• passntrash@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    While I loathe golf courses and am always happy to take the piss out of the “elites”, this feels like something more.

    This might just be the CCP flexing political power over Hong Kong in general, but I’d be curious to see what the primary motivation behind this decision was. Obviously it wasn’t building public housing, that’s just a good cover story with a positive side effect.

    • Not_mikey@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      11 months ago

      the CCP can’t possibly do something in the interests of the people, their must be something dastardly behind this.

      Your just as bad as the tankies who think u.s. aid is just a CIA front, or the Republicans who think welfare is just Democrats keeping black people poor and dependent.

      The u.s government and CCP aren’t just full of villains trying to oppress people, both have the capacity for empathy and compassion and do exercise it often.

      • passntrash@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        That’s not what I said, but I love how you misquoted me in the framework of your own personal warped version of reality.

        Read the subtext of the article. This location was obviously selected for a politically motivated reason, and I’d be interested to know what that was i.e. was it a general show of power (boring), or was it some hyper specific personal conflict with a prominent member of the club and a CCP party member (interesting).

        That doesn’t mean the intent behind the CCP policy isn’t good, well intentioned, or positive. But that’s not surprising to me, so it’s not very interesting. What drove the politics behind the decision to raze a Golf Course to spite HK elite, is very interesting, at least to me.

        • Not_mikey@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          the primary motivation behind this decision was. Obviously it wasn’t building public housing

          That doesn’t mean the intent behind the CCP policy isn’t good, well intentioned, or positive

          Can you see how I’m confused, do you think the primary intent is for public housing, or for some political drama?

          It could be some political drama, we’ll never know what goes on in the HK city council, but if you read the article you’ll see this site wasn’t selected so much as it’s lease was up and the city would be taking back control of it and they needed to do something with it. Yeah some high official could’ve been waiting for the course to come back into city hands so they could build public housing over it and snub a rival, but I think it’s far more likely that the property fell into the cities hands and they decided to turn it into affordable housing because that’s what the city needs, no sinister or alterior motive is needed.

    • jaybone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      11 months ago

      That’s exactly what this is, a CCP flex, and it’s quite sad (though not at all unexpected) to see half the people in this thread applauding it.

      • EatATaco@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        We don’t read the article, just the headline. And it allowed us to shit on rich people over a game that really doesn’t change much at all. That’s all we needed.

    • Shaggy1050@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      May I ask why? My old town had about a dozen golf courses when I was growing up. Now when I drive by it’s all housing developments other than the few that remain. It used to be a more rural area.

      I’d much rather see green space and golf courses than housing developments. While I completely agree that there is a housing shortage, it appears that root issue isn’t solved by more housing developments on golf courses. Instead, why not convert existing buildings (such as unused office spaces) into public housing. Or, prevent corporations or investment firms from buying up real estate/housing to turnaround and jack up costs.

      I may be biased but I’ve had these views before picking up golf. I mainly use golf as a way to stay active as I’m getting older and get outside in the fresh air.

  • Crow@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    11 months ago

    I wish golf wasn’t a sport of the elite. It’s such a fun. Whacking a ball as far as you can is so satisfying and then combo that with an all day walk through a garden. We must revive golf as the every man’s sport!

    • Cl1nk@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      11 months ago

      Never thought about golf like this, it always seems so boring and pretentious, hitting a little ball seems so technical

      • RedAggroBest@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        11 months ago

        Watch less pro golf. All the old farts out there suck ass and are largely just taking the chance to be out drinking with friends. Don’t need to be sober to drive a golf cart, at least here.

    • asteriskeverything@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 months ago

      I often see golf clubs at thrift stores and affordable courses do exist at least where I live. Maybe it’s just just perception thing!

      But yeah fuck golf courses regardless. There’s also indoor golf which isn’t a drain on the environment and taking up useless land and actually can be fun experience for anyone cuz it can be an inclusive experience for any skill or economic class, like bowling.

    • Changer098@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      There’s a somewhat rinky-dink course in my hometown that’s pretty cheap but still nice. It was pretty fun to go in the evening and walk nine holes where you get a good but easy exercise with some nature to it.

      Trying to find that same experience away from my hometown has been a challenge. The sport is too damn expensive!

      • bobs_monkey@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        I’ve got several municipal courses around where the green fee is $35, and a cart rental is $10. I got a random set of clubs from a buddy for $50, and you can get a decent box of balls from Costco for about $25. I think it’s definitely about where you’re at, but I enjoy spending an afternoon with buddies playing whackfuck (I’m absolutely terrible).

  • hungryphrog
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Hell yeah. Having a humongous area of grass that needs to be moved and watered reserved for a boring sport when there are tons of people paying ridiculously high rent to be able to cram themselves into some tiny closet. Fuck the CCP tho.

    • Quokka@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      A more telling sign would be if they did it on the mainland. They’re always happy to go against HK because they’re more likely to rebel and demand their rights back.

      Still broken clocks and all so good on them for this I guess.