Image description: a screenshot from the Wikipedia page for the Doctor Who TV series, with a user-added caption that reads “Preserve the media you can before it’s gone forever.” The Wikipedia article reads, “No 1960s episodes exist on their original videotapes (all surviving prints being film transfers), though some were transferred to film for editing before transmission and exist in their broadcast form. [88] Some episodes have been returned to the BBC from the archives of other countries that bought prints for broadcast or by private individuals who acquired them by various means. Early colour videotape recordings made off-air by fans have also been retrieved, as well as excerpts filmed from the television screen onto 8 mm cine film and clips that were shown on other programmes. Audio versions of all lost episodes exist from home viewers who made tape recordings of the show. Short clips from every story with the exception of Marco Polo (1964), “Mission to the Unknown” (1965) and The Massacre (1966) also exist.”

  • wharsmetoothpicson@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    ·
    1 year ago

    There was documentary done a few years back on the comedian Bob Monkhouse and about his obsession archiving media, a lot of which were thought to be lost forever. He had multiple VHS players set up around his house to record things in an era where not many of the general public had one. He also kept tv guides and had written into the margins if there was a change in the schedule. He was actually taken to court in the 70’s for copyright infringement but the case was thrown out, though quite a few items from his archive were seized and never returned.

  • floofloof@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I wish there were something like bittorrent that worked better as an archival mechanism. The weakness of bittorrent is that material tends to disappear completely when there is no longer widespread popular interest in it.

    • MickeySwitcherooney@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      1 year ago

      Was just thinking about this. Usenet guarantees a certain amount of time ~10 years, and a torrent only lasts as long as people are willing to seed. The problem is, long term seeding takes up too much individual space, and I never know when it’s necessary. Obviously I’m not wasting 500GB of storage to seed something with 100+ seeders. More trackers should offer bonus points for things with less than 2-3 seeders to ensure long term survival of the media.

      • droans@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        Usenet doesn’t guarantee any time at all. Content is purged regularly if it’s not being downloaded.

  • teft@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    1 year ago

    Don’t even have to go that far back. Look at Netflix removing the DnD Community episode because Chang dresses as a drow elf (black skin, white hair). He even says he’s a drow in the episode yet Netflix removed it from the series since it was “racist”. Without pirates that episode would quickly be forgotten.

      • Dr Cog@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        1 year ago

        Removing an episode for being racist (even though this one wasn’t racist) is not cultural genocide. Wearing blackface (I know, this wasn’t blackface) is not a culture that needs to be preserved.

        • 520@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Our mistakes as a culture absolutely need to be preserved in order to prevent history from repeating itself long after the people making said mistakes have passed on.

          Not every part of preservation should be a celebration of the past. It is as vitally important that we learn the things we did wrong as well as right.

          Just do what WB did and add a slide saying that these were products of their time and that we know better today.

  • Chewy@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    1 year ago

    While I agree that piracy can be preservation of media, it’s most often not the case.

    Streaming torrents directly or through real-debrid doesn’t help preserve media at all. Leeching only without keeping torrents alive also doesn’t keep media accessible.

    Some people might store media for a few decades and then reupload, but most people never create new torrents.

    I’d say the pirates who help preserve media are a small subset of pirates.

    • sir_reginald@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      1 year ago

      read OP’s post. if it not were for privacy in the first place and people ripping media, there wouldn’t be any copy left of those shows.

      Of course not all pirates archive, but there’s an important percentage that do. Non-pirates are running out of options because each year less and less audiovisual productions release as physical media (old DVDs, more recently blue rays) and are only available through a subscription model where you do not own the actual content.

      So piracy is pretty much the only route available to archive a lot of content.

      • Chewy@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        You’re right, piracy is often the only way to archive media. Many releases aren’t available on BluRay in all regions. It’s thanks to those people who go through the trouble and rip media.

        I meant to comment above on how not all piracy helps preserve media.

    • HumanPerson@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I can’t tell if you are saying only ripping content helps preserve it or that seeding does too. I download things but seed them as long as possible. (Technically until I run out of disk space, but that hasn’t happened yet and I think I will upgrade before it does.) Considering how many pirates download things and keep seeding, I think the pirates that don’t help preserve stuff could be the minority.

      • Chewy@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Seeding definitely helps preserve media. My comment meant to say that many people pirate media without seeding like ddl, usenet or leeching on public trackers. E.g. because they don’t have good upload or not enough storage.

      • Damage@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The problem with BitTorrent is that seeding libraries usually don’t survive a change or upgrade of the client, you’d have to find all the original .torrents and point the client at the right folders, praying it doesn’t overwrite the with empty files for some reason.

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    1 year ago

    There’s all the remasters and tweaks as well. Star Wars is the obvious example, but even things like Red Dwarf got messed with with awful looking CGI plastered in.

    • UKFilmNerd@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      At least they realised Red Dwarf tinkering was a bad idea and the originals still safely exist. I think they said they used the original negatives for Star Wars which were spliced and used for the Special Editions. They kept telling the public the original negatives for untouched Star Wars no longer exist. I can’t believe that’s true though. George keeps a copy of everything. There even a cut of Star Wars that used rear screen protection instead of blue screen!

      • d00phy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        The 4k77 guys pretty much provided what fans have been asking for. Lucas had his chance and chose to charge the fans for something they didn’t ask for.

      • GFY@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Odds are George personally owns the originals and was able to retain them as part of the terms of the sale to Disney.

        He doesn’t want them to be released and this is how he prevents it

  • UKFilmNerd@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    1 year ago

    Reminds me of Fraggle Rock. Due to the television station that produced the show being taken over many times over the years, most of the original broadcast masters have been lost. I think all episodes have been found but they’re mostly at home VHS recordings.

    • JetpackJackson@feddit.deOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Oh wow. I’ve never even heard of that show. I chose Doctor Who for my post because of it’s cultural influence and because I love the show, but it’s just crazy to think how much more lesser known media gets lost the same way

      • UKFilmNerd@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I forgot to mention, this was specifically relevant to the UK version of Fraggle Rock as each country has different wraparounds.

        The British inserts were filmed first at the TVS Television Theatre in Gillingham, Kent, and later at their larger studio complex in Maidstone (the former since closed and demolished) and presents Fraggle Rock as a rock-filled sea island with a lighthouse. Exterior footage was that of St Anthony’s Lighthouse located near Falmouth in Cornwall. The lighthouse keeper is The Captain (played by Fulton Mackay), a retired sailor who lives with his faithful dog Sprocket. In the third season, as MacKay had died in 1987, the role was played by John Gordon Sinclair as P.K., (the Captain’s nephew) and in the fourth and final season by Simon O’Brien as B.J. (son of the lighthouse’s owner, Mr. Bertwhistle). In 2014, 35 of these British wraparounds were still missing, believed wiped, although subsequent recoveries have gradually reduced this number.[7] As of December 2020, all 96 wraparounds have been found and handed over to the BFI, confirming that the entire UK production still exists in some shape or form.[8] Nickelodeon repeated it in the UK from 1993, as did Boomerang and Cartoonito in 2007. The episodes shown were the original North American versions.

  • Adalast@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 year ago

    I had the brilliant idea the other day of passing an amendment to the copywrite laws to include “independent distributors” for media that is abandoned or removed from active sale/distribution by its copywrite holder. The stipulation is that “independent distributors” are not allowed to make money in any way from the provided service and if the holder wants to rerelease something or remake it, the ID has to pull that title until the holder pulls it from circulation again. I would also put the stipulation on holders that any release has to be materially similar and at a fair market price. They are not allowed to re-release a game from 30 years ago at full modern retail, remakes have to be the same game to count (FFVII:remake would not count, but the updated PC releases of FFVII would), and the sales must be readily available to all citizens in the country (so releasing something on your JP store exclusively does not preclude the independent distribution in the states).

    The concept is exactly this. Legalize the preservation of media and art for future generations and allow free access to it, something akin to a digital online museum of games, movies, television shows, and commercials. If a content owner is not willing to make money from it, then there can be no damages.

      • Adalast@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I hadn’t ever checked out GOG. Cool stuff, but looking at their free stuff, I beg to differ on your interpretation. I am describing the legalization of the distribution of ROMs, movies/tv shows that are either unairing or undistributed in modern formats, or package software that is either abandoned or has had support dropped for it. Essentially, being able to get a copy of Windows 95 or an old version of Photoshop.

        Also, GOG looks to primarily be a storefront for game sales, not a free-access repository. The major stipulation in my idea is that the “independent distributor” is not allowed to profit from the content. So no selling it. It has to be done entirely at their own expense.

  • HumanPerson@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t have the originals, but I am happy to say I have all of the 1963 and 2005 Doctor Whos (with the exception of some new stuff… I should really get sonarr.) They are on i2p and I am still seeding if anyone wants them.

  • MolochAlter@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is extremely common with media that is seen as “artless” mass market as well. Dr. Who was pulp and not deemed worth preserving.

    Another example is the show that made me get into model making: Art Attack. A disney show made in the UK that was never collected or released in the original version.

    There are some torrents of the Hindi version apparently, but that’s all.

  • Khotetsu@lib.lgbt
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Reminds me of how something like 60% of video games only exist as emulators, because companies never bothered to preserve them in any form. There was even a remake of a game in the past few years that still had the Skidrow logo in it, because the devs had to go and torrent a pirated copy of the game since the original code was gone and they forgot to remove the cracker’s logo. There was also the infamous GTA remake that was made from the phone version of the game for the same reason.

  • helenslunch@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Sorry to be that guy but if the tapes were never preserved it’s probably because nobody cared…

    • Tangentism@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      1 year ago

      The BBC stupidly recycled the tapes because they didn’t give much credence at the time to how important their archive would become.

      • UKFilmNerd@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        This was a common practice, especially during a certain decade but I forget which. Old tapes were erased to be used again. No thought was given to preserving what was being wiped.

    • 520@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      People absolutely do care. These lost media include the origins of shows that are still relevant today. But backups weren’t exactly treated with much care until relatively recently.

    • SkyeStarfall
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      I highly doubt it would have cost much to preserve a few of the original tapes.