I used to downvote fairly often on Reddit as a sign to disagree or to push down really disgusting bigoted comments. And to be honest, it became a habit to just downvote without replying. However, now that I’m on lemmy and not Reddit I’ve been actively trying to not instantly downvote things and instead move on or take the time to reply. Has anyone else been trying to do this?

  • Yuki@kutsuya.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t understand this mentality to begin with? Downvoting without context is like cursing at a random person in public and then drive away.

    • bl4ckblooc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s not really a great comparison. Downvoting is a way to say you disagree with someone without getting into an argument. And if I think of my personal experience, most of the posts/comments I would downvote on Reddit are about things that there is no point getting into an argument about.

      • nogooduser@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Downvoting is a way to say you disagree with someone without getting into an argument.

        Is that what it’s supposed to mean though? I understood it to mean that the comment either didn’t contribute to the discussion or it was actually detrimental to it.

        I regularly used to upvote people that I replied to even if disagreed with them.

        Obviously, if they’re being dicks then that’s a downvote.

        • Karlos_Cantana@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yes, that’s what it’s supposed to be for, but with the influx of Redditors that have their own definition of what it’s for, it’s being totally misused.

        • bl4ckblooc@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think 10 years ago that is what is did actually mean, and it’s what it’s supposed to mean. But in the last 4-5 years there has been a shift as Reddit got more popular and as they changed how upvotes and downvotes actually affect comments.

          With so many more people joining the site, the opinions got a lot more diverse and vehement. People hitting the downvote button got a lot more prevalent. This doesn’t mean that upvotes weren’t happening as well(I’ve seen posts that had one of the bottom comments rise all the way to the top after new information comes out or the video hits all).

          So, anyways I think you are right and that’s what it was supposed to mean, but it has changed meaning for the most part I think. And I think there has been a lot more assholes on the other site anyways, so it was definitely being used on/by them.

      • doctorcherry@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Votes being public has made it possible to learn a bit about how people interact with posts. I’ve always used the downvote sparingly and I think that is how most people operate, downvoting only what doesn’t contribute to discussion and upvoting what I agree with. But it seems a minority downvote very frequently. There are some accounts that downvote the vast majority of posts in certain communities. Sometimes these accounts have zero posts and comments. Which is pretty odd - disagreeing with so much while never sharing your opinion.

        • Andreas@feddit.dk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I didn’t bother to check who it is because I’m not petty enough, but there’s a guy on my instance who downvotes everything. I think some people are using downvotes to “hide read posts” as voting counts as reading a post.

      • LogarithmicCamel@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think it’s a great comparison. You can punish someone without providing a reason, and so the poster just thinks other people are arseholes. You did it just because you can. You might think there’s no point arguing back, but the person who wrote the comment obviously thought it was a good point.

    • TeryVeneno@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s not a really a mentality per se, it’s just a lot less mental effort to downvote and move on. Especially when you consider all the downvote bots and the fact that downvotes were not public. Downvoting in general was really devalued and people used it to just remove content from their face as opposed to engaging with it. Lemmy feels different in that regard.