Google search failed to even find a hollywood movie, even after 1 hour of attempts. I don’t really care about the movie, but I am terrified by the prospect that google now ceased to function on this basic level. Why is this happening?

I understand the explanations of seo and other stuff like spam content. But why are there NO relevant results at all.

I wouldn’t mind having to start wading through results at page 2 or even 10 but now it utterly fails to find even the most basic things.

Things you found on the first attempt even just a year ago. Now they are effectively hidden.

To me functionally the entire internet has now vanished. I cannot access anything that I am searching for. Might as well not exist at all.

Has anybody found a way around this?

Is this on purpose? Is this an attack on the free internet, herding people to just the top 5 sites like facebook, youtube, tiktok, and so forth?

Are there search engines that still work?

    • FlatFootFox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      71
      ·
      11 months ago

      Have Brands™ started astroturfing Lemmy yet?

      I’m not completely sold on Kagi yet. I’m still in the trial period right now. But paid services can be a tough sell online. I figured I’d be up front about the costs rather than wait for the inevitable “$10 a month for search!?” comment.

      • eric@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        11 months ago

        I haven’t seen any obvious astroturfing yet, but your last paragraph really did have the vibe of a smoothly transitioned paid promotion. Not saying it was, but even the comments that you haven’t fully bought into it made it feel even more like one of the more honest paid promotions.

      • berkeleyblue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        11 months ago

        I read this same sentiment two days ago; Google doesn’t work for me.

        Not sure what they are on about. I can find things I‘m looking for on Google in under a Minute 9 out of 10 times and I tend to use it quite heavily tbh…

        • 9bananas@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          11 months ago

          if you’re searching for something general, like, i dunno “dishwasher cleaner” or something, it spits out usable results.

          but as soon as a query becomes technical in nature, like troubleshooting IT problems, it’s a straight up nightmare.

          the reason it’s so bad at searching for anything very specific is their attempt to “figure out what you really mean”:

          and google does that by… ignoring what you typed and changing your search prompt behind the scenes without telling you and without any options to change it.

          and putting it in quotes rarely improves searches anymore, only spits out more garbage.

          point is: google is basically dead for any specific searches and only really works for searches that amount to “i want to buy thing. show me thing.”

          • diannetea@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            I had this weird hardware issue with my desktop and I could not find results for it on Google about a year ago, and I had searched for it a bunch of times previously as well and couldn’t find anything relevant. My boyfriend searched for it on Google on his computer and found a result with the information we needed and i immediately fixed it.

            Guessing my “custom” results were poisoned by something at some time, but it prevented me from finding the answer I needed, and I didn’t think to log out at the time.

            Super done with Google tbh

      • bravemonkey@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        I signed up for Kagi after the trial. I’m very subscription adverse, but this one was something I don’t mind paying for.

    • Steve@communick.news
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      It’s great that DDG doesn’t track a users searches. It really is.
      But at the end of the day, it’s still just another ad platform profiting off of companies trying to sell you things.
      And here you are complaining it seems like an ad, when someone’s explaining an alternative ad-free search.
      Just think about that for a moment.

      • ThunderWhiskers@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Also, if we’re being frank, DDG’s results are damn near useless half the time.

        It’s like the opposite end of the SEO spectrum. Whereas Google just anchors onto certain keywords to regurgitate the same 4 listacles, DDG just sees your input for “my lawnmower won’t start” and responds with “lawnmower huh? I dunno here’s the history of John Deere or some shit, fuck off”.

        • AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          I tried using DDG but had even worse results than Google is having right now. I wish it was good, but my multi month trial of it was not impressive.

          It was especially bad for programming. At least Google still finds what I need for that

        • _pete_@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          11 months ago

          Hard disagree with that, DDG searches are accurate about 90% of the time that I use it (which as a web dev is quite a lot) if they aren’t hitting Google with the same term rarely wields any better results.

          • governorkeagan@lemdro.id
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            11 months ago

            I’ve had the same experience as you. The vast majority of the time, I can get the results that I want.

        • ahornsirup@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          It also doesn’t allow you to actually exclude keywords. Which can be utterly infuriating if you’re looking for a specific entry in a franchise or a lesser used definition of something.

        • Steve@communick.news
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          DDG pays Bing to use their API. DDG makes money by placing ads in the results. They do it kind of circularly using Microsoft’s ad system, but they are separate.