• NounsAndWords@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    285
    ·
    10 months ago

    The riot occurred at a clothing manufacturing and seafood processing factory

    That…is an interesting combination

    • BossDj@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      241
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      I read this somewhere else on Lemmy recently (sorry for comment steal):

      American companies that are trying to dismantle unions need to understand that unions were a compromise to protect the companies. Because this is the alternative.

      • chknbwl@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        65
        ·
        10 months ago

        This issue extends to politicians as well. If you replace “Ancien Régime” with “Oligarchy-flavored Republic” it’s almost like we’re living the beginning script of the French Revolution here in America. That should induce quite the pandemic of sweaty palms in D.C. If that Oaf gets reelected, we’re gonna have a Louis XVI on our hands… and we all know how that went down…

      • FraidyBear@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        ·
        10 months ago

        The great part about history is sometimes there’s no need to find a quote when there’s tons of evidence! Here’s a few:

        France, George Besse killed in 85’ due to his “revolutionary” turnaround of a company that included mass layoffs.

        United States Labor Wars which spanned a century of bloodshed and violence. The Labor Wars included the Battle of Blair Mountain where the largest private army in US history was formed and approximately one million rounds were fired.

        There’s a reason your history classes were boring, there’s a reason they opt for American propaganda instead of facts, and there is a reason companies are shitting themselves over union talks. Both the best and worst part about being a history buff is knowing the facts they don’t want you to hear. Be a History Buff with me Limmings! We never meet up, there are no dues, you have no deadlines or tests, and you get to earn dark secrets you can use to torture your friends and family with. It’s great!

        • BlindFrog@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          10 months ago

          If I could carry around a Limmings History Buff Fellowship member card with qr code links to sites like these, it’d be just handy dandy for the torturing-friends-and-family part.

      • workerONE@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        What do you mean? Communist podcasts I listened to consider them Communist, Internet search says the BBC says they are Communist.

        Edit: you all like to downvote instead of having a conversation. Everybody hasn’t studied every subject, try sharing a little of what you know instead of discouraging discussion

        • CaptainSpaceman@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          54
          ·
          10 months ago

          Theyre a classless society with no currency?

          You sure they arent a capitalist dictatorship disguised as Communist?

          • TopRamenBinLaden@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            22
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            You make some good points. They most definitely have currency and a lower working class with an upper government official class. I would not consider them communist at all. North Korea is just an authoritarian capitalistic hellhole, that tries to sprinkle in one or two socialist policies to maintain the illusion of pursuing communism.

          • workerONE@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            I see in reading more that NK is pretty far from communist. But I think people have imagined communism to be something that it never could be. I don’t see how society could exist without money. I see that Soviets thought that eventually they wouldn’t need money but I think this is unrealistic and I don’t see that existence of money in a society could be used to determine if it’s communist or not. .

            • CaptainSpaceman@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              11
              ·
              10 months ago

              Marx said that socialism is the gateway for communism. Bring the means of prouction to the working class, then youd be able to make the next transition to communism.

              In any case, there are no societies currently that meet the primary criteria for being called socialist OR communist.

            • Gabu@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              10 months ago

              I don’t see how society could exist without money.

              The fact you are incapable of understanding something doesn’t change truth.

            • ScaraTera@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              10 months ago

              Exactly, satisfying the highest standard is not a criteria for categorisation. It’s the same as saying USA isn’t capitalistic because governament regulations are still a thing

          • mea_rah@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            This is the problem with people promoting socialism. They tend to compare idealized version of socialism with real version of capitalism. And such comparison inevitably leads to unrealistic conclusions.

            The problem is that real version of socialism is what you see in China or Cuba or former USSR. The argument with “we haven’t done socialism right” is the same as “we haven’t done capitalism right”.

            I have been born in socialist country and to this day I can see negative consequences of that era. And the obvious reason why ideal socialism can’t exist - people. Same reason why capitalism sucks.

            Edit: To people downvoting me: Your fake internet points have no meaning, but I love the irony of it. You can’t even keep the illusion of classlessness and equality in an internet thread, yet you are somehow convinced you could run a country like that. You’d be locking people for life in your communist paradise just for having different opinion and you know it.

            • CaptainSpaceman@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              15
              ·
              10 months ago

              Definition of Socialism: the workers own the means of production.

              Which country were you born in where you owned the means of production?

              • mea_rah@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                10 months ago

                I was born in country where intellectuals were in jail and uneducated workers were put to management positions, because they should own the means of production or some bullshit like that. You can imagine the end result of that.

                And again, this is the same “that wasn’t true socialism” argument. Obviously it wasn’t. The socialism as per your definition can’t exist on a country level. You can see it being implemented on a small company level (think family owned businesses) but the bigger it gets the more the cracks show and it just does not scale.

                • frezik@midwest.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  10 months ago

                  You don’t need money going to shareholders in order to scale. You need management structure. Even anarchists would say they’re against unnecessary hierarchy, and at least a little structure is generally necessary. Top management does not need to be paid 300-to-1 over the average worker. Nor do they need to specifically represent shareholders, which is what a CEO is.

            • barsoap@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              ·
              10 months ago

              Lenin himself called the system he instituted state capitalism, it was supposed to be a transitory state as Marx said (and the Bolsheviks were very big on historical materialism) that first you have capitalism, develop productivity, then communism would follow naturally as a consequence of resolving capitalism’s inherent contradictions.

              The gaslighting started with Stalin, who invented the term “really existing socialism” to make it doubly clear that it was neither real, existed, or was socialism.

              The closest any society ever got to communism isn’t via the Bolshevik “dictatorship of the proletariat” (aka dictatorship of the state bureaucracy), but via Anarchism. Horizontal organisation, abolish hierarchies. Very early revolutionary Russia qualifies until the Bolsheviks abolished councils in practice, Rojava qualifies, Chiapas qualifies, revolutionary Spain (until Bolsheviks teamed up with fascists to kill it off), revolutionary Ukraine (until the Bolsheviks – I think you see the pattern).

              • frezik@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                10 months ago

                Interesting tidbit I picked up on an Andrewisim video recently: organizations from the Marxist-Leninist-Maoist branch of the left are particularly vulnerable to falling into cult behavior. It’s a reason to consider the whole branch to be bad and cut it right off. If not that far, then at least view organizations from that branch with a lot of criticism.

              • mea_rah@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                10 months ago

                Yes, exactly it always fails, because it just does not scale. It’s an idea, that can’t exist in reality on a country level. You can point to Freetown Christiania as an example - a small anarchist commune, that already shows some major cracks in its structure. I mean, just grow family business a bit and you can already see structures and hierarchy emerging.

                • barsoap@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  Rojava is about 4.6 million people, about as many as Kuwait. About 11 Icelands worth of population.

        • AutistoMephisto@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          10 months ago

          It’s because they haven’t winnowed the State as Marx described. The problem is that once certain members of the Proletariat get their hands upon the levers of power, they find they rather like it and don’t want to let go.

    • xenoclast@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      North Koreans in China showing the world how it’s done. Who had THAT on their bingo card ?

      Americans forget their middle class existed for the short time it did exactly because of actions like this.

      You don’t fight the enemy sitting on your toilet reading Lemmy posts. (It’s still fun though)

    • poo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      10 months ago

      I literally said to myself “hell yeah!” reading the headline, and then opened to find it was the top comment 😂

    • RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      Until China has to kill all of them because North Korea won’t take them back.

      Welcome to the Rednecks, North Koreans.

        • orrk@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          10 months ago

          What exactly are you confused about?

          That the Chinese and North Koreans would rather kill 2000 people than pay them? Or The history and origin of the original Redneck?

          • NateNate60@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            10 months ago

            I don’t think they’ll be killed. Neither North Korea nor China are that stupid. I do think that they’ll be forced to work until they drop and paid nothing or paid a pittance, even by Chinese standards, with the bulk of the value of their labour being split between the company that they work for and the Chinese and North Korean states.

            • orrk@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              10 months ago

              dude, they decided to have a little uprising and decapitated their boss (who in systems like china gets the job because of government connections), they have done a lot worse for a lot less

  • Yewb@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    10 months ago

    This is a coal mine canary of the future of china, civil unrest and wealth inequity for everyone!

          • Yewb@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            USA is reserve currency for a huge chunk of the world, they have to all fail with their local currency first, you need a common ground for international trade - the US is still a reserve currency because oil mostly.

            • ComradeSharkfucker@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              So you think the civil collapse of two governments with over 2.8 billion citizens collectively would be a good thing because it would make improve the logistics of trade? /gen

    • NateNate60@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Watch the so-called “Communist” Party leaders decry this and crush it violently. Marx is rolling so much in his grave that if they attached a generator to him they could power half of China with the electricity

      • jimbolauski@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        Do you believe the conditions between US workers and North Korean workers in China are similar?

        • Clent@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          10 months ago

          Wrong question; don’t give a fuck.

          Anyone who accepts their servitude because someone else’s situation is worse is a fucking moron.

          So the question is: Are you a fucking moron?

          I’m not. Are you?

          • jimbolauski@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            I’m not so sure the 4th part or your statement is true.

            A much higher percentage of US workers are satisfied with their jobs, that’s why they don’t riot.

      • magnetosphere@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        10 months ago

        😂 good point. I’m just thinking that since it’s NK, the “manager” probably didn’t have much more freedom or authority than the employees did. I’d be very surprised if he benefited from the embezzlement. I’d expect the higher ups to take it all.

        • Eldritch@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          45
          ·
          10 months ago

          North Korean workers in China. The Mexicans of China if you will. The plant manager wasn’t likely going to buy mega yachts. But finding someone with so little regard for their fellow humans carries a pay bump there. Just as it does in the western world.

          • Chriswild@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            They can also just refuse to do the job because it hurts the laborers that work for them. They got laborers doing this because they didn’t treat them like people. I don’t think they should expect to be treated well when they treat others poorly.

    • BOMBS@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      10 months ago

      you dont know what that guy has done. maybe he’s killed workers himself.

        • BOMBS@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          10 months ago

          I agree with you, but I also understand the French people taking King Louis and Marie Antoinette to the guillotine. Just saying, the situation there might be so intense and oppressive, that the killing could at least be understood even if not just. We just don’t know enough :/

          • rudyharrelson@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            I agree the situation is oppressive and untenable, but the plant manager isn’t the same as a King. We don’t know if the plant manager had the actual power to fix anything, given the corruption and embezzling going on behind the scenes. A King is the top of the pyramid, this guy wasn’t necessarily, so I don’t condone his murder based on pure speculation. The French people didn’t have to speculate that the King and Queen were directly responsible for the peoples’ misery and oppression.

            We just don’t know enough.

            I would say that’s a good reason not to condone mob violence, not a reason to support it.