• @Chemical@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    936 months ago

    The more we look, the more we find, the more the crazy’s love him. I don’t get it. Will be happy when he is no longer in front of my face at every turn.

  • @jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    896 months ago

    For those wondering why this is a big deal:

    US Constitution, Article 1, Section 9, Clause 8:

    “no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State.”

    Emolument:

    https://en.m.wiktionary.org/wiki/emolument#Noun

    emolument (plural emoluments)

    (formal) Payment for employment or an office; compensation for a job, which is usually monetary. synonyms ▲quotations ▼Synonyms: compensation, fee, payment, remuneration

    • @AstridWipenaugh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      6
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      I wonder how this will go down in court. It clearly says “person” and the money was paid to a corporation. Trump’s businesses aren’t holding any office, therefore the constitution wasn’t violated. That’s obviously horse shit, but they’re arguing that the presidency isn’t an office (CO ballot case). So if they win that it seems likely SCOTUS will drop a nuke on the emoluments clause too.

      • @Rakonat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        106 months ago

        According to Citizens United Supreme Court ruling, Corporations are people. So lets put it to the test. If you can give unlimited campaign contributions to a PAC through a corporations, than a corporation, and it’s executives, would equally be liable under the law for violating the constitution.

  • DigitalTraveler42
    link
    fedilink
    English
    46
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    “It’s treason then…”

    Meanwhile Left wing voters in 2024: “So this is how liberty dies . . . with thunderous applause”

    • Gormadt
      link
      306 months ago

      And entirely too many lefties, “I don’t like either candidate so I won’t vote.”

      Or worse (and thankfully a much smaller number), “I’m going to let trump get power again so things can really bad really quick so we can get The Revolution™ started.”

      Picking the lesser of 2 evils is unfortunately how our system functions. And not voting at all ensures that the candidate you hate the most has an easier time winning. And I’d prefer if the worst candidate doesn’t get power so we can actually change things for the better.

      • TimeSquirrel
        link
        fedilink
        116 months ago

        “I’m going to let trump get power again so things can really bad really quick so we can get The Revolution™ started.”

        “Revolution now?”

        “Not at the moment, I have too much shit going on and I don’t need to go to prison or anything for some dumb shit. There are people depending on me.”

        Destroys society

        “How about now?”

        • Gormadt
          link
          46 months ago

          “I can’t, I’ve got to keep my head down to survive”

      • Optional
        link
        fedilink
        106 months ago

        I’m not buying that yet. I think the whole “oooh gen whatever is turning on biden” is a truckload of bullshit printed up by The Usual Suspects.

        Voter participation has been very high even recently.

        • @lolcatnip@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          56 months ago

          I will definitely vote for Biden, but his disgusting simping for Israel makes me a lot less inclined to donate money to his campaign. I might end up only donating to anti-Trump PACs instead.

          • Alien Nathan Edward
            link
            fedilink
            English
            16 months ago

            if you’re voting for someone and not fighting with them after they win you’re only doing half a democracy. people talk about “the lesser of two evils” but there’s no realistic situation in which you agree with the person you’re voting for on all things, so there is no strategy that doesn’t include the “lesser evil”. The fact is that Biden sucks shit. The other fact is that Trump is much worse on all things, including whatever you happen to be pissed of at Biden about. So the choice seems to be “do I spite the guy who pissed me off but actually make the situation worse, or do I do what’s in my power to make the situation better, vote for the guy who pissed me off as a stopgap and then do everything I can to bully him into actually doing the right thing?”

        • TechyDad
          link
          fedilink
          46 months ago

          Also, it is easy to say “I’m not voting for Biden, I want someone else” right now. There aren’t any consequences.

          But come November and suddenly the consequences become more immediate. Many more people say they will vote third party than actually do it once in the voting booth.

  • @rubicon@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    376 months ago

    Can I just say that this is my absolute favorite picture of him. It’s the exact same expression my kids made when they shit in their diapers.

    • TechyDad
      link
      fedilink
      216 months ago

      I knew I recognized that expression.

      “Are you pooping?”

      “Nnnnnnoooo?”

      “You’re pooping aren’t you?”

      “Not anymore!”

  • Chainweasel
    link
    fedilink
    English
    216 months ago

    The only “services” Trump provided during his presidency were under Putin’s table.

  • @squirrelwithnut@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    9
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    So what is the current count up to now for Trump willfully and blatantly admitting to corruption and/or treason? It’s in the double digits now, right?