• Apeman42@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      5 months ago

      I mean, this but unironically? No one should be seeing homeless people because they shouldn’t be homeless.

      • Xeroxchasechase@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        But they do exist, something systematic must be changed for then not to exist. (Public housing, maybe?)

        But until than, what?

        • archomrade [he/him]@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          5 months ago

          There’s maybe two problems with this:

          • public housing is a part of the picture, and so are public libraries. The solution is certainly not to cut library spending just because there are homeless people using it
          • Thinking there being homeless people around is an issue that needs solving is itself pretty bigoted. Like, maybe you have a problem with people who haven’t showered for a while? or people who use the library for personal activities because there are no better places for them to do them? But ‘these people are a problem’ itself becomes problematic because you’ve consolidated those qualities you find objectionable into a class of person, and that makes it really easy to forget/misplace/dismiss the humanity those people deserve.

          It’s a common attitude, so don’t feel like i’m picking you out personally to scold. More people should be aware of how that attitude dehumanizes people experiencing shelter insecurity.