• MasterNerd@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    211
    ·
    1 year ago

    Kinda weird that they’re calling it an OS, but ig they’re just trying to cater to the windows audience

      • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Neon is more of a testbed than a proper distro (they don’t actually even use that word).

        Is this “the KDE distro”?

        Nope. KDE believes it is important to work with many distributions, as each brings unique value and expertise for their respective users. This is one project out of hundreds from KDE.

      • rwhitisissle@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Which is…still not an OS. It’s a distribution. Specifically, it’s a fork of Ubuntu. To reiterate what the OP was saying, they’re catering to the Windows audience, who understand the concept of a “new Windows version,” but who wouldn’t understand the concept of a distribution.

        • killerinstinct101@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          What exactly is an OS to you? All distros are operating systems because they ship all the tools and utilities need for the system to function (on top of a package manager).

          The fact that the KDE devs didn’t write that code themselves doesn’t disqualify it from being an OS.

          • rwhitisissle@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            An OS is the interface layer between hardware and software. It’s the first code that runs after the boot loader, and it exposes an API for syscalls that allow user processes to allocate typically restricted resources, while also tracking and maintaining those allocated resources, doing process scheduling, and a bunch of other critical tasks.

            All distros are operating systems because they ship all the tools and utilities need for the system to function

            All distros contain operating systems (or, more accurately, kernels), or, rather, are built on top of them. A distribution is a collection of curated software, along with an init system and, for linux, package manager, and, frequently, a particular desktop environment. These pieces of software are, on some level, superfluous. You can have an OS without them. They don’t comprise the OS as a distinct conceptual layer of a computer system, of which there is the hardware, operating system, application, and user layers. The operating system is just Linux - because that is the interface layer between the hardware and software.

            Saying “all distros are operating systems” is like saying “all cars are engines.” It’s just wrong. And I don’t care what wikipedia has to say about it.

        • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s actually not even a distro, according to their own description at least

          Is it a distro?

          Not quite, it’s a package archive with the latest KDE software on top of a stable base. While we have installable images, unlike full Linux distributions we’re only interested in KDE software.

            • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              They probably feel like the name distribution means more than just slapping a DE on it and basically a PPA. Then again, haven’t stopped loads of distros from doing that hah.

              Could be another way to discourage people using it as a beginner distro or something.

              • rwhitisissle@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                I mean, there’s over a thousand linux distributions already and it feels like they just don’t want it to be another drop of water in the ocean.

  • GustavoM@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    186
    ·
    1 year ago

    “But can Linux install things via a single .exe file? HAHAH EAT IT NERD!”

    - 10’ish years ago past me, before discovering the magical wonders of the package manager

    • RQG@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      67
      ·
      1 year ago

      I found since people are used to app stores, I’ve had a much easier time convincing people to try out Linux. My mom even said that she always wished her windows PC had a proper app store.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        48
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I think it’s still important to explain the key difference between an “app store” and a package repository: the latter isn’t a “store” because everything is free.

        • FangedWyvern42@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s not that good. It’s ok (especially now that it’s been unshackled from the hell of UWP), but it’s not as good as most Linux options.

          • Tavarin@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            For someone like OPs mom it would be more than good enough is my point. She’s saying she wished something existed that does indeed exist.

          • Tavarin@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Of course, and much of it is on the app store now (which I rarely use myself), but for someone like OPs mom who just wants an easy app store, well there is one.

      • Kierunkowy74@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        33
        ·
        1 year ago

        What chmod step?

        When I clicked on new app image, the OS told me, that program /name of app/ will be launched, I clicked “Continue” and it runs! No meddling with “chmod” or anything like that.

        • Damage@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          ELF and .sh files need to be set executable, chmod +x file, before they can be run, unless your DE does that for you

          Dunno about appimages

          • droans@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            At least for Ubuntu, you do need to set the permissions of the AppImage before it’ll launch.

            I still haven’t figured out how to make .desktop files work yet.

      • theshatterstone54@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        With file managers, for example in thunar, you can select Properties -> Permissions -> Allow this file to run as a program

        • cerement@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          also for non-KDE, non-Gnome systems, there’s appimaged – requires a little more setup, but handles the set executable, automates the AppImage integration (.desktop files and menus), keeps a watch on specific folders for new AppImages, and provides a way to check for updates

          • theshatterstone54@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’m saving this. I don’t use any appimages (except a cracked Minecraft bedrock launcher but we dont talk about that one), but I’m still going to save this.

      • Ziixe@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        I installed Linux a few weeks ago and it was on Tuesday I wanted to add some programs I had installed (it was mGBA and melonDS) to my steam launcher, I went through the hassle of making a . desktop file for both of them (I was dumb and used a Ubuntu based distro, so it installed as a snap, which sucks hard on a hdd) and then it wouldn’t launch, I searched up again (I was using chatGPT for all of this, I asked it a lot how to do stuff, it’s like this was it’s purpose beacuse it always worked first try), did the chmod x+ command and then I was done

        Just to see it not launch :/

      • bellsDoSing@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Honestly, if all you’ve ever experienced in regards to terminals is windows CMD, then you really haven’t seen much. I mean that possitively. Actually, it will give you a far worse impression on what using a Linux / Unix terminal can be like (speaking as someone who spent what feel’s like years in terminals, of which the least amount in windows CMD).

        I suggest to simply play around with a Linux terminal (e.g. install VirtualBox,.then use it to install e.g. Ubuntu, then follow some simple random “Linux terminal beginner tutorial” you can find online).

        • Kühe sind toll@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          The Windows Terminal is absolute Garbage. I tried to use it for some very simple stuff and it was such a trash experience. It just feels wrong.

      • psud@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Don’t worry about the terminal until or unless you have something to do that needs it, then follow a guide

        Incidentally if a guide tells you to run a program in terminal, you can check what that program is supposed to do

        • man command (eg. man mount) gives you the manual, if it has a manual
        • command -h or --help gives you the command’s help page - pipe it through “less” if it’s more than a single screen eg: ls -h | less
  • glibg10b@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    146
    ·
    1 year ago

    Windows 11 takes your money, gives you ads, sells your information and ignores your bug reports and feature requests

    KDE is free, ad-free and open to contribution

    I think we have a clear winner here

    • desconectado@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      But can it run proprietary software used in the industry? From Excel to Photoshop, if you are in a collaborative professional environment, you can’t run away from those, and don’t tell me you can use the alternatives in Linux, because no, you can’t. This is not linux fault, but it’s still an issue you can’t handwave.

      I love linux, but you can’t expect people to adopt it just because it’s objectively better than windows.

      • FangedWyvern42@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        1 year ago

        Wine can run most of those, not all. You can still dual boot Windows if you need to (VMs are an option, but they aren’t always the best).

        • desconectado@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          1 year ago

          I mean, that’s what I do. Will I be able to convince my 60 yo colleague that had been using the same workflow for decades? No, not a chance.

          • d3Xt3r@lemmy.nzM
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Are you talking about for work or home usage? And do they have any specific proprietary application/hardware requirements?

            • desconectado@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Work use. The are hardware requirements (XRD machines, potentiostats, CNC machining) and software requirements (3D design). My workshop asks for files in Autodesk Inventor, if I send it in any other format, they just won’t fabricate my pieces, and I completely understand, who am I to change the workflow of a complete department just because I refuse to use Inventor (which is provided at work).

        • gmtom@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          But you understand that’s a massive Ballache to deal with on top of your normal workload?

          • psud@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I haven’t tried running anything new, but the stuff I have run in wine has worked easily, without any tweaking

      • Holzkohlen@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 year ago

        You just gotta make an effort. The one who are too lazy will never be free of Microsoft’s clutches. Which probably just means pretty much everyone will stick to windows.

        • desconectado@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s my point, I use linux as much as I can, but if 80% of your colleagues use Windows… You don’t have much choice.

            • desconectado@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I use linux 50% of my time, I’m not going to ditch my job so I can use it 100%, lol. What kind of advice is that for someone who wants to use linux.

          • psud@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            It depends on your industry. I’m in an agile development team, working in AWS in Java. I’m not a dev, so my work is in spreadsheets, word processor documents, web utilities like Azure Dev Ops

            All that is platform independent, though we have to work on the organisation’s computers, so we work in the office on windows PCs or from home on whatever, remoted into a windows machine or VM

            The devs work in VMs which are variously windows or GNU/Linux depending on what the person’s previous project was.

      • Audrey Zane@mastodon.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        @desconectado @glibg10b Wine exists… And that’s all I have to say. There is a good installer in lutris for creative cloud that works pretty good if you own it. And if you have a NVIDIA graphics card, it works even better, almost like on windows. It’s not 1:1 but we’re getting close. For excel you have wine again or a great free alternative is WPS or softmaker if you want to buy it.

        • desconectado@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I wish Wine worked well enough to use Excel. We are not talking about adding up numbers in a cell. Once you include macros, or a reference manager in Word, Wine is not good enough. The same can be said about propietary software, like autocad, or software used to control equipment. Also, good luck convincing a regular user to get familiar with wine.

          WPS is great for simple files. Again, not good enough for complex files, especially if it is a corporate collaboration environment. I have lost count on the amount of ppt files that didn’t display well when it used WPS.

          Every other year I try all the alternatives you mention, hoping they got better, and I always come back to use a dual boot or a virtual machine, which is not a thing your regular user wants to do.

      • aldalire@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        List of things to consider

        1. There are alternatives
        2. You can use wine
        3. You can run a windows VM and install it there
        4. Dual boot windows
        5. Microsoft has built a proprietary moat around their operating system. The reason why it’s hard to switch from Windows is by corporate design. A mix of early adoption, network effects, and just plain cold hard cash makes them dominate the operating system market. Of course it’s infeasible for your 60yo coworker to switch; but KDE presents an alternate reality, an opportunity, for people fed up with big tech’s bullshit. Yes, figure out how to run and use alternatives you fucking nut. Way to go disparaging countless volunteer hours spent on open source projects so that people like me can switch to linux.

        Comments like these make me irrationally angry. Why complain about open source software and give bad PR? It’s open source; contribute.

        • desconectado@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Read my other replies. 1 and 2 don’t really work, the performance of using wine, or the alternatives, is just not there, if you do amateur work, maybe that’s fine, but for professional collaborative work, good luck using freecad instead of autocad.

          Personally, I use 3 and 4, but you have to understand that the regular user is not going to go through that much hassle to set up a virtual machine.

      • Opafi@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        There are enough web based office instances running for Linux to be functional in that regard.

        Photoshop on the other hand…

        • psud@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          GIMP will be great once it no longer needs to dodge patents

          Audio players work great now MP3 is out of patent (before that MP3 was really only available if you were willing to ignore the patent)

      • cannache@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Meh I had a dual boot machine ages ago. Still here collecting dust. Basically I only switched to use the Linux for down time, movies, and study, most day to day tasks from engineering software to anything I considered important enough that you do not want the results hacked or broken I would use Windows.

        I think of modern machines kind of like a hammer. These days almost nobody actually remembers the guy who made the first hammer, or who discovered fire, but there’s a price tag for the bow, the paper and the hammer, not so much the making of the hammer, because the actual skill involved or required to learn about it has become challenged if not cheapened to the degree that there are now multiple paths to obtain or create a hammer, yet the benchmark quality of the hammer as well as the process for creation itself as a whole is now more of an authority than the actual original statue or monolith of “hammer man” himself.

        This is why I think the many flavours of Ubuntu including the many esoteric Linux distros are still interesting but still lack the diversity of use and specialization. The fact that whole blockchains are built for XYZ while sitting around pumped then dumped to trading at cents with no use goes to show how cloud computing systems and lower level computing is still very disconnected and becoming further thrown aside to uphold ponzi schemes.

        I’ll give you an example, more money is wasted on onlyfans per year than for people trying to use system XYZ for solving problem A, or curing cancer. Consider that to be one of the “good” reasons many men and women are so misogynistic, even without looking down on sex workers.

      • dino@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I love linux, but you can’t expect people to adopt it just because it’s objectively better than windows.

        Excel o,O

    • CaptnNMorgan@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      But can it play Starfield with an Nvidia GPU? I originally had popos on my PC until Starfield came out, I had to switch to Windows to play.

  • Franzia
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    100
    ·
    1 year ago

    Linux is the modern OS and windows is just a bunch of old shitty technology in a trench suit.

    • mrcleanup@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, but that old technology is what still lets me run a 13 year old version of Adobe creative suite. If that ever changes I will have to learn something new!

      • Franzia
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        We will perhaps never beat adobe but nowadays there are some amazing tools!

        … Which are developed for windows as well. Haha.

  • HouseWolf@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    73
    ·
    1 year ago

    So basically ever since I first tried Windows 7 I held it as the “Gold standard” for desktop OS’s. Half my tweaks to Windows 10 were trying to get it as close to Win7 as I possibly could.

    When I finally start experimenting with Linux early this year KDE quickly got me to reconsider my “Gold standard” and finally switch my main machine fully to Linux.

    No regrets and certainly ain’t switching back even if Microsoft gave me updated Windows 7 with every extra feature I wanted back then.

    • Patch@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      49
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I’ve been a Linux user for a decade and a half now, but still use Windows on my corporate laptops. Honestly, it’s baffling how Microsoft seem to consistently manage to miss the mark with the UI design. There’s lots to be said about the underlying internals of Windows vs Linux, performance, kernel design etc., but even at the shallow, end user, “is this thing pleasant to use” stakes, they just never manage to get it right.

      Windows 7 was…fine. It was largely inoffensive from a shell point of view, although things about how config and settings were handled were still pretty screwy. But Windows 8 was an absolutely insane approach to UI design, Windows 10 spent an awful lot of energy just trying to de-awful it without throwing the whole thing out, and Windows 11 is missing basic UI features that even Windows 7 had.

      When you look at their main commercial competition (Mac and Chromebook) or the big names in Linux (GNOME, KDE, plenty of others besides), they stand out as a company that simply can’t get it right, despite having more resources to throw at it than the rest of them put together.

      • SkyeStarfall
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        1 year ago

        To me it’s absurd how Microsoft gets beaten by a free desktop environment when windows is like their main product. They have billions of dollars. How do they manage to not do better?

        • cygnus@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          1 year ago

          windows is like their main product

          TBF it isn’t really - only about 12% of their revenue. It’s more of a means to lock people into their other products.

          • SkyeStarfall
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Well, that’s the thing, it’s the core part of their entire business. The glue that sticks everything together. Or at least used to be until Azure.

      • Damage@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        What drives me crazy is how they can’t update all their configuration interface to the same standard, if you go deep enough you still fine things that are unchanged since Windows 98

          • cerement@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            that the modern Settings still falls back on Control Panel most of the time

            I can understand wanting to replace Control Panel but all they ended up doing was creating a Windows Shell frontend

      • andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        It seems like a big company’s problem. They have a well-paid design\marketing department that can do whatever they want to create the best-selling interface for the new version of Windows, but before it’s released, no one tested it yet for anything but bugs, and who’d argue with a flock of top designers anyway? Add here the board of directors who are here to sell them ideas and who won’t use it either – I’m sure they applauded to the idea of unifying mobile and desktop experience with WinPhone&Win8, but especially Tablet-Laptop transformers they saw as the future. It sounds great on the paper, right? At that time it could’ve even sounded obvious for their business. And so it happened like it did.

        Linux counters it by constant feedback and competition between easily switchable DEs, users being prepared even to jump distros; Apple has a fetish for style and experience (that’s a half of their pricetag), they build their business model about looking and feel nice, so you’d build an ecosystem of their products, you can’t even see error windows here and their garden is gated af; and ChromeOS\Android aren’t shy of looking what others do (like iPhone’s design findings) and conservatively taking what works, also having tons of vendor-created restyles\forks on their own platform as a testing ground for new ideas to make them then a standard. MS lack all of it, and their creative process is guided by external interests and ideals, it’s just an afterthought. And as they have their stable market share, they probably won’t even care. It took whole internet’s screams to return their traditional start menu in win8.1, then w10.

        That’d probably stay the same until their new CEO would happen to be an art college graduate - like the current one pushed for accessebility and building special controllers because she has a child with a disability. A top-down signal. I won’t bet on it anytime soon.

      • TheHarpyEagle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        The fact that Windows 11 has removed the ability to move the taskbar and has no intention of adding it back is just baffling to me. It’s a small thing but so jarring every time I try to use it that I’ve barely used my desktop in the last few months.

    • 7u5k3n@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve been on Linux for ages and ages… back when I had to order CDs for new copies of Ubuntu.

      Kde is the first desktop experience that I feel is the gold standard.

      Every iteration of Linux I’ve used, solus, fedora, Ubuntu, Manjaro the DE I use is KDE.

      I’m not sure why… but it makes sense to me and is my gold standard experience.

      • legios@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Haha, I remember buying Mandrake Linux CDs… I’m a FreeBSD user these days (for the past 20-odd years) but still run KDE. Plus they’re still trying to remain fairly *nix agnostic which is nice.

    • jeremyparker@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      I hate to say this, because I know how cringe it is, but… Windows 7 actually removed a lot of features that made Windows fun. And yeah, I’m talking about ricing and I’m unironically saying ricing is valid.

      The mid 2000s was an awesome time to be in the ricing community - between litestep, blackbox, foobar2k, rainlendar/rainmeter etc, you could actually make your experience look however you wanted.

      And, litestep in particular, for me, was a gateway drug to openbox and therefore Linux - when you finally hit The Windows Wall, where, to go any further, you had to step into Linux, Ubuntu was there, and then Mint, and then…idr what.

      I still have my 2007 Ubuntu installation cd that they mailed to me for free. Sure, you could just make your own installation cd rom, but, if you couldn’t, they would happily mail you one - or, as in my case, you felt motivated to evangelize, they’d send you a bunch that you could give out to people. I gave mine to friends and left some others at the local anarchist bookstore (I don’t remember the name of it but this was Washington DC just north of Chinatown).

      Windows 7 was a big step backwards. You could still do a lot of ricing, but less - and it was very clear from the direction that Windows 7 went, that whatever came next would be worse.

      • legios@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Oh shit, I remember LiteStep and spending hours and hours to just fiddle with how my desktop looked. I personally felt Windows 2000 was the pinnacle of MS OSs (except so many games etc. wouldn’t run because rightly the OS reported it was Windows NT and a lot of games shat themselves at that)

        • glibg10b@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah, ricing is slang for the r/unixporn kind of themeing. It comes from car culture, where RICE stands for “race-inspired cosmetic enhancement”

        • Damage@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Ricing is usually used for extreme, often gaudy theming and personalization, with emphasis on looks rather than real usability

          • jeremyparker@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Idk if I would say it’s looks > usability, and it’s certainly not gaudy… There are theming styles that are much more unusable and gaudy than the “riced” look.

            It’s an aesthetic that idealizes a kind of barebones utility, and while it often will lean towards the look over the usability, the look itself is like a “beautiful utilitarian” - minimalistic, uncluttered, etc.

  • Synthead@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    1 year ago

    To be fair, forcing a bunch of software on the machine users own was never a good move, and in my opinion, not a new normal.

  • Max_Power@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Yeah like they (the Windows sheeple) celebrated a CLI package manager as if it was their best invention since sliced bread. Every Linux user was like yaaawwwn… “finally”

    • MudMan@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      47
      ·
      1 year ago

      Who in the world celebrated that?

      Like, I get the self-reinforcing bubble that Linux communities exist in and all, but… nobody did that.

      The vast majority of Windows users are random people that never touch anything beyond the Start menu in their entire computing lives. What segment of the Windows userbase is out there celebrating any features, let alone command line anything? This is not a thing. At least not in numbers large enough to matter.

      Sorry, I try not to get involved in these arguments. Frankly, grown adults taking sides on operating systems of all things like it’s Sega vs Nintendo in a 90s playground seems very strange but I don’t begrudge people finding communities wherever. It’s just… you know, come on.

      • smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        1 year ago

        As someone who needs to do initial installs on computers with 10-20, I celebrated. It is much easier to type names of the programs and the manager do anything instead of manually downloading installers. But turned out WinGet is really badly done.

        As for preferences, for some this is actually Nintendo vs Sega unfortunetly. But don’t underestimate moral decitions too.

      • BolexForSoup@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        People who do not use the dominant system/program/etc. often feel the need to tear down everyone else in order to validate their decision instead of just letting the results and their daily happiness with the decision speak for itself.

        • TimeSquirrel@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          1 year ago

          This is me, just getting shit done. If you are constantly thinking about what OS you’re using, you’re doing it wrong.

          • BolexForSoup@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            Because I am too lazy to make an actual thread on mastodon I’m going to corner you and ask you a quick question if you don’t mind! Feel free to ignore haha.

            I’ve recently dipped my toes in Linux and it’s been really fun learning about all of it, but I still haven’t really settled on an OS. Rather than trying to reinvent the wheel or trying to predict everything, I decided to use what I have right in front of me: my steamdeck! I figured playing around on SteamOS in desktop mode is a great way to acclimate myself to Linux a little bit and figure out what I really like and such.

            What are some essential programs and QOL things you would recommend? I am interested in trying to host my Plex server off of it, maybe even fiddle around with video editing since that’s what I do professionally (resolve runs on Linux so not worried there), maybe some audio tools. I just want to kind of see what it would look like as a daily driver, though I am very aware that Steam OS has limitations as one.

            I’m coming from Mac and I am pretty comfortable doing terminal commands, troubleshooting tech issues, and I’m pretty privacy concerned. Hence why I’m trying to migrate a little bit away for macOS potentially haha. Any and all suggestions are welcome! Even just good website or resources for learning more would be very welcome.

        • Nate Cox@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          You don’t even need to quality it. Some people just feel the need to tear down others to make themselves feel good. It’s low self-esteem, misplaced onto whatever happens to be near them.

          I think we’re all vulnerable to it, too. Part of being a good neighbor is checking yourself to see if you’re being a dick about your preferences, and just letting people enjoy what they enjoy (unless that thing is harming others; you know, common sense).

          • BolexForSoup@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Oh yeah, let me be clear: I’m sure I engage in it myself. I like to think though that I’ve mostly gotten away from it, as I did plenty of that snobbery when I was younger with music and by the time I got to college realized that was just a really tool-ish way of acting that kept people away from what I thought was awesome art

      • russjr08@outpost.zeuslink.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Sysadmins very commonly make a lot of use out of automating things with Powershell and various utilities that work with it.

        Given that a pretty decent sized portion (I’d assume at least, no numbers to back that up sadly) of the Linux user base tends to be “cut from the same cloth” in terms of having the passion to automate (and heavily customize) their system - I would think this is why you see this sentiment repeated often.

  • floofloof@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    1 year ago

    I came back to KDE after a long absence because I never liked it back in the day (I found it ugly and bloated). I was really surprised by how good it has become. It’s now my favourite desktop environment on Linux, and I’m looking forward to version 6. So to any other oldies still avoiding KDE because of how it used to be, it’s worth another look.

    • k_rol@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I second your experience. It was not so impressive back then and 2indo2s was much nicer, but not anymore. I’m feeling it, this year Linux will be on top!

      Edit: I tried to write Windows 🤷‍♂️

      • littlewonder@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Here I am thinking there’s some obscure Linux project using a name that’s somehow a sequel to Windows, like a Windows 2, but also a play on the 2__4me meme.

    • TheHarpyEagle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Oh, this is good news for me. I remember trying KDE years ago and feeling that it was just way too heavy. My goto is usually Cinnamon, but the lack of Wayland support has made me hesitant to go all in with out on my gaming PC. Def gonna give KDE a try, thanks!

      • floofloof@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Cinnamon was where I had ended up too. So now I have a couple of Linux Mint/Cinnamon machines and a Tumbleweed/KDE machine. It surprised me that I like KDE more.