In 2020, the United States experienced one of its most dangerous years in decades.

The number of murders across the country surged by nearly 30 percent between 2019 and 2020, according to FBI statistics. The overall violent crime rate, which includes murder, assault, robbery and rape, inched up around 5 percent in the same period.

But in 2023, crime in America looked very different.

“At some point in 2022 — at the end of 2022 or through 2023 — there was just a tipping point where violence started to fall and it just continued to fall,” said Jeff Asher, a crime analyst and co-founder of AH Datalytics.

There are some outliers to this trend — murder rates are up in Washington, D.C., Memphis and Seattle, for example — and some nonviolent crimes like car theft are up in certain cities. But the national trend on violence is clear.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      9 months ago

      You’re right, but that’s not why people think violent crime is high. They think that because the media knows that when they report on crime, they get eyes on them and eyes on them mean they can sell more advertising. So every violent crime they can report on gets reported on and in ever-increasing numbers to make it look like the amount of violent crime is at least steady, if not rising.

      And, of course, that helps “tough on crime” politicians (mostly Republicans) as well.

      • Lightfire228@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        9 months ago

        I wonder how tough it would be to set up an “open source” style news media / investigative journal. Ideally using crowdfunding

        Something without an incentive for metrics chasing

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          The problem in a nutshell is us. They wouldn’t chase crime if it didn’t get more people tuning in.

          ETA - there’s no reason you couldn’t, just like there’s 2 or 3 projects trying to debias news.

        • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Besides public radio, Wikinews is established (albeit quite dead)! No funding for contributors to the latter, so you might be left trying BuyMeACoffee/Patreon (or a grant?).

          I think you can go to NPR, or blog solo with a Patreon, or get with a few other journalists like 404 Media did - founded 5 months ago, already breaking some stories, sometimes collabing with other journalists. Wikinews is better for casual internet-journalists but it’s hard even just reading a bunch of sources and compiling a story effectively. It’s rarely updated; very few want to/can do that work for free.

  • MicroWave@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    89
    ·
    9 months ago

    Interesting observation:

    Rachel Swan, a breaking news and enterprise reporter for the San Francisco Chronicle, says there are “two really visible crises” in the downtown area: homelessness and open-air drug use.

    “And honestly, people conflate that with crime, with street safety,” she said. “One thing I’m starting to learn in reporting on public safety is that you can put numbers in front of people all day, and numbers just don’t speak to people the way narrative does.

    • Uranium3006@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      46
      ·
      9 months ago

      I’ve seen lots of attack ads that seek to protray homelessness as a crime issue, and not a poverty issue

      • moistclump@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        9 months ago

        Poverty and health. Health linked to poverty. Sometimes the other way around. We’re in a health and housing and affordability crisis.

  • stoly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    9 months ago

    People around here and Reddit get really angry when you point this out. It’s weird, it’s like people want things to suck.

    • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      9 months ago

      its cause all they hear in their news bubbles is doom and gloom and constant violence and shooting.

      and cant take a second to think about the fact that these reports are from across the entire fucking country, or even beyond its borders, They just focus on “news says things bad brrrrr”

      This is a constant argument in my family, and for this exact reason. No amount of statistical or empirical evidence convinces them, and the response is “If thats true was is the news always reporting violence?!”

    • GladiusB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Well I think part of it is WHO is being killed when there are crimes. And that is children. No one can get behind that.

  • Cyrus Draegur@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    9 months ago

    i was looking for numbers though. specifically how crime in 2022 and 2023 compare to BEFORE the big spike that happened in 2019 and 2020. If crime is still higher than it was in 2018, then this local minimum isn’t going to matter as much.

  • 🐍🩶🐢@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    9 months ago

    I still don’t believe it, at least not where I live. Once you have someone in your friend group get murdered, for no good fucking reason, it becomes harder to pretend everything is ok. It doesn’t help that the local news reports another stabbing or shooting most days of the week.

  • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    9 months ago

    They almost never do. There was a brief spike there a few years ago, but overall, violent crime has been going down for decades.

    • Mnemnosyne@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      9 months ago

      If you want to challenge actual data and claim it’s not correct, you need data to show that. If you don’t have data to challenge that claim but you’re still suspicious, you can say we need more, better data and we should make efforts to gather it.

      But simply asserting that the data is wrong with nothing to back you up but the hot air coming out of your mouth is crap and anyone with two brain cells to rub together can see that.