• @cheese_greater@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    1
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    I guess if I were to spill over to the non-numerical and semantical or more linguistically axiomstic representation here,:

    1. The divisor is a number (1)
    2. The dividend is a number (0)
    3. A number divided by another number consequently produces another number
    4. Does mathematics line up with CS on the whole NaN designation? I might be conflating fields or… I dunno. I’m sure there’s a palpable issue here you guys can lead this ass to override whatevers going on in my head