.
Also, dude - you can’t even decide who your VP is, how can anyone expect you to make actual decisions?
You think they care? In a first past the post system like that with only two viable parties you could have Jesus himself vs actual Hitler and it would still be close to 50/50.
Lol! No they didn’t. That’s like saying I already set a precedent by changing my dinner plans before I committed to a dinner place.
Also, dude - you can’t even decide who your VP is, how can anyone expect you to make actual decisions? I’m not voting for him anyway, but my question still stands.
You think they care? In a first past the post system like that with only two viable parties you could have Jesus himself vs actual Hitler and it would still be close to 50/50.
I don’t know that I like your analogy, but I can appreciate the sentiment.
👌 I have the best 🫲🫱 analogies
Right. I think this messaging would target the undecided though. We know minds on left and right are made up already.