The Israel Defense Forces releases surveillance camera footage from Shifa Hospital showing Hamas terrorists bringing a Nepali and Thai citizen who were abducted from Israel on October 7 to the medical center.

  • kescusay@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    1 year ago

    This will hopefully put to rest any notion that Hamas hasn’t been using civilian infrastructure as shields.

    • jonne@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Isn’t this just bringing in wounded hostages for treatment? What do you expect hostage takers to do with wounded hostages exactly?

      • kescusay@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        No, it fucking isn’t. They weren’t there for treatment.

        What I expect from hostage takers is brutality, murder, and the intentional targeting of civilians, which is what they did. If Hamas wants to be taken seriously as a government, and not what they are - a terrorist organization that is as bad, if not worse, for Palestinians as the oppression from Israel - then I expect something else: NOT TAKING HOSTAGES.

          • kescusay@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            1 year ago

            POWs are SOLDIERS. Jesus fucking Christ, how the hell do you sleep at night? These hostages? They’re civilians. They’re you. They’re me. They’re just people, and Hamas stole them out of their country and is forcing them to stay with them.

            Defending that is sick.

            Israel is not the good guys here, either. The oppression they’ve inflicted on Gaza is terrible. But that can be true at the same time as it’s true that abducting civilians - after murdering a whole bunch of them - is also terrible.

              • kescusay@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                1 year ago

                You do know that means half of them aren’t, right?

                Jesus Christ, stop with the apologetics for kidnapping and murdering civilians! You can criticize Israel’s response without trying to make what Hamas did - and is still doing - acceptable.

        • jonne@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          1 year ago

          Lol, nobody’s saying they’re a proper government. Everyone agrees they’re terrorists. All I’m saying is that a hospital treating hostages doesn’t make it part of a terrorist entreprise.

          • kescusay@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            1 year ago

            They weren’t there for treatment. They were there for the tunnels, into which they forcibly dragged those hostages. Who are dead now.

            • jonne@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              16
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              From the article:

              One of the hostages is visibly wounded in his arm and is brought on a hospital bed, while the second is forcefully dragged into the hospital

              And

              In an evening press conference, IDF Spokesman Rear Adm. Daniel Hagari says the two wounded hostages were later taken by Hamas to hideouts, and that the Red Cross was unable to visit them. He says their locations are currently unknown.

              So, you’re wrong about both assertions. The IDF themselves say they were both wounded, and that after treatment they were moved to a different location. The source also doesn’t indicate they’re both dead now, you’re just making shit up.

              • kescusay@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                OK, I’ll take my lumps. You’re right, I missed that when I skimmed the article. I was wrong.

                That said, this is still a situation in which Hamas injured two civilians, abducted them, forcibly dragged one of them into a hospital that is now clearly known to have been at least partially a Hamas front, and is still holding them against their will (assuming they are still alive). The fact that they aren’t known to have committed the final atrocity - yet - to these two hostages does not magically make them the good guys in this.

                • ApexHunter@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  10
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Hamas are not the good guys. That doesn’t make the hospital the bad guys, and it doesn’t make everyone in Gaza complicit. Your inability to separate different actors in this scenario is limiting your perspective and objectivity.

                • jonne@infosec.pub
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  9
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Nobody’s calling Hamas the good guys. We’re pushing back on the narrative that the hospital itself is somehow involved and thus exempt from the normal protections in war.

                  Hospitals will treat anyone that comes in by default, and in the case of a Gazan hospital, what choice would they even have anyway? You can’t call the authorities if Hamas are the (de facto) authorities. You treat the hostage and get them to GTFO as fast as possible before you get bombed.

                  You are falling for the IDF narrative that says all Palestinians are Hamas, as if they have any kind of choice in the matter.

                • Aceticon@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  I some mob enforcer shot some guy “to teach him a lesson” and then brough him to a Hospital so that he wouldn’t die, would that make the Hospital a “Mob HQ” and justify a military attack on it that killed innocents being treated and working there?!

                  There is no such thing as Guilt By Association except in the “they’re all the same” of racist-logic, so one wonders how exactly anybody who is not a racist could ever go from “IDF video of Hamas bringing hostages for treatment in a Hospital” to “This justifies the IDF’s military attack on that hospital and associated civilian deaths”.

                  • kescusay@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    Oh, for fuck’s sake… Stop reading stuff into my comments that isn’t there. I didn’t justify Israel’s attack on the hospital. I said it’s known that the hospital is at least partially a front for Hamas, which should surprise zero people, since Hamas is a terrorist organization that uses civilian Palestinians as human shields.

                    The whole situation is fucked up because there are no right answers when an organization is willing to do that. It’s an effective - if psychotic - tactic, since only other psychotics would attack a building that is, yes, also a functional hospital.

                    And the accusation of racism - for pointing out that nothing Hamas does with hostages other than letting them go (or better yet, never injuring and taking them hostage in the first place) is good, and that we don’t know if the hostages in the video are even still alive, let alone actually treated there - is ridiculous.

                    Hamas is not Palestine, and Palestine is not Hamas. Palestinians are victimized by Hamas as much, if not more, than the Israeli civilians they murdered, because Palestinians have lived under their brutal rules for decades, and speaking out has long been a great way to get murdered along with one’s entire family.

                    I’m not taking Israel’s side, here. Yes, they were attacked first, and horrifically. But their response has also been horrific, and their oppression of Gaza has given Hamas oxygen it wouldn’t otherwise have had in the first place.

                    There are no easy answers now. Anyone who tells you they know who the good guys and bad guys are and how to solve this is a lying scumbag. And it doesn’t help when we don’t look honestly at Hamas and recognize its terrorist tactics for what they are.

    • Eldritch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      No one has been making that claim. So the only person who could lay it to rest is you. Since you’re the one claiming that. Everyone knows Hamas has been using civilian shields. We’re just upset about Israel committing genocide and using that as an excuse.

      • paintbucketholder@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Isn’t it weird how nobody ever says that Hamas is committing genocide when they don’t give a fuck about where their rockets explode in Gaza, when they’re murdering Palestinians who are trying to evacuate, when they’re using Palestinian civilians as human shields, when they’re firing rockets from civilian Palestinian infrastructure, deliberately making it a military target?

        Does it just not count when Hamas murders Palestinians, or how does that work?

        • Eldritch@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          Genocide is a focused/targeted slaying of specific groups. Hamas is murderous careless and wanton. It’s not genocide. It’s not good. But it’s not genocide. Israel however, is largely targeting and slaughtering large portions of innocent Palestinians who’ve done nothing to them. Simply because Israel wants the land and wants to clear the people. Who’ve lived there off of it. And are simply using the terrorist attack as an excuse That’s genocide.

          I mean everyone hates Mondays. Let’s be real here. But Monday isn’t a terrorist neither is Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, Friday, Sunday or Saturday.

        • ApexHunter@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Two wrongs don’t make a right. Criticizing Israeli actions is not implicit approval of Hamas actions.

          The challenge here is that Hamas are generally considered to be the bad guys. You expect the bad guys to do evil shit.

          Israel is supposed to be the good guys in this scenario. Being the good guys means you are not expected to do evil shit, and are supposed to do the right thing even if it is harder. Except right now they are doing orders more magnitude evil shit than the bad guys. I don’t think it is unfair to call them out on that.

          • Aceticon@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            They’re an Appartheid state (with explicit legislation that creates special citizenship classes by religion, with the Jewish Iraeli Citizenship having more rights than the Arab Israeli Citizenship) governed by an extreme rightwing government displaying most of the traits of Fascism - Militarism, Ultra-nationalism, reckless use if violence, even rabid racism against an etnic group they describe as “animals” - and the worst kind of Fascism at that, the could calculating hate-filled Germanic shit, not the “mild” version of places like Italy.

            If Israel were ever the good guys (maybe at some point after the architects of Nakba left power and before they murdered Yitzhak Rabin) they haven’t been it for a long time.

            Buy yeah, if you unskeptically consume the propaganda about Israel from the last couple of decades that portrays them as a western-like white people with humanitarian values, it’s natural you think it’s a country of “good guys”.

        • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          You may be shocked to find out that the Geneva Convention is not the whole extent of most people’s moral beliefs.

          • capital@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            What do your moral beliefs tell you about how to conduct a war with zero civilian casualties?

            We’d all like to know that would work.

            • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              1 year ago

              There’s a lot of fucking room between “zero civilian casualties” and the deliberat massacre that’s happening now. Fuck you and your false dichotomy.

              • capital@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Ahh ok. Tons of military strategists on lemmy lately. Who knew it was such a prevalent profession.

            • Eldritch@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              I get it. I’m the Pope. It ain’t easy. But you should know kiddo. Two wrongs don’t make a right. My buddy J.C. even says so. And I was unaware one could not be Zionist in the US. Solid logic there.

              What hamas did was horrible. What Israel has done since makes that pale in comparison. Well that’s not really fair. What Israel did before still made it pale in comparison. If you don’t like people calling you a Zionist stop carying their water. There are no good guys involved in this conflict. Unfortunately just collateral of innocent citizens. Both Israeli and mostly Palestinian. Israel however, is the one with the power to change all this.

              • capital@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                You can call me whatever. It literally means nothing to me lol.

                Civilian deaths fucking suck but when the group you’re fighting uses them as shields, the numbers are gonna be high.

                Edit: just looked up the term

                a political movement that was originally begun in order to establish an independent state for Jewish people, and now supports the development and protection of the state of Israel

                https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/english/zionism

                Huh. Looks like I’m a Zionist.

                • Eldritch@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  It’s great and all how you can never actually address what was said. Civilian deaths could be much less while still addressing the Hamas problem. But I’m glad that you have accepted the definition as a genocidal ethno nationalist. That’s what zionists are these days bubbala. And with how hard you are defending their genocidal extermination. Honestly I got to say it’s very believable on you. So you should really do yourself a mitzvah and read up on things a little better.

                  • capital@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    I literally posted the definition that I’m identifying with but I guess you’re welcome to read into it. It won’t be representative of reality but I can’t stop you.

                    Your comments are a little hard to read though so I’m tiring of this particular thread.