• rtxn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    102
    ·
    9 months ago

    You block ads because of privacy.

    I block ads to cause the greatest amount of financial damage, purely out of spite.

    We are not the same.

  • green_square@yiffit.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    71
    ·
    9 months ago

    Steal. To take another person’s property without permission or legal right and without intending to return it.

    Take. To remove someone or something from a particular place.

    I’m not taking anything, I’m merely creating a copy of it. I would 100% download a car if that meant cloning someone’s car for free and without damaging the original one.

    • BlemboTheThird@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      9 months ago

      This doesn’t get said enough. Piracy is only damaging if I would have paid to get the thing in the first place. If I’m pirating something that I would have avoided entirely had I needed to pay, literally no one is taking any losses.

      • green_square@yiffit.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        If it creates a copy of it, like a car-sized star trek replicator, sure. It wouldn’t matter who’s car you’re cloning as long as no harm is done to the original car.

  • li10@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    I don’t know why some people sugar coat it.

    I’d pirate anyway because I don’t wanna spend money, and so would a lot of people who instead choose to hide behind excuses.

    • EdibleFriend@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      9 months ago

      I have seen these big long winded speeches about how immoral it is to sell copyrighted material and how some dumb shit like spiderman should fall under the ‘free sharing of ideas to better humanity’ and blah blah blah.

      Bro. We are thieves. We are stealing because its easy and the products cost too much.

    • rtxn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      9 months ago

      It also depends on who’s behind the product. Good indie game with one or a few developers - never. Adobe - I consider it a moral obligation.

  • Drinvictus@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    9 months ago

    I used to NOT advocate for piracy. I still pirated shit because I did not want to pay but I never suggested that it was the right thing to do. But the way that these corporations try to fuck their customers more and more I feel like paying for something is basically tipping a billionaire. Their pockets are bottomless and they will figure out a hundred different ways to make sure they don’t pay taxes on those billions while the rest of us have to pay a third of our hard earned cash in taxes. Piracy is not only OK, I think it is warranted at this point.

    • Chriswild@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      When subtraction is equivalent to addition because capitalists needs to justify owning the means of production.

    • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      “Copyright infringement”: when a shitty set of laws, known collectively as copyright laws, infringe not just on people individual rights but also on the advancing and progressing of society.

      300% real definition

  • notannpc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    9 months ago

    I just enjoy having 1 app to browse the content I want to watch instead of a dozen different apps that suck in their own special ways.

    • The Overlord@tsck.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      plex won’t download properly on my phone, but it’s not because some big company decided that I’m not allowed to do that, it’s just cause the devs suck.

  • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    9 months ago

    If those corporations are allowed to do it, then so are we.

    Even the corporation that made all those “You wouldn’t download a car” ads are now downloading actors for their movies.

  • aldalire@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    obligatory “if buying isn’t owning, then pirating isn’t stealing”

    and also there’s a moral argument for data preservation here somewhere

  • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    9 months ago

    I think piracy is the inevitable result of restricting access.

    Given that music services like Apple music, Spotify, YouTube music, and others, all have access to just about anything you might want to hear as soon as it’s released, no matter what service you use, you get access. Pick your favorite.

    Meanwhile in the world of TV and movies, everything is everywhere. If you want to pay for access to whatever you want to watch, you’re going to be subscribing to just about every video streaming service in existence to achieve it, because everyone has exclusives. Don’t like the website, user interface, search system, algorithmic suggestion system, mobile app, webpage, price, etc. Of a service? Too fucking bad, they’re the only one who streams that show you like, either pay too much for cable and sit on your couch every week at the same time to watch it there (if that’s even an option… and over pay for it), or use the stupid streaming service you hate to watch it. Your alternative? Piracy.

    IMO, piracy is inevitable as long as access is this limited.

    I don’t know anyone who pirates music anymore.

    I know of plenty that pirate TV and movies.