• Laser@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    94
    ·
    1 year ago

    Or you know use your browser’s tools to just edit stuff directly, it’s much less work, like 100% real and is absolutely free?

    Editing a picture is absolutely unnecessary

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        1 year ago

        Also I don’t really want to have to deal with Adobe in their BS “everything’s a subscription now” model.

        Especially if I only want the program for 5 minutes

      • Laser@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        In this case, I recommend using something like LibreOffice Draw, granted it’s not that easy but still easier than using image editing and cheaper than Adobe Acrobat

        Edit: I also didn’t know this, but draw, being a vector graphics tool, can also edit the text in PDFs. Granted it’s not convenient because PDFs in general aren’t. Still better than shelling out money to Adobe

        • Kraivo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Nobody buys Adobe’s shit in my world unless they become professional so they have no excuse

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Did this back in the day to “update” my eye prescription so I could make an order. All I had was paper.

    • darcy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      gimp is so difficult tho 😅 paint…net and pinta are simpler open source alternatives (w less features) for ppl who dont want to learn gimp

    • DudeDudenson@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I might or might have not spent 3 hours in a workday trying to figure out how to get the cut out tool to work in gimp for a WhatsApp sticker.

      I guess that’s both and indicative of gimp being as friendly as Unix and how much I hate Adobe’s business model

    • TheSlad@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 year ago

      Various tenent/landlord laws make it a real pain in the ass to evict a tenent (as it should be for most cases). Property owners respond by heavily vetting prospective tenents and want to make sure that rent will not be delinquent (i dont blame them tbh).

      The solution of course, is more high density low cost housing. But thats not what capitalism wants 🤷🏼‍♂️

      • lorty@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Why go for small margins selling homes to people that actually want to live in them rather than get a big return selling to speculator/landlords?

    • Ms. ArmoredThirteen@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      1 year ago

      In Seattle it is becoming common to require 4x rent in pay, some places it is at 5x. Because rent here is so high it basically dwarfs all other costs. 4-5x rent could mean a $100k job with enough left over after living expenses to max out a 401k and have entertainment funds.

      Someone looking to foothold in the area and ‘just get by’ could still be able to afford rent and cheap living, not all the other stuff like going out or retirement, but get blocked by high income requirements. This leaves them with the choice of “screw you we don’t want poors” or “commute an hour plus and shift rent costs to car costs and extra pollution”.

      It isn’t as simple as “they can’t afford it” when in a lot of cases you literally can but landlords are setting unreasonable bars.

        • Ms. ArmoredThirteen@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m not sure why some places require 5x rent in income it is wildly excessive. My personal theory (based on hunches only I have found no evidence for this) is they want to only attract tenants who are less likely to leave after a year or two of 10% rent increases. They may also be trying to push gentrification by making sure only well off people enter a neighborhood, fuelling the need for more “luxury” apartments to be built and perpetuating their industry. Idk, they’re pretty tight lipped about the reasoning if someone has more insight into their motives I would love to know

        • Ookami38@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          The idea is they’d prefer to be picky because there’s practically infinite demand and artificially low supply. They can vet all but the most guaranteed to pay out, mitigate risk, and make more money.

        • kemsat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Maintenance & overhead costs could mean that it’s not profitable, or barely so, which means they could be employing some strategy to cause a sale. That would give them massive funds to find more profitable & less risky endeavors.

    • Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s so stupid right now. The lease asked for bank statements, savings accounts, paycheck stubs and credit reports?!

      I make six figures and they want my savings?

      • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Very happy we don’t live in a big city right now then, we just got a new loan on a 2 bedroom apartment that’s pretty much new and the landlord accepted to let us bring our small dog and didn’t check shit after I told her we just sold our condo… She’s got no proof of anything…

    • bitsplease@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not necessarily - some income requirements are kind of crazy, like they need your rent to be less than 20% of your takehome income.

      Especially nowadays with rent being more expensive than ever and generally making up a bigger portion of people’s budget than before (by necessity), it’s not that uncommon to spend half or more of your take home on rent. Especially somewhere like NYC

    • LordKitsuna@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      The problem is that many people can afford it, but the apartments want them to have absolutely asinine levels of income. Many apartments are starting to ask for anywhere from 3 to 4 times the rent in monthly income. And considering that even a one bedroom apartment in many cities is starting to cost upwards of over $2,000 they want you to make $6,000 to $8,000 in monthly income at which point why the actual fuck would I be looking for a shitty one bedroom apartment. They already asked for first month rent last month rent and a deposit that should be enough to prove that I’m capable of managing my money

    • bdonvr@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Or maybe it means the fuckers want to see 4-5x rent. That would be nice but I promise I can survive on less and still pay the rent

      • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        The fuck? 😐 Damn, my new landlord asked for a phone number to confirm one of us had a job and I don’t think she even called…

        • Gerbler@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Give your friends number and vice versa. It’s fun to pretend to be a landlord.

          • ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Suppose you’re in tech suport and yet another person just storms in, needeing Adobe on their computer. Companies have different products, and mistaking one for another is obviously miscommunication!

            To be honest, I am prone to inefficient communication because every word spoken to me in person I have to pay attention & react to drains my emotional battery significantly, and it only takes several redundant words before I start screaming at people. I can restrain myself in public but that only makes me more exhausted in private, and when my grandma slowly answers “What kind of tea is this?” with “I made it an hour ago so that you don’t burn your throat”, all I hear is 13 words that get nothing across and I go berserk. (The correct answer is just “Mint” – I can see it’s not smoking.)

            People get upset over less significant things.