Self defense? Only on the battlefield? Only to achieve a ‘noble’ end?

        • BitSound@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          I realize we’re probably not going to convince each other over some internet comments, but that’s not a philosophy I’d sign up for. Morality is subjective, and I’d rather choose moral principles that don’t involve me accepting being massacred.

        • darq@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          A massacre, or a genocide, is more than just “one’s” life ending. It is one’s own life, the lives of one’s loved ones, and the lives of one’s people.

    • sngoose@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Just a curious question: Would that also apply to your loved ones being savagely killed?

        • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          You can do no violence but also feel sorrow at violence being done. Not only are those stances not incompatible but I’d argue they’re in alignment. Violence, done by you, to you or simply involving others, is an occurrence to weep for. Some people are being put through unnecessary pain and some people are of an unsound mind and believe putting others through pain is justified.

          I won’t judge someone who defends themselves for self preservation but I will applaud someone who continues to try and deescalate violence even as it’s being enacted on them… though I will clarify this is all at the adult level, children take some time to come to awareness of who and what other people are and are still growing into their full selves.