The New York congresswoman said that the justices' refusal to recuse from certain prominent cases “constitutes a grave threat to American rule of law.”
  • Asherah@lemmy.world
    217·
    4 个月前

    I’m voting for Biden. Not happily, not even simply neutral on the matter. I hate that I have to vote for Biden.

    If AOC ran, I would not be even a little reluctant to vote for her. She reminds me of Bernie.

    • Zerlyna@lemmy.worldEnglish
      142·
      4 个月前

      I’m voting for the Biden administration. It’s more than just him. We need them all.

      • cmbabul@lemmy.world
        26·
        4 个月前

        I’m voting the same way but more because we need to not have the other administration, we need much more that the current admin but we also do not have the luxury of being picky

      • noevidenz@infosec.pub
        58·
        4 个月前

        AOC is currently 34 and her birthday is in October, so she will actually be old enough to be president by the time of the election.

        • finestnothing@lemmy.world
          8·
          4 个月前

          Yeah, but you know people will throw out misinformation saying she can’t actually become president because she’s 34 and some people will believe them and stick with Biden or someone else who we know for damn sure is over 35 and it’ll just split the vote unless Biden (and any other big names on the left) drop out

    • lengau@midwest.social
      7·
      4 个月前

      This is her first election where she’s eligible to run for president. I wouldn’t be surprised to see her run in 2028

    • eldavi@lemmy.ml
      1·
      4 个月前

      If AOC ran, I would not be even a little reluctant to vote for her. She reminds me of Bernie.

      same here

      i’m struggling to get myself to vote for biden; i vacillate on it every day and i wish my history and future of enduring biden et al.'s policies wasn’t clouding my decision.

  • Neato@ttrpg.networkEnglish
    132·
    4 个月前

    Fuck yeah. Probably won’t go anywhere with a traitorous house majority but it’s worth it to try and get them on the record.

        • Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          3·
          4 个月前

          Check out the excellent podcast “Behind the Bastards”’s episodes on Clarence if you haven’t already. They’re amazing. (And horrifying)

      • LadyAutumnEnglish
        17·
        4 个月前

        The term corruption doesn’t even begin to cover it. The man is a paid actor. A rubber stamp for republican party political positions.

        • KevonLooney@lemm.ee
          4·
          4 个月前

          He needs to do a one-on-one interview where he explains himself. The American people are demanding it.

    • Kerred@lemmy.world
      19·
      4 个月前

      I am still hoping for the day to see someone of the same party convict a politician.

      If anyone has any cases I’d love a link!

      • solrize@lemmy.world
        12·
        4 个月前

        Nixon resigned a day(?) after the impeachment articles were filed, because House Republicans told him that he didn’t have enough support in the party to not get convicted.

        • kent_eh@lemmy.caEnglish
          2·
          4 个月前

          If a judge is a politician

          The fact that is a thought that is reasonable to be expressed is part of the problem. Judges (and the justice system in general) should not be political in the slightest.

          • Kerred@lemmy.world
            1·
            4 个月前

            It’s a shame too as I believe the original intention for judges to have a lifetime position was so they no longer had to be concerned with allegiance in an election.

            But I assume those lawmakers didn’t know how fanatical or greedy judges could be lol

    • lone_faerieEnglish
      4·
      4 个月前

      It’s giving Bojack Horseman.

      Our main story: ominous and anomalous accusations against Hank Hippopopalous. Who is this anonymous “Diane Nguyen” and what does she have against our beloved Hippopotamus? Joining me now is Hippopapalous apologist, and armchair sociologist, Cardigan Burke.

  • Snot FlickermanEnglish
    62·
    4 个月前

    If you’re going to do the thing with replacing Biden as the candidate, you couldn’t get better than AOC, who will be 35 before November.

    I personally think replacing Biden this late is a bad move even though I already think Biden sucks. But I grit my teeth and voted for the fucker just like I did with Clinton, because the alternative is literally insanity and fascism. I just don’t realsitically seeing the party coalesce around anyone new at the last minute. Organizing Democrats is like herding cats, being a big tent party sucks noodles.

    • Ghostface@lemmy.worldEnglish
      49·
      4 个月前

      Just keep repeating, Biden may not be the best, but his administration has been fantastic!

      In comparison to the other party… Not just Biden you are voting for the administration. Supreme court justices Which affect everyday life!

      • Snot FlickermanEnglish
        14·
        4 个月前

        Exactly this. So the party doesn’t do what I would personally prefer. I still prefer whatever the fuck they’re doing over outright fascism.

      • Bluetreefrog@lemmy.worldEnglish
        9·
        4 个月前

        He knows how to delegate to people who are smarter than him. He also knows the importance of ‘tone at the top’ in getting the best out of his team. This is what makes him the better candidate.

      • balderdash@lemmy.zip
        4·
        4 个月前

        Good domestic policy. Bad foreign policy. Or have we all collectively forgot about the wars?

        Edit: You all were very loudly criticizing Biden on Israel a few weeks ago, but fine, I guess Lemmy has moved on.

        • kent_eh@lemmy.caEnglish
          3·
          4 个月前

          have we all collectively forgot about the wars?

          The wars that he didn’t start? The wars that the aggressors are ignoring what Biden demands?

          The ones where Trump is buddy-buddy with those ordering war crimes?

          Those wars?

          • balderdash@lemmy.zip
            1·
            4 个月前

            Israel in particular, yes. Before the debate everyone was criticizing Biden for continuing to financially support a genocide.

            But I guess nobody cares about Palestine now.

      • balderdash@lemmy.zip
        2·
        4 个月前

        Shhh, don’t mention other countries. Nothing to see here, just keep listening to the establishment democrats telling us anything other than Biden is impossible. And then four years from now the fight for democracy will continue.

    • Count042@lemmy.ml
      13·
      4 个月前

      I’ve seen this criticism of replacing Biden often recently “it’s too late! We won’t have time!”

      Putting aside for the moment that it isn’t late at all and complaints that it is feel like talking points, Biden IS old. The stats on someone his age dying that year are extremely high. There is a good chance he dies before the election.

      If there isn’t a plan to deal with that fairly likely possibility, then there isn’t a plan to win.

      Anyone in a position of power in the DNC making this claim is them confessing their own incompetence.

      • Snot FlickermanEnglish
        10·
        4 个月前

        Hey man I’ve been dealing with the shitty outcomes of the politicians who lead this party being unwilling to listen to the public until well after the public has been proven right for my entire adult life.

        I said Biden was too old in 2020. He’s even too older now. The party didn’t give a fuck and has spent their time hiding it and fucking us out of having primaries.

        Who do you think will choose the new candidate? The same super delegates who gave us Hillary Clinton? It won’t be a people’s vote at the convention, it will be delegates, many of which are party apparatchiks.

        Do you think the people who hid Biden’s issues this late in the game will suddenly make a good choice? I don’t. The party fucked us into this position and I do not think they are capable of unfucking us, sorry. Biden is who we have, alive or dead.

          • Snot FlickermanEnglish
            2·
            4 个月前

            Hey I’m not the one pretending that the same people who fucked this up can save us. That’s you. I’m just accepting where we’re at.

            You gotta be naive if you think the party is going to hand the reigns to the people now after *checks notes… about thirty years of this shit.

            But sure, have the party replace Biden with another fucking loser just like him, we’ll see how that goes.

            • Schmoo@slrpnk.net
              1·
              4 个月前

              If they do replace him, it will just be with Kamala. The only thing up in the air would be who to appoint as her running mate.

              IMO they should just do it ASAP. I honestly think Kamala would attract way more voters than Biden. She certainly has her issues but no worse than Biden’s and she’s way better on optics.

    • Kit
      11·
      4 个月前

      I fangirl for AOC but she ain’t ready. Give her 4 more years at least.

      • MeekerThanBeaker@lemmy.world
        27·
        4 个月前

        She’s more ready than Trump is who was already “president.”

        That said, I would rather her be in Congress longer because she can be a voice longer. After 8 years of being president if elected, she wouldn’t then want to become a senator or whatever. That would pretty much be it for her in politics outside of ex-president things… and she’d only be 43.

        I’m also sure Kamala would be pissed if AOC were to get the nom instead of her. Not that that matters.

    • balderdash@lemmy.zip
      5·
      4 个月前

      Guess we’ll have to wait and see. If Biden stays in and young people don’t show up to vote, everyone will blame voters and not the DNC; even though the entire argument for Biden is his supposed electability.

      We’re in such dangerous waters right now that we might as well throw caution to the wind and try to get a woman elected POTUS. At least that would energize the base.

      • CoggyMcFee@lemmy.world
        6·
        4 个月前

        Wow, that is exactly the opposite expectation and take from me. If young people don’t show up to vote, I expect they’ll blame the DNC instead of themselves, even though the purpose of voting is getting the best outcome for your future and not about liking people or being sold on a brand.

    • stoly@lemmy.world
      67·
      4 个月前

      It’s a public repudiation in a way that is extraordinarily rare and highly symbolic. Nothing may change but shots have been fired across bows.

        • Asafum@feddit.nl
          6·
          4 个月前

          Fucking seriously…

          “We’re” stuck in the same stupid fucking mindset the founding morons were where they relied on shame and integrity when designing our government…

          We’re dealing with a party that only believes “might makes right” and we’re wagging our fingers at them as if they give a shit at all…

          • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
            4·
            4 个月前

            How they haven’t learned this lesson after 10 years of “OMG can you believe Trump did XXXXXX!” posts every single day I will never understand.

      • Verito@lemm.ee
        9·
        4 个月前

        We’re well past it meaning anything. These rebukes, reprimands, and censures are political theater. Fascists laugh when you use the rigged system against them.

          • TheLowestStone@lemmy.world
            2·
            4 个月前

            You’re funny. There’s nothing even remotely pro-Russia in my post history nor have I made any effort to convince anyone not to vote.

            I just think our country is fucked because of… well, pretty much everything that’s happened over the course of my life.

      • SLVRDRGN@lemmy.world
        11·
        4 个月前

        Ah but then you’re admitting that impeachment has shown itself to be of little effect for a (current) moment. It’s still incumbent on us as a society to hold those responsible for this accountable. And worse, it looks like somehow the impeached person is a likely prospect to become president again.

    • derpgon@programming.dev
      8·
      4 个月前

      Oh it is a democracy, but not “direct democracy”. We don’t choose what happens, we just choose who decides what happens.

      Those in power bribe, threaten, and lie, and we can’t do shit about it because the actual hood guys end due to harassment or threats and can’t deal with it psychologically.

      • finestnothing@lemmy.world
        20·
        4 个月前

        Oh it is a democracy, but not “direct democracy”. We don’t choose what happens, we just choose who decides what happens.

        Still not a democracy, you just described a Republic, which is what we’ve always officially been even if die hard patriots prefer to say democracy

        Those in power bribe, threaten, and lie, and we can’t do shit about it because the actual hood guys end due to harassment or threats and can’t deal with it psychologically.

        Plutocracy in action

        • TheKingBombOmbKiller@lemm.ee
          12·
          4 个月前

          Oh it is a democracy, but not “direct democracy”. We don’t choose what happens, we just choose who decides what happens.

          Still not a democracy, you just described a Republic, which is what we’ve always officially been even if die hard patriots prefer to say democracy

          What are you talking about? The people electing representatives that makes the final decisions is called “representative democracy”. A republic is a form of representative democracy. A constitutional monarchy, like you find a lot of in Europe, is another form of representative democracy that fit the original description, without being republics.

        • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
          9·
          4 个月前

          I think more than a few “patriots” feel the need to point out that we’re a republic, not a democracy.

          “Democracy isn’t the objective; liberty, peace, and prosperity are. We want the human condition to flourish. Rank democracy can thwart that.”

          Because the idea that people should get a say is ridiculous.

          It’s figuring out how to maintain dominance with a minority of support. And so, in that sense, I think the rhetoric is really telling. It’s a way of rationalizing the further entrenchment of minority rule.

          “Too much democracy” interferes with their plans.

        • derpgon@programming.dev
          6·
          4 个月前

          Either way, society is fucked until we got nothing left but to revolt - but that will never happen, as the carrot is being dangled all the time.

        • sparkle@lemm.eeCymraeg
          5·
          4 个月前

          It’s a Republican Democracy… a Democratic Federal Republic… whatever you want to call it, point is it’s both a Republic and a Democracy. They’re not mutually exclusive categories. In fact, most categories you can use to describe the structure/type of a government aren’t very exclusive categories. Governments are very complex and can be a lot of different things, so we have a lot of different terms (and different usages of those terms) to narrow a description down.

    • Crikeste@lemm.ee
      6·
      4 个月前

      Would you like the capitalist who used to say the n word or the capitalist who used to say the n word? Please participate in democracy 🥺🥺🥺🥺 lmao

  • tisktisk@piefed.socialEnglish
    34·
    4 个月前

    Wasn’t trump impeached twice? What does this even mean concretely?
    Not knocking the sentiment, just questioning the practicality

    • finley@lemm.eeEnglish
      48·
      4 个月前

      Put simply, an impeachment happens in the House of Representatives and is akin to an indictment by Grand Jury. If successful, the proceeding then moves to the Senate for trial, where the party is either convicted or acquitted. A conviction would mean removal from office and the possibility of facing criminal charges.

      Trump was impeached twice, but he was not convicted either time.

      • balderdash@lemmy.zip
        3·
        4 个月前

        Also good to note that the Constitution doesn’t mandate the Senate convict the president under any circumstance other than treason.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.worldEnglish
      19·
      4 个月前

      Gives Dem voters something to rally around in the lead up to the election…

      Like. This is literally the time and place for performative actions, but I swear it’s like everyone’s forgot what the word “campaign” means.

    • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.orgEnglish
      16·
      4 个月前

      Without getting too technical, and someone please correct anything that may be represented incorrectly: It’s basically like a trial. The House is the prosecutor, and jury and the Senate is the judge. The plaintiff is the United States itself, and the defendant is the political figure (president, SC justice, etc)

      The House gathers / presents evidence and tries them then renders a verdict (Impeachment)

      The Senate is responsible for sentencing or acquitting. Without a 2/3 majority voting to remove them from office, the impeached is acquitted.

      In both of Trump’s, the House found him guilty of the charges (impeached) but the Republican controlled Senate acquitted him.

      Hard to edit it in on mobile, but see @ricecake@sh.itjust.works 's clarifications below to my analogy.

      • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
        7·
        4 个月前

        Impeachment is the decision to press charges, and the Senate trial is closer to the actual trial.

        “Charged and convicted” -> “impeached and convicted”

        Otherwise a perfectly good analogy. :)

        The distinction only matters for people who bring up due process concerns. The impeachment proceedings aren’t actually a trial, but a decision to have one, as such you aren’t obligated to the same ability to speak in your own defense as you would be at a proper trial. With the Senate trial there’s more expectation of due process because it’s an actual trial.

    • Burstar@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
      7·
      4 个月前

      Unfortunately it means as much as it did for the Trump impeachments. There is zero chance any, let alone enough, Republicans would vote to convict these conservative judges regardless of the evidence and validity of the charge(s).

  • barkingspiders@infosec.pubEnglish
    25·
    4 个月前

    Fantastic, I know this probably won’t go anywhere but this is the right thing to do regardless. SCOTUS needs to be held accountable to the American people for their actions. We grant them extraordinary power and that must come with extraordinary accountability. Holding them to a lower standard than any judge in a lesser court is ridiculous. The higher the court, the higher the standards should be.