It would seem the design that can survive the most extinctions would be the clear winner in the end.

  • carl_dungeon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    10 months ago

    I’d say adaptability would be priority in an environment that is subject to frequent change. Environments that are largely static probably favor efficiency.

    • Fluke@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      10 months ago

      Yeah. Countless examples going both directions. I wouldn’t call crocodilians super adaptable, but they are so well tuned for their specific environs that they’ve been largely unchanged for 94 MILLION years.

      I would argue that being warm blooded makes an animal more adaptable. Interestingly, it seems cold blooded reptiles evolved into warm blooded archosaurs which eventually led to cold blooded crocodilians. Tellingly, these active warm blooded ancestors are all extinct in favor of the passive, cold blooded, low adaptability ambush predator.

      In the opposite direction, the adaptable rat has done much better than the countless specialized species that have disappeared since the industrial revolution and human explosion.

      • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Cold blood probably makes a lot of sense for an aquatic ambush predator that needs to lie motionless for most of its life. Keeping that body warm the whole time wastes a lot of energy, especially under water. If you conserve energy, you can go longer without food which is important if you are waiting for food to come to you rather than seeking it out.