• @abhibeckert@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      51
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      The website should feed your password straight into a well known hashing algorithm or key derivation function that has undergone a decade or more of careful scrutiny, without any other processing. The output will usually be a fixed length base64 or hex string.

      There’s a short list of about three options that are currently considered acceptable, and a few more are probably fine but are a little too easy to crack these days (e.g. anything that shares the same math as bitcoin… what if someone throws a mining datacentre at your password?)

      If the site breaks, maybe you don’t to be a customer of that service.

      • @Vilian@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        88 months ago

        make one account with emoji password to test their system, if it break, good, go create hour account somewhere else

      • lemmyvore
        link
        fedilink
        English
        78 months ago

        It’s not the processing on the server that’s the problem. To reach the server the password needs to go through several layers of character encoding, if any of them fails the server will receive something different from what you meant. And when you try to login from another device and the layers will be different you’ll effectively be sending a different password.

        • @ricecake@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          48 months ago

          The same character encoding that would break emoji would break a significant portion of the words names, so if your system can’t handle it, then you deserve all the trouble that you run into.

          Unicode isn’t that hard.

          • Dark Arc
            link
            fedilink
            English
            18 months ago

            You’re not wrong, but some systems, especially smaller ones are intended for English-only situations (or originally were) so non-English language situations might not be as well tested and/or may cause things to break.

            Remember there are some sites that still refuse service if you put a " in your password. I’m not saying it’s right, but it’s a definite possibility.

          • Dark Arc
            link
            fedilink
            English
            18 months ago

            That is very much not a 90s problem. Especially if the company has a website and an app or is a small company not thinking about these things.

            In theory this shouldn’t be an issue but it definitely could be an issue on certain services.

    • Arin
      link
      fedilink
      27
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      auth servers breaking from emojis would be hilarious, pretty sure that’s why older auth servers only allow certain symbols in passwords

    • @Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      158 months ago

      If some auth server breaks because I put emojis in my password then that’s right and deserved

    • 50gp
      link
      fedilink
      6
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      and there are many trash implementations that dont recognise something like :emoticon: as shortcut and turn it into emoji, no no you have to use emoji keyboard to type them

    • @lolcatnip@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      48 months ago

      OTOH, there is only one character set that matters, and any system using a different one is, by that fact alone, broken.

      • Funwayguy
        link
        fedilink
        English
        248 months ago

        Hahaha, I wish.

        You would be amazed at how ancient and poorly maintained many web servers are on the modern internet. SQL injection still consistently make the top 3 web app vulnerabilities as of 2021. If that isn’t being sanitized properly I don’t expect emojis would be handled much better.

      • @jordanlund@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        7
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        For that particular bug, yes, but there have been many other variations on that theme and not limited to Apple tech. I’ve seen it nuke an email send for example because the SMTP server choked on emojis placed in a subject, to, or from line.

    • MoogleMaestro
      link
      fedilink
      598 months ago

      Security Experts probably don’t log into smart tvs all that often. Just a guess.

        • Jolteon
          link
          fedilink
          English
          48 months ago

          But why wouldn’t it make sense to need to pull the cab off of a pickup truck to change the spark plugs?

        • El Barto
          link
          fedilink
          English
          28 months ago

          That’s true for all car designers. You’re referring to the shitty designers, though.

          Architects don’t get involved in the actual construction of a building either.

          • Echo Dot
            link
            fedilink
            English
            6
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            Oh they do. They come to tell you that the safety protocols you’ve implemented are interfering with their design.

            They’d prefer it if it looked pretty and then just fell down and light breeze thank you very much

    • @Cavemanfreak@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      58 months ago

      All the apps I’ve used recently use QR codes (or similar measures, like a sync code) that has you log in from the phone, so it should work anyway!

      • kratoz29
        link
        fedilink
        English
        48 months ago

        But not all apps, sadly, I just experimented it with Crunchyroll, and saw my dad struggling with a crappy app called Vix yesterday.

      • Echo Dot
        link
        fedilink
        English
        28 months ago

        In my experience the only one that works with any degree of reliability is YouTube. Even the Netflix one can be fairly intermittent.

        Also a lot in the time you’ll go away and the hotel you’re in will have a smart TV and the software was last updated in 2011 so you have to sign in on the device.

      • @lolcatnip@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        6
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        I’ve had to manually type in passwords on a TV several times in the last few months because sometimes the login for even the biggest brand-name services is just broken.

  • Dizzy Devil Ducky
    link
    fedilink
    English
    628 months ago

    I’d rather staple my forehead to a telephone pole before I ever think about using an emoji in a password. Those things are abominations!

    • @snek_boi@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      24
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Out of curiosity, what makes you say so?

      Edit: Oh. Did a “Wooosh” happen to me right now? Are you being ironic and referring to the XKCD thing about how to make a secure password using words in phrases?

      • El Barto
        link
        fedilink
        English
        158 months ago

        I think OP is conflating the use of emojis in passwords with the use of emojis by the general public.

        Yes, it’s annoying to read stuff like “Hi 😃😃😃😃 I am Bob ♥️♥️♥️😎😎😎😎,” but that doesn’t mean that using them in passwords is a bad idea.

        • xor
          link
          English
          38 months ago

          Or that “hi 😊 I’m Bob” doesn’t express a (subtly) different meaning to “hi, I’m Bob”

          • El Barto
            link
            fedilink
            English
            18 months ago

            I can agree with you. I’m curious what these reasons are, though?

    • Echo Dot
      link
      fedilink
      English
      15
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Security experts don’t actually have to work on corporate IT systems.

      So you’ve set your password to contain a 😇 have you?
      Ok so how are you going to type it on this desktop computer keyboard here…
      Yeah I thought not.

      I’ll just go reset your password shall I?

      • voxel
        link
        fedilink
        English
        5
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        win+. (works on kde too afaik…?)

        • Echo Dot
          link
          fedilink
          English
          68 months ago

          I’ll let you be in charge of teaching them that. I literally had to talk someone through how to type an exclamation mark today, I don’t think they’re going to handle the extended Unicode character set.

  • @kromem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    538 months ago

    No. There’s only one piece of advice that should be given to users in 2023 about how to make their passwords stronger:

    Use a password manager

    Just use 32 character random alphanumeric passwords that are unique for each site (you can do more like 12-16 characters if you’ll ever need to enter manually).

    This is it. Stop trying to create clever passwords that you can remember. You aren’t as uniquely creative as you think and there’s been bodies of research into how the various things people do to create passwords that look secure can reduce the generation space so much that they become considerably easier to crack with an intelligent algorithm.

    Test your ability to be unpredictable

    • @shucks
      link
      English
      48 months ago

      I got it to a stable 54% by using an

      algorithm

      typing f or d for consonants and vowels respectively in sentences I thought up, switching languages regularly,

      and a stable 56% by just typing randomly and adjusting my patterns based on the colored output, which might have skewed my results. Certainly a very cool tool, I also liked the explanation linked on the page!

    • @vamputer@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      19
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      I like doing entire phrases with some rhymes thrown in. Makes it easier to remember them.

      “BonyTonyMoansHe’sOnlyGrownLonely” has a shitload of characters, and a full sentence (even a nonsensical one like that) is more memorable to me than a random handful of disparate words.

      The more ridiculous, the better. (And, naturally, don’t forget your numbers and symbols)

      EDIT: Actually, no idea why I made it all one group of words. So long as spaces are in the password’s character space (and they very well should be if friggin’ emojis are), there’s nothing stopping you from doing an entire, punctuated sentence- other than that we’ve been conditioned not to think of a password that way.

      “Skinny Kenny’s friend, Mini Ben, has 20 chins.” That should be a fully-acceptable password with 46 characters (48 if you add the quotes), capital letters, numbers, and special characters.

      • @scinde@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        48 months ago

        You can’t compare a 46 random character password to a password composed out of words, the entropy of each is very different. Your kind of password is vulnerable to dictionary attacks which are way more common and easy than brute forcing every possibility. A 50+ characters unique random password for each service that is stored in a password manager which is encrypted with a 20+ characters random password is the most secure and future proof (for now).

        • Aatube
          link
          fedilink
          4
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          If the attacker doesn’t know that you’re using a dictionary password, then dictionary attacks probably won’t be their first choice. I want to remember these passwords across devices and on guests.

          • @scinde@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            58 months ago

            Like someone else said on this thread; that’s just security by obscurity, which is bad. Dictionary attacks will be one of the first (brute force related) attacks attackers will use because word passwords are incredibly popular (though admittedly of fewer words: VeryBigDog34 etc…), and relatively easy to do. I agree that having the password across different devices is somewhat of a challenge with a password manager, but not impossible. My very long and complex password is all down to muscle memory by this point, I couldn’t tell you what it is from memory.

            Also you shouldn’t use the same password on multiple things and if you don’t use a password manager you will need to memorize a lot of different passwords.

        • ferret
          link
          fedilink
          English
          18 months ago

          Dictionary attacks aren’t some magic bullet. There are a lot of english words and just four of them IS comparable in cracking difficult to a standard 8-char password that is as random as you can make it. There are a lot more words than there are symbols. Four words is obviously not as good as 46 totally random chars

          • @scinde@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            18 months ago

            Dictionary attacks are definitely not a magic bullet, they require a lot of processing power, just like any other brute-force attack, but not more because of their longer length, as has been implied.

            True, there are a lot of english words, but the amount of common words is relatively small. Most people aren’t going to choose a password like “MachicolationRemonstranceCircumambulationSchadenfreude”, even if it were generated for them (which is unlikely).

            Sure, it is comparable to a standard 8 characters passward, but even that kind of password is verging on the insecure (it is the absolute minimum, which should be avoided when possible).

            There are also a lot of symbols when you count emojies and the entire Unicode standard.

    • Lupec
      link
      fedilink
      English
      118 months ago

      I love it, Bitwarden has supported generating passphrase style passwords for a while and it’s basically that. It’s my go-to these days.

      • El Barto
        link
        fedilink
        English
        6
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Got a source on that?

        Edit: plus brute forcing is just one scenario. I think the xkcd comic refers to using passwords in online services, and those usually have some sort of rate limiting.

        • @ammonium@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          98 months ago

          https://thesecurityfactory.be/password-cracking-speed/

          8 character a-zA-Z is 45 bits of entropy (log2(56^8), about the same as the XKCD password if you take from a 2048 word list. That’s crackable in a minute on AWS.

          Password hashes get frequently stolen, don’t rely on rate limiting if it’s something you really care about.

          Here are the dice ware recommendations on the number of words: https://theworld.com/~reinhold/dicewarefaq.html#howlong

          • El Barto
            link
            fedilink
            English
            48 months ago

            Sure, but the average English speaker knows way more than 2048 words. Let’s not forget about case sensitivity, made-up or “inside joke” words, names, and specific industry vocabulary.

            • @ammonium@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              68 months ago

              Even if you take four words of a 30000 word list (quick Google says that’s the number of words an average person knows), that’s still less bits of entropy than a 5 word diceware password (7776 word list). People are also really bad at randomness, so your own string of random words is likely going to be much worse.

    • @Ookami38@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      88 months ago

      I prefer picking a sentence or so that has meaning to me, using the first letters, and then adjusting for numbers/symbols. So if I wanted to make that a pw, it’d be 1ppa505thm2m,utfl,atafn/5. -looks completely unintelligible, but as long as you can remember the sentence and have some ideas of how you would have encoded it, easy enough to remember/recreate.

          • lemmyvore
            link
            fedilink
            English
            3
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            If you’re using a password manager you don’t need phrases you can remember, you can generate even more secure passwords. Or start using passkeys.

          • @noodlejetski@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            18 months ago

            I am, and I’m not jumping through hoops of making up a password sentence for every new website. I let Bitwarden take care of that for me.

            • @Ookami38@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              28 months ago

              Just use these methods for the pws you either need to know (like your password manager) or don’t want stored for whatever reason, like your bank. Otherwise, yeah, just let your password manager generate a password for whatever site.

              • Aatube
                link
                fedilink
                18 months ago

                Guest machines too. And I sorta prefer whichever browser/OS I’m using’s implementation because they’re usually styled similarly.

        • @Ookami38@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          It’s as easy to remember a bunch of those as it is remembering 4 random words with no association, I think. And besides, just use that for the big, important, pws like your pw manager.

  • Sparking
    link
    fedilink
    English
    428 months ago

    Until you get to a prompt that doesn’t support unicode.

    • @fosstulate@iusearchlinux.fyi
      link
      fedilink
      English
      48 months ago

      Two of my colleagues still use locally stored plaintext for individual work credentials, despite having been shown where the password manager is. Both have accessed their files in front of me. If it’s not in those files it’s saved in the browser (because convenience is a hell of a drug). Now you start to see why discrete managers have a hard time, even amongst technology workers.

    • Polar
      link
      fedilink
      English
      30
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Antisocial people.

      It was the same on Reddit. All of the people who despised emojis were often posting in really cringe and incel related subs.

      My use of emojis sky rocketed after I started dating. They are fun and convey emotion really well.

      • @Honytawk@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        118 months ago

        I’m convinced emojis are what has been missing from language for a long time. They are great way to portray emotions through texts, which otherwise could not be achieved.

        This way there is a difference between:

        “You are so amazing 😁👍”

        and

        "You are so amazing 🙄 "

        • Echo Dot
          link
          fedilink
          English
          78 months ago

          "You are so amazing 🙄 "

          Greatest put down ever.

        • @mbp@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          58 months ago

          If I’m going to be relaying through to people strictly over text as much as I do these days, I better have a way to articulate it with the right emotional range to match my sparkling personality ✨

    • @pewgar_seemsimandroid
      link
      English
      188 months ago

      💀💀💀💀💀💀💀🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🚣👍👍👍👍👍👍🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥 sigma

      the emojis and text above are a part of the reason

    • ArxCyberwolf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      178 months ago

      People who use them tend to spam the hell out of them. Like, 8 of the same emoji. And they use them every other sentence. It’s obnoxious, you only need one or two to get the point across.

    • @xthexder@l.sw0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      178 months ago

      Back in my day we only had 95 printable characters, and that’s the way we liked it! /s

    • @schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      28 months ago

      They didn’t exist yet when I was an early teenager, all we had were emoticons that might be replaced by images by the forum software, so of course I think they’re stupid /s

      Without sarcasm, it is a good thing we have standardized symbols now and don’t have to implement emoticon replacement into forum or chat or social media software. If only because half of such implementations replaced any occurrence of the number 8 followed by a closing parenthesis with 😎 even when that wasn’t the intended meaning (one can think of many other times one would end a parenthetical statement with the number 8).

  • @BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    318 months ago

    Sounds great where it works but I’m sure most systems would reject an emoji or make you type out some overly complex password in addition to your emoji.

    • @Toribor@corndog.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      148 months ago

      Honestly you’d be surprised how many places it just works magically. I was surprised to find that Office365 users could use emojis in names for Microsoft Teams which had no problem syncing those accounts back to an on-prem Active Directory. You can use emojis to name a whole SQL database, let alone users/passwords on it.

      I keep wondering if I need to figure out how to turn that off but it hasn’t caused any problems. It’s definitely sketchy looking though when you see a bunch of normal usernames and then suddenly one is just ten snowman emojis in a row.

      • @Honytawk@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        98 months ago

        Emojis are just a string of special characters that get recognised and replaced by an image anyway. It is the same as using those special characters separately.

    • Echo Dot
      link
      fedilink
      English
      98 months ago

      It’s all just Unicode so in theory a password system shouldn’t think that emoji or any more interesting than any other character. To a computer the letter B and the emoji ✈️ equivalent in that they’re both just normal characters that one can type.

      Sort of, emoji are usually treated as two or more normal characters so ✈️ might be equivalent to BB. But the basic point is the same.

    • Dark Arc
      link
      fedilink
      English
      28 months ago

      It should work reasonably well in password systems that hash the password from a UTF-8 encoding… Which should be most things really. If the system is trying to process everything with ASCII, maybe not. It might even appear to work but get converted to some other character (which is kind of the worst case)… That should be rare in web applications though

  • @Treczoks@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    198 months ago

    Completely useless from many sources where I have to rely on a keyboard for entering passwords.