• EnderMB@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    11 months ago

    For several reasons:

    • It’s where people are. It’s the whole fucking point of social networks! If the user base drops to a point where people are no longer there, I’ll go to the next network.

    • If I were to boycott everything owned by a cunt, I’d probably live in a mud hut, naked in a park somewhere.

    • The self-gratification on here doesn’t make me want to use Twitter any less.

    • For all it’s faults, there isn’t a legitimate competitor. Mastodon has no users and has a less intuitive interface than Twitter. BlueSky is…I couldn’t even tell you what the fuck it is. Threads is basically a meme project by Zuck (another billionaire cunt) to toy with Musk, and it’ll be dead within a year.

    FWIW, I fucking hate Musk. I’m a software engineer, and one of the few big tech companies I wanted to work for was Twitter. Their branding was cool, they worked on cool tech problems, and I heard great things about their workplace culture back in around 2010-2012. Musk fucked up a company I liked.

    I’ve long considered Musk to be a fraud, and to be honest Twitter is the least of his problems. He’s clearly a very sick man that probably needs professional help above everything else.

    If he were a normal person, someone would’ve cornered him and coerced him into medical detainment. If people thought I had a coke problem that affected my ability to conduct meetings and think clearly, I’d be out on my ass. Musk can get away with it because he owns his companies, and no one cares enough about him to help him. He’s a dancing monkey that doesn’t realise that people are laughing at him, not with him…

      • Tyfud@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        11 months ago

        How to build your infrastructure with so many redundancies that not even Elon could bring your site down when he randomly started unplugging shit at one of their data centers, perhaps?

      • EnderMB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        11 months ago

        The infrastructure around sending small chunks of data around at that scale, at a time when people were sending larger files/messages around was interesting, enough so that even to this day “design twitter” is the canonical system design interview question.

        They were also initially behind some cool things in the front-end space, like Bootstrap.

    • JimmyBigSausage@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Thanks for the reply. Serious question… why has a Twitter/X equivalent not been developed with all of the brilliant-minded people out there, including those laid off by Twitter and other companies? Would it be more about marketing the app?

      • EnderMB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        It has, but they don’t have the users. I think that most social networks are a “right place, right time” phenomena. If Twitter or Instagram were to be released today, with all of its current features, it would probably be DOA.

        BlueSky and Mastodon are solid, technically, but neither have cornered a part of the market that speaks to the average person. BlueSky is “we’re Twitter, but with no users”, and Mastodon solves a problem that few care about.

            • JimmyBigSausage@lemm.eeOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              True, but one thing different they did was tie it in to Instagram, more info gathering to the same FB/Meta company. Not a stand-alone product by a new company (fresh new thing).