The media won’t give me great answers to this question and I think this I trust this community more, thus I want to know from you. Also, I have heard reports that Russia was winning the war, if that’s true, did the west miscalculate the situation by allowing diplomacy to take a backseat and allowing Ukraine to a large plethora of military resources?

PS: I realize there are many casualties on both sides and I am not trying to downplay the suffering, but I am curious as to how it is going for Ukraine. Right now I am hearing ever louder calls of Russia winning, those have existed forever, but they seem to have grown louder now, so I was wondering what you thought about it. Also, I am somewhat concerned of allowing a dictatorship to just erase at it’s convenience a free and democratic country.

  • dudinax@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    The West would like Ukraine to win, but it’s more important to the West that the war drag on and be a drain on Russia’s resources.

    • Kissaki@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      No it’s not. The west has nothing to gain from it dragging on. Nobody wants it to drag on.

      • ours@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        It sucks for Ukraine but a Russia tied down in Ukraine has less funds to meddle with the rest of the World.

        It drains their military and their economy while Putin must be extra careful against coups. There has been one very famous coup attempt directly related to the war (Wagner Group) and who knows how many other smaller attempts have been stopped preemptively?

        • fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Very expensive way to drain Russia. Tbh following trends the best way to drain Russia was the status quo of letting Putin dictate it into obscurity through corruption.

          • ours@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            But during the status quo, Putin had his hands free to finance destabilizing extremists, Internet troll armies and wage cyberwarfare on the West.

            All while reflecting an image of strength.

      • dudinax@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        They have quite a lot to gain by it. Getting the other side stuck in a quagmire has been the preferred strategy for both sides in US vs. Russia for decades.

        • Kissaki@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          They would gain more by cooperation or ignoring.

          It’s just that you can’t do that when the other party is actively destructive.

          Doesn’t make it a gain in my eyes. Labeling it a gain at least requires a contextualized qualification. So saying the EU is interested in prolonging the conflict is very disingenuous.

          EU would have far more to gain ffrom Russia leaving Ukraine. Saying the EU wants to prolong the conflict for gains is disingenuous, at least misleading or ambiguous.

          • dudinax@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            What the West gains is a diminished Russia less inclined to adventure. That’s a big gain.

            The most important goal in this situation for the West is to avoid war with Russia. Since Russia has the resources to wage the war for a long time as long as the West doesn’t join it, then whether Ukraine wins is purely a Russian decision.