• @HiddenLayer5@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1096 months ago

    Less funny when you realize it’s mostly banks, government agencies, and militaries still using it.

    • @EuroNutellaMan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      616 months ago

      I’d say more likely it’s labs, hospitals, and other scientific stuff where you have to deal with old instruments cause lack of money. I’m fairly certain the military uses some other OS, I believe NATO uses Solaris for example.

      • @minyakcurry@monyet.cc
        link
        fedilink
        256 months ago

        Also that machine only works under very specific circumstances, so you fear changing anything in case your entire protocol breaks and you have to start from scratch.

      • @Ross_audio@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        156 months ago

        “Windows for Submarines”

        It’s XP for Vanguard subs. I really hope none of them provide any telemetry for these stats though.

        • @EuroNutellaMan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          216 months ago

          doubt they’re connected to the internet. In fact I’d wager 99% of shit running windows XP is not connected to the internet (and shouldn’t be)

      • @Narauko@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        56 months ago

        The current company that owns the old model installed in your hospital and sells the new version, bought the company that bought the company that made the version you have and can’t update the firmware and code to work on a modern OS because all knowledgeable staff were lost in the buyouts.

        The best they can do is sell you the new version that does the same thing your current working version does for $500,000.

        Maybe they even have a new ecosystem that they want you to move to, because they don’t make support/subscription revenue with the current stand alone server that moves the image or telemetry results from the machine to the viewing workstations and records database.

      • Flying Squid
        link
        fedilink
        26 months ago

        If the U.S. military is anything like it was in the 90s, they may very well still be using Windows XP for all kinds of things. My mother-in-law ran an army reserve center through the late 90s and they were using DOS machines well into the Windows era because the army wouldn’t update their computers.

    • @Deiv@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      126 months ago

      I highly doubt it. I work for a large bank, and it’s all W10/11 due to the need for continuous security patches/currency updates. Large banks don’t mess around with EOL software that has a risk of vulnerabilities

      • @AnAngryAlpaca@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        26 months ago

        Large banks don’t mess around with EOL software that has a risk of vulnerabilities

        Well, more complex modern software has an higher risk of (yet unknown) vulnerabilities.

    • Virtual Insanity
      link
      fedilink
      English
      106 months ago

      And medical. Suppliers if CT, MRI and X-Ray gear are notorious for wanting to sell new gear and not providing software updates to work on new operating systems.

      • @chiliedogg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        11
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Mainstream support ended 15 years ago. Extended security support ended 10 years ago. The last version to have any kind of update at all was their embedded OS version for things like cash registers, with the last security update 5 years ago.

        So it’s wildly insecure against any new attacks targeting an OS that’s largely used by major corporations, governments, and medical facilities that are juicy targets for theft and ransomware attacks.

      • @EuroNutellaMan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        3
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        It’s moreso that they have some abandonware that only works on windows XP.

        Windows XP itself is abandonware and you shouldn’t use it in any other case, just use Linux if you don’t like newer windows. You certainly aren’t doing any photoshopping on XP nowadays so that’s no concern.

  • LazaroFilm
    link
    fedilink
    English
    966 months ago

    After XP, Windows focused on adding crap to their aid that use unnecessary resources for crap things. I remember the Aqua look on Vista that sucked the life out of computers. Let’s not talk about Windows Me. Then 8 was a weird interface that no one liked and also not compatible with older machines. So XP is the most stable Windows os that can run on older devices.

    • Boozilla
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1286 months ago

      XP still had the designed-by-engineers vibe. Since then, Microsoft got completely taken over by dipshits with marketing MBAs.

      They now code Windows to impress executives and shareholders with how much they can harvest data and manipulate customers into using their stupid Store and so on. They stopped caring about the experiences of power users, or even casual users.

      They don’t want the OS to work for us. They want us to work for them.

      • @KingBoo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        176 months ago

        Very well said.

        Do you have any suggestions for people wanting to go back to an XP feeling?

        A particular distro of Linux, etc.?

        • @gaterush@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          19
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          I second the recommendation of giving Linux Mint a shot. I didn’t use XP extensively but Mint is low hassle and gets out of your way.

          I’m not sure it has quite the same feel, but closest I can think of that is also approachable coming from Windows. Obviously a lot of other distros also satisfy the “built by engineers” vibe.

        • Boozilla
          link
          fedilink
          English
          126 months ago

          I have a lot of respect for Linux and use it here and there, but I am by no means an expert on it. The best thing I’ve done with it so far is running a Pi Hole at home.

          Unfortunately, my job involves using MS Windows. A lot. After I retire…soonish…I hope to take some time and learn Linux better.

          For my day-to-day Windows misery, I find that ShutUp10 does a great job of toggling off the bullshit you don’t want running. And it’s easy to toggle things back on if you ever need to. It’s a free program you can download and run. I send them a little money every year out of gratitude, but donations are completely optional.

          Some FUD mongers will tell you that ShutUp10 ‘breaks’ Windows. That’s simply not true. It puts all the Windows settings you can change yourself in one easy-to-find place. Things that are normally scattered all over the UX and the registry.

          While you could mess some things up using it if you’re not careful, it’s very good about color coding and letting you know which toggles are best to turn off, which ones are a little questionable, and which ones you should leave turned on (unless you know what you’re doing and can take the risk). I have used it for years now, on multiple PCs, with zero problems. It doesn’t make Windows 10/11 GOOD but it makes them less horrible.

          https://www.oo-software.com/en/shutup10

          • @brbposting@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            16 months ago

            Britec09 from the video there is quite skeptical - sounds like he prefers ShutUp10. With Atlas, he worries about large security impacts for small FPS gains.

            Good watch, thank you!

      • @agent_flounder@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        156 months ago

        Though enshittification was coined, I think, with online services in mind, this is a perfect example of the process as it applies to an OS.

        • Boozilla
          link
          fedilink
          English
          66 months ago

          Completely agree. For some reason that word tends to trigger a few gatekeepers on here. But I think it fits.

        • @Emerald@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          1
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          The enshittification of windows is because of its online services. Copilot AI, “telemetry”, ads, etc.

    • @umbrella@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      106 months ago

      To be fair, vista and 7 had a lot of QOL improvements too.

      I dont see the point of 10+ though, they pretty much just added fluff.

      • LazaroFilm
        link
        fedilink
        English
        16 months ago

        They had QOL but I remember my machines running significantly slower. And that was not worth the extra QOL.

    • XP was a pretty good running OS with plenty of software and games. I held out till 10 was out for a bit and there were programs I wanted to run that required it.

    • Rhaedas
      link
      fedilink
      66 months ago

      WinME was that OS I ripped off a brand new laptop and replaced with 98SE so it would function correctly. When it crashes and hangs right out of the box…

      • LazaroFilm
        link
        fedilink
        English
        16 months ago

        Haha. Same here my new computer BSOD’d right out of the box with Me. Freaking HP Pavilion.

  • DreamButt
    link
    fedilink
    English
    706 months ago

    I guinely hate windows as a product. But man XP was a banger for it’s time

    • @dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      136 months ago

      As usual I think that sentiment was retroactive, certainly once Vista came out. At launch, people hated the Fisher-Price look of the Luna default UI. Like, a lot. The switch to the NT based kernel for the home version of Windows also caused a shitton of people’s hardware and peripherals not to work anymore because they needed new drivers and the manufacturers of said gadgets – if they were still in business – could not be arsed. Some of this could be alleviated by bullying that hardware’s Windows 2000 drivers into working with XP. Some of it could not.

    • @hughesdikus@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      26 months ago

      Windows has its ups.

      The only problem people should have with it is that it’s on 70% of ALL desktops which is about half a billion too many.

      A fair competition should be there. Linux, Mac and Windows should have around 33% market share in an ideal world.

      You may count whatever Google is doing or Samsung/Huawei can do as separate in a dream world.

    • ares35
      link
      fedilink
      176 months ago

      i have several clients with xp systems (or even older), still, mostly for CNC applications, bulk trailer and tanker loaders, and similar. i keep recommending upgrading the systems, they keep balking at the high prices from their vendors.

      • @HeyJoe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        116 months ago

        That seems to be the same decision our company has made on some stuff. In a way the old licensing model really hurt some businesses. They got so used to spending once and holding onto stuff for so long they basically cut the budget for maintaining and upgrading the same systems. Now it’s all considered profit and there’s no way will they let that money be purposed for something that, in their eyes, still works.

      • @scottywh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        16 months ago

        I supported a production line as recently as 2015 that had an industrial paint mixer that still ran on NT4 Workstation

    • @averagedrunk@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      36 months ago

      Not as prevalent these days, but a lot of EMR/EHR was built on XP. Some of those companies went out of business and the clinics using the software never upgraded because they couldn’t get the data out into another system.

      • ares35
        link
        fedilink
        26 months ago

        it was always possible to do… just not at the price they were willing to pay.

  • Psaldorn
    link
    fedilink
    466 months ago

    Newest versions of windows 11 make it incredibly hard to find the screen that shows all your network adapters. It is now easier to use device manager to disable and reenable an adapter.

    How do I know? Because all the shit tier screens and tools that offer to help you with a network issue didn’t work. ONLY reenabling the NIC did.

    Had to do it on my whole network

    • @Passerby6497@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      216 months ago

      Learn the ways of the run prompt: ncpa.cpl launches you right to the classic network adapter control panel screen. I have to get in there so often that I’ve taught myself plenty of those little shortcuts because MS can’t leave shit where it was.

      • @dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        26 months ago

        …And it all has to be there for legacy compatibility, because some Fortune 500 company somewhere has some rickety piece of shit in-house “enterprise” software that relies on some obscure aspect or another of a past Windows version.

        • @The_v@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          46 months ago

          I am sort of partial to those rickity old systems that force them to keep legacy software compatibility.

          I can still load up and use a program that was written 20 years ago for windows XP.

          It also gives third parties like classic shell or startallback the ability to restore all the functionality that the newest start menu disaster tries to push.

        • @areyouevenreal@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          66 months ago

          Disabling and enabling a network adapter using a GUI is trivial on most Linux desktops. So not helping Microsoft’s case.

        • @Crack0n7uesday@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          2
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          Did you use cmd with elevated admin privileges? Try right click cmd and run as admin if you don’t know what I’m talking about. Windoze stopped running cmd with elevated privileges sometime around Win7. From a security perspective it makes a lot of sense to do that as default, even though it can be a bit of a pain for home users that expect to have admin for everything they do.

    • @skizzles@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      96 months ago

      Why don’t you just use control panel?

      I never use the windows settings menu unless I absolutely have to because, like you insinuated, it’s really not that great.

      Control panel on the other hand is still there and will get you exactly where you need much quicker.

        • Psaldorn
          link
          fedilink
          26 months ago

          It’s definitely looking like a possibility. I do my work on Linux machines but only use win for games. If I can play my main community games it might be time to make the switch for good

          • PrettyFlyForAFatGuy
            link
            fedilink
            2
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            if you dont play games that use anticheat you’re probs okay.

            most everything else either works with proton out the box or with some small tweaks.

            protondb is the best resource for linux gaming imo

        • @skizzles@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          26 months ago

          Yeah, my primary is Kubuntu. I have windows on the side for the few games I have that I need it for.

      • MrScottyTay
        link
        fedilink
        English
        4
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        You can also just search “network” and the screen they want is either the first or second result. I rarely ever go into any kinds of settings menus anymore, i just search on the start menu.

          • MrScottyTay
            link
            fedilink
            English
            16 months ago

            Because windows 11 is an updated version of windows 19 and windows 10 is an updated version of windows 7/8.1.

            Each one of them has had holdovers of previous versions of windows. And each one has tried to bring in a new standard to bring them all together but they’ve always moved on to the next standard before finishing it. Windows 11 has actually came the closest but we’re not there yet and because it’s actively replaced old methods of doing things in this process it feels more fractured than before because we’re not used to looking in the new places for them.

            • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet
              link
              fedilink
              16 months ago

              I feel like making important changes was easiest with XP. It feels like they’re trying to obscure administrative functions behind layers of abstraction.

    • @FrankTheHealer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      56 months ago

      Kind of feel like Windows 11 is trying to appeal most to people who only use Windows for stuff like Outlook and Excel.

      If your job requires any niche or specialized software. Or if you need your Windows system for managing networks and stuff like that, you’re probably better off sticking with older windows or jumping to Linux.

      Obviously it’s not as easy as just switching to Linux, especially for larger organizations etc. But it gets easier with every new version of Ubuntu, Fedora etc.

  • @marine_mustang@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    256 months ago

    When I was working security for a hospital they wanted to send imagery from an MRI (or maybe CAT, I forget) upstairs to be interpreted without allowing any network traffic to be able to reach the host machine because it was running XP. I asked why, and they told me that in order to replace it the vendor was requiring a $7 million replacement of the whole MRI.

    • @Takios@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      136 months ago

      That should be illegal and the vendor held accountable for security incidents happening because of this.

    • The Picard ManeuverOPM
      link
      fedilink
      66 months ago

      I’ve worked in hospitals that still run DOS based programs for certain things. It’s madness.

    • @AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      26 months ago

      Same shit is starting to happen with cars. No way to get the new headunits without replacing the whole car. I know Porsche offers electronic upgrade kits, but I can’t think of any others that do.

  • Flying Squid
    link
    fedilink
    19
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    I don’t even know why people use Windows 10 (or 11) other than momentum.

    I haven’t used Windows for years, but my daughter’s new online school required either a Windows 10/11 computer or a Mac and we can’t afford even a new decent Windows notebook, let alone a Mac, so we ended up getting a refurbished Thinkpad running Windows 10 from NewEgg.

    Windows 10. Is. Annoying. As. Fuck.

    We are constantly getting interrupted by unnecessary popups (or were until I took the time to disable everything I could think of, which was a pain in the ass).

    After running updates, it made me go through a bunch of screens turning down paying for things. Twice. And those popups still asked me about paying for things. Motherfucker, I already paid $300 for the computer, I’m not paying you shit.

    And wow is stuff counterintuitive in how to do it compared to either any Linux GUI I’ve tried or Mac OS. Just trying to figure out how to get to a File menu is baffling half the time.

    I don’t blame anyone for using XP over that shit. Let alone Linux or even a Mac.

    • @kshade@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      226 months ago

      I don’t even know why people use Windows 10 (or 11) other than momentum.

      Security updates. That’s it, that’s the only reason I recommend anyone was unwilling or unable to switch operating systems all together to move to Windows 10.

    • @Psythik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      66 months ago

      For me I use Win11 for one reason: Auto HDR. Fixes every issue I have with HDR in other OSes cause it just works.

      • Flying Squid
        link
        fedilink
        16 months ago

        I can see that, but is it really worth running it as an OS other than for that specific use? Because if not, you can just run it in an emulator or on a partition when you need that.

        • @Psythik@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          3
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          Well I play a lot of HDR games and watch a lot of HDR movies, so for me the use isn’t exactly “specific”. I’m using HDR all the time.

          But to be honest, I’d love nothing more than to switch to Linux fulltime. The game support is finally good enough for me, but I need my HDR. Emulation isn’t an option cause HDR doesn’t work that way, and I already dual boot Mint and Win11. But right now my usage is about 90% Windows and 10% *Nix. Can’t wait for the day when I can finally switch those percentages around.

  • FartsWithAnAccent
    link
    fedilink
    176 months ago

    There’s tons of legacy shit still running XP and there probably will be for at least another decade.

    • @tiramichu@lemm.ee
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      9
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Vista was fine, apart from the performance. I had a fairly beefy machine for the time so I hardly noticed, but on lower spec machines it was an absolute dog.

      Kinda felt like an unoptimised prerelease version of Windows 7

    • squiblet
      link
      fedilink
      26 months ago

      I didn’t use windows from 1999 through 2008, when I bought a laptop which of course came with Vista. I used it a bit and thought, well, for a wintendo, this isn’t horrible.

    • @Hotzilla@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      13
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      I don’t think so, main reason is XP was still heavily backwards compatible to 95, 98, even DOS based software. Many control software for industry only support to XP, because jump to windows 7 was too heavy. If anything supports windows 7, it is really easy to port to windows 10. Main reason is the driver support, because win 7 having new driver architecture.

      Windows 10 will be the next “forever stuck” OS, because end of Internet Explorer on it means that there are tens of thousands of industrial software that require IE, and cannot ever be ported to win 11.

      • @AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        26 months ago

        Yup, same reason modern games all get ports but some old ones never will. Everything has the same architecture now so it’s easy to port an Xbone game to W10 and the new Xboxes.