ickplant@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 2 years agoPaniki.postimg.ccimagemessage-square131linkfedilinkarrow-up11.29K
arrow-up11.29KimagePaniki.postimg.ccickplant@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 2 years agomessage-square131linkfedilink
minus-squarevortic@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up44·edit-22 years agoI’d forgotten this trick. It works for large numbers too. 122,300,223÷3 = 40,766, 741 1+2+2+3+2+2+3 = 15
minus-squareFlexibleToast@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up25·2 years agoThe neat part is that if you add the numbers together and they’re still too large to tell, you can do it again. In your example, you get 15. If you do it again, you get 6, which isn’t the best example because 15 is pretty obvious, but it works.
minus-squarepostmateDumbass@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 years agoProve it for 2, then un-distribute.
minus-squareRodeo@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 years agoThere is a mathematical proof that 1 + 1 = 2 so surely you could make a proof for 6 ÷ 3 = 2
I’d forgotten this trick. It works for large numbers too.
122,300,223÷3 = 40,766, 741
1+2+2+3+2+2+3 = 15
threw up and died while reading this
I wish I could read 😞
Just squint and wing it.
That is way too accurate. Lol
Also works with 9s!
The neat part is that if you add the numbers together and they’re still too large to tell, you can do it again. In your example, you get 15. If you do it again, you get 6, which isn’t the best example because 15 is pretty obvious, but it works.
But how do I prove it for 6
Get 6 apples. Duh.
Prove it for 2, then un-distribute.
There is a mathematical proof that 1 + 1 = 2 so surely you could make a proof for 6 ÷ 3 = 2