• Apeman42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    5 months ago

    I mean, this but unironically? No one should be seeing homeless people because they shouldn’t be homeless.

    • Xeroxchasechase@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      But they do exist, something systematic must be changed for then not to exist. (Public housing, maybe?)

      But until than, what?

      • archomrade [he/him]@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        5 months ago

        There’s maybe two problems with this:

        • public housing is a part of the picture, and so are public libraries. The solution is certainly not to cut library spending just because there are homeless people using it
        • Thinking there being homeless people around is an issue that needs solving is itself pretty bigoted. Like, maybe you have a problem with people who haven’t showered for a while? or people who use the library for personal activities because there are no better places for them to do them? But ‘these people are a problem’ itself becomes problematic because you’ve consolidated those qualities you find objectionable into a class of person, and that makes it really easy to forget/misplace/dismiss the humanity those people deserve.

        It’s a common attitude, so don’t feel like i’m picking you out personally to scold. More people should be aware of how that attitude dehumanizes people experiencing shelter insecurity.