we need teleportation frankly

    • Gormadt
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      62
      ·
      1 year ago

      Flying cars

      Nah fam, I’m good on that one. I see enough carnage on the roads with normal cars.

      • SonnyVabitch@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 year ago

        Then again, self driving cars would be much safer off the ground. None of that ‘which pedestrian should we run over’ ethical dilemmas that car industry moral philosophers and actuarials currently grapple with.

        • SkepticalButOpenMinded@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          The Trolley problem doesn’t go away in the air (not that it’s that big of a deal to begin with). In fact, it might even be worse. Your car is falling. Do you crash into the crowded street or the crowded building? Which one? The destructive potential is much higher. If safety is really a concern, don’t you worry about giving every person a missile?

          Flying cars “solve” a non-problem, because long distance highway travel is already the least dangerous. Most accidents are at intersections and points of conflicts. But eventually flying cars need to land and be near other cars and people. There will still be traffic jams, vast fields of parking lots, and cities made uncomfortable to actually walk or exist in.

          • SonnyVabitch@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Both of these things can be true. I said it would be safer, you say that when there is trouble, it’d be a much bigger trouble. However, crashing with a rolling car would be a much more common occurrence than with a flying one, where it would basically only happen as a catastrophic malfunction. Nobody would walk out unexpectedly in front of a flying car.

      • SkepticalButOpenMinded@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, flying cars are even worse than land cars. Imagine how much less efficient parking and take off would be. Imagine all those cars circling the sky waiting to park. Would we need to cut down all the urban trees? Would we build even bigger parking lots? Huge runways and landing pads everywhere? It sounds like hell.

      • losttourist@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        With flying cars we’d have the opportunity to take the human factor out of the equation, which is the cause of the vast majority of car crashes.

        Imagine we had never invented cars and trucks and highways and were just doing it now. Do you think we’d take these two ton death machines and say “let’s put them under control of an individual person, with all the distractions and fallibility and other problems we know we suffer from”? Or would be instead design a system where every single vehicle has a computer that is constantly in communication with all the other vehicles around it, and can react far quicker to any issue than a person could.

        The problem with self-driving cars is that they have to operate in a world where there are also human-driven cars, and cyclists, and pedestrians, etc. If the only things on the road were computer-controlled, it’s a completely different scenario. And that’s what we’d have with flying cars. At least I hope so!

        • speeding_slug@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          1 year ago

          I would honestly hope we would be smart enough not to go the road of the car again but instead invest in good public transportation, at least in cities and other densely populated areas. Flying cars, even automated, would be a terrible idea from both risk and energy/climate change perspectives.

        • Pons_Aelius@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          1 year ago

          No. Since it is impossible, any discussion on it is just speculation. You are saying it is a high tech suicide booth based on how it is portrayed in Trek…Which is fiction.

          Same with time travel.

            • dsemy@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              15
              ·
              1 year ago

              What if physicists find a way to bend space such that you’d be able to move instantly (through some sort of portal) between two extremely far places while staying at a normal speed?

              Just because quantum teleportation has “teleoprtation” in its name, doesn’t mean it’s the only possible form of it.

              Don’t blame others for arguing without thinking if you haven’t given it proper thought yourself.

                • dsemy@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  17
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  You have really strong opinions on this considering most of this is purely theoretical.

                  AFAIK no wormholes were ever observed or created, and there are many theories on how they maybe created (artificially or naturally) and/or traversed.

                  Also, any I think any reasonable person would say you teleported if he saw you going through a portal.

                  We also don’t understand consciousness, so no one really knows what happens when you use a ‘suicide booth’ like you imagine. Maybe it’s even possible to just teleport your consciousness too.

                  You really have no fuckdamn idea how long I have been thinking about this exact subject.

                  Neither do you.

            • ShadowRam@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              12
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              See, that’s the problem with modern science reporting. People are so easily confused.

              No. We have never teleported atoms.

              We did the equivalent of a fax machine.

              We took an atoms current state, sent that information down traditional communication lines, and copied it’s state perfectly to another atom.

              They call it Quantum Teleportation, but it has nothing to do with Sci-Fi teleportation as most people think of it.

    • dustyData@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Flying cars. We have the tech already.

      Yeah, they’re called helicopters and we rightfully regulate the shit out of them because flying without proper certifications and inspections is extremely dangerous for the public. Because when one idiot crashes, it won’t only be him going out, but he will cause destruction and carnage on the ground.

    • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Star trek teleportation is a suicide booth, but wormholes can do the same thing. Just bend space to bring two points together, step through the hole and unbend. Teleportation without disassembly.

    • Otter@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Medicine is a huge emerging field right now, and there’s so much potential for benefit from humanity depending on how well we can govern this new tech

      • smart drugs / treatments specific to a patient’s genetics
      • on site genome testing during infections
      • gene therapy
      • organs & prosthetics
      • detailed monitoring (while relatively non-invasive) in intensive care, notifying HCPs early before issues develop
      • very fast vaccine development