• clearedtoland@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    264
    ·
    1 year ago

    My god. This deliciously tasty excerpt:

    In various campaign biographies, a résumé and interviews, Mr. Santos said he graduated from Baruch College in New York City, where he was a volleyball star on a championship team. He boasted of working at Citigroup and Goldman Sachs and amassing personal wealth. He claimed to be descended from Holocaust refugees; that his mother was in the World Trade Center during the Sept. 11 attacks; and that he lost four employees in the Pulse nightclub shooting in Orlando.

    None of those claims were true.

    • MiscreantMouse@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      123
      ·
      1 year ago

      The real question is where tf were the journalists while Santos was running his campaign on these false claims?

      Too busy playing horse race? Frantically trying to find something newsworthy about Hunter Biden’s laptop? Credulously glorifying some billionaire’s childish misconceptions?

      Guess we’ll never know.

      • Snot Flickerman
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        72
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Well, he’s a representative for New York, in a district for New York City itself. Long Island and “technically” a tiny bit of NYC. (I have been informed that his district is mostly Long Island)

        Let’s break this down into two parts, okay?

        1. Local journalism is dead, dead, dead, dead dead. Especially in big places like New York City, where everyone assumes that the New York Times will be covering things. They didn’t dig deep into Mayor Adams either, and that guy is under investigation now as well. They didn’t question his former police credentials after decades of police misconduct. Beyond that the NYT is more of a national newspaper than an actual local paper. I’m sure there are plenty of small independent news sources in New York City, but I’m also sure they’re mostly drowned out and ignored compared to how many people read something like the NYT.

        2. Corruption in New York City is literally, completely nothing new. Journalists have been failing to uncover unscrupulous activity for decades in this city. As I referenced mayor Adams above, this city filled with the rich, egotistical, and greedy, is a city built on the kind of lies George Santos peddles. How do I know? Because that city allowed Donald Trump to be a successful real estate developer using similar tactics. People have known he’s corrupt since forever, but plenty of his corruption was just ignored until decades later. Same with Rudy Guiliani and so on.

        Now I’m not saying we should just give up. Local journalism is important to fight for, and NYC being a corrupt hell-hole isn’t a permanent foregone conclusion. However, my point is that NYT employs far fewer reporters than you think to cover an entire country, and the dearth of real local news sources all over the country is contributing to these kind of people succeeding, because the local press is dead in the water and can’t afford to send someone researching local corruption.

        Pay for your local news, is what I am saying, I guess, and things might marginally improve.

          • Snot Flickerman
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I mean, it was always a lifestyle brand. Even back in the day you’d open the “Lifestyle” section of the paper, and it would be about how to afford that third house in the Hamptons. It’s always been clear who their market is aimed at.

        • EatYouWell@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah, actual journalism is dead, especially since investigating stuff like this might get you raided by SWAT

        • merc@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          the NYT is more of a national newspaper than an actual local paper

          These days, the NYT likes to think of itself as a tech company that also does some journalism. They’ve bought games like Wordle, they’re a podcasting company, they publish books…

          • Pips@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            1 year ago

            Games and alternative media formats for journalists have always been a part of journalism. I’m not sure how embracing modern technology makes them any less of a news organization. Would you prefer only the crossword and only in print?

            A newspaper having a word game, a radio presence, and publishing books is not really a gotcha.

        • deweydecibel@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Worth pointing out part of the reason local journalism died is because it’s not financially viable.

          Because interest in local politics died.

          If people have a shit, journalist could make a living.

        • hemmes@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          In NYC construction, it’s well known that Trump businesses would get bids contracted, then call a meeting before kickoff and demand that the primes and subs lower there price or they won’t honor the contract. Some contractors would already have materials purchased and running the clock on the Net30s with their vendors. Trump Co. would basically tell them to go pound salt and try to sue if you want.

        • Asafum@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          He was a representative of long island not NYC, specifically the district my dad resides in so I get to poke fun at him for electing this absolute joke of an asshat lol

          Checking the map it looks like part of it might be in queens so “technically” some part of it is NYC, but it’s mostly rich long island assholes. (I wish my dad was rich, he’s just lucky to have had a house in that area for a long time) lol

          • Snot Flickerman
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            You can tell I’m not from the area, because divisions like that are lost on me. I just know local news is hollowed out nationwide, and I somehow suspect it’s a similar situation for New York state as a whole. Thanks for the more detailed breakdown of his district for me.

            • Asafum@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              Absolutely, local news would more than likely be “responsible” for covering him and they tend to favor the right, but not excessively thankfully.

        • MiscreantMouse@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Ah yes, clearly we should simply accept that corruption is endemic, unavoidable really, and expect our press to ignore it.

          Tale as old as time, I’m sure it’ll work out fine.

          They have more important things to focus on anyway! Like Hunter Biden’s laptop.

          And of course, Journalism’s collapsing payment model is entirely the public’s fault. Just give them more money you lazy bums!

          • Snot Flickerman
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            15
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Now I’m not saying we should just give up. Local journalism is important to fight for, and NYC being a corrupt hell-hole isn’t a permanent foregone conclusion.

            Nice complete misrepresentation of what I said, chucklefuck.

            EDIT: Also came back because like, you’re going to bitch about journalists not doing their job and then turn around and say its not our job to fund them. Pick a fucking lane. Do you care about journalism or not?

            • MiscreantMouse@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Oh I’m sorry, after re-reading it looks like you actually said we should fight for better journalism by skipping breakfast, or selling our plasma, and giving the money we save to the conglomerates providing our local news. Totally makes sense.

              • Snot Flickerman
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                10
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                If you think journalists aren’t living the same way, you’re out of your mind. They need to be able to take care of themselves, too, to do their jobs.

                But cool, I guess the answer is fuck all journalism then, because you can’t be fucked to care about how it’s funded. You’re expecting it to just be handed to you by people who do it for the love of it, and then wonder why that doesn’t happen, when you yourself understand exactly why it can’t and you just explained it.

                What a fucking shitty crank. You don’t get what you want, so you want to tear down the whole thing, which is conveniently what you’ve accused me of. Do you do a lot of projection like this?

                I don’t exactly see you considering solutions, just a lot of bitching.

                • MiscreantMouse@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Because you’re obviously struggling, what I’m saying that objective & effective journalism is vital to informed decision-making in a democracy, and we’re not getting it because journalism in the US is run as a business¸ which imo will always end with media focusing exclusively on whatever makes them the most money, irrespective of the truth. If we want real journalism we need to view it, and fund it, as a public service. The problem is systemic, and our news media will continue to fail us until the system is rectified.

                  • Snot Flickerman
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    6
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    I don’t disagree, but you’re skipping a lot of steps of how we fucking get there, man. You’re not going to start the revolution tomorrow by being an asshole on the internet. You’ll just get a lot of people quoting Lebowski at you: “You’re not wrong, Walter, you’re just an asshole.”

                    Sorry I’m busy living in the world as it currently exists instead of expending all my energy on lofty ideas that sadly most Americans are too toothlessly uneducated in understanding, yet supporting. I’d rather work on building coalitions, talking about how we can change things, and working within the system as it exists at the moment because we don’t have a lot of other choices.

                    But sure, be angry that you can’t magically snap your fingers to make it better overnight, that really helps us get there. It’s throwing the baby out with the bathwater type stupidity.

                    It’s not like non-profit journalistic outfits don’t exist, but they need funding. NPR used to be Publicly funded, but last I checked, the public funding dried the fuck up, because people don’t call to pledge money in telethons anymore, and surprise, now they’re corporate funded instead.

                    Where do you think the money comes from to fund public news? It comes from the public, either in donations, or in the case of something like the BBC, taxes and fees like a TV license. Either way, you’d be “selling plasma” to afford it. You don’t suddenly get to opt out of funding it because you’re too poor when its taxes.

      • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        ·
        1 year ago

        Why are you blaming journalists and not the GOP for not vetting their own fucking candidate.

      • krashmo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        1 year ago

        I remember seeing articles about this stuff during his election. Republicans elected him anyway. That’s where we are now

      • merc@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        1 year ago

        where tf were the journalists while Santos was running his campaign on these false claims?

        There aren’t enough journalists to go around. There are hundreds of congresspeople and there definitely aren’t hundreds of journalists covering random unimportant congresspeople.

        People have voted with their dollars, saying they don’t care enough about vetting congresspeople before they’re elected to actually pay the salaries of journalists to do that.

        • MiscreantMouse@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Wow, so It’s almost as if expecting unregulated capitalism to solve this problem is not working? How could that be?

          Oh well, I guess we just need to ignore the problem until it gets better.

      • KnowledgeableNip@leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Journalism as it used to exist has been absolutely gutted. There’s no time for investigation, we need endless content pumped out at faster and faster rates. Who cares what’s accurate as long as people click the link and give up that sweet, sweet ad revenue?