A man who killed and ate a man has been released back into public life after ten years.

Tyree Smith, from Bridgeport, Connecticut, killed a homeless man and then ate his brain and eyeballs according to officials.

The horrific case made headline news, with Smith found not guilty of murder by reason of insanity after a July 2013 trial.

In lieu of a stint behind bars, Smith was ordered committed to a state psychiatric hospital for 60 years.

But now, ten years after the grim incident, the state Psychiatric Security Review Board said Smith was ready to be transitioned back into the community.

Smith has been released from the facility, Connecticut’s most secure, as of writing.

He will be living in a Waterbury group home, and is not allowed to associate with anyone involved in criminal activity.

The board stated in its report: “Tyree Smith is an individual with a psychiatric illness requiring care, custody and treatment.

“Since his last hearing Tyree Smith has continued to demonstrate clinical stability.

“Mr. Smith is medication compliant, actively engaged in all recommended forms of treatment, and has been symptom-free for many years.”

During the trial, Smith’s cousin Nicole Rabb claimed he arrived at her Connecticut home in December 2011, talking about Greek gods and ruminating about needing to go out and get blood.

When she saw him the next evening she noticed what appeared to be specks of blood on his pants and that he was carrying chopsticks and a bloody ax.

Smith then allegedly told Rabb he killed a man and ate his brains in the Lakeview Cemetery while drinking sake, and grimly warned he intended to eat more people.

A month later, police found Angel Gonzalez’s mutilated body in the vacant apartment on Brooks Street in Bridgeport where Smith had lived as a child.

Police later recovered the bloody ax and an empty bottle of sake in a stream bed near the Boston Avenue cemetery.

The defense’s case rested on the testimony of Yale University psychiatrist Dr. Reena Kapoor, who testified that Smith had kept his lust for human flesh after his arrest, even offering to eat her.

Kapoor claimed Smith suffered from psychotic incidents since childhood and heard voices that told him to kill people.

She then said the voices ordered Smith to eat the victim’s brain so they would get a better understanding of human behavior and the eyes so that they could see into the “spirit realm.”

Kapoor added that Smith went to Subway after eating the man’s body parts.

The report on Smith’s release said: “He denied experiencing cravings but stated that if they were to arise, he would reach out to his hospital and community supports and providers.”

  • BluJay320
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    248
    ·
    1 year ago

    Some of y’all really need to figure out the difference between punishment and rehabilitation…

    And which one actually works.

    Stop stroking your hate boners and start advocating for real solutions. You don’t fix pain with more pain. All that does is exacerbate the cycle.

    • Earthwormjim91@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      1 year ago

      He ended someone’s life. That alone should remove him from society forever.

      Now his entire release hinges on him being compliant with his meds to not end someone else’s life.

        • Hawk@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          So if your brakes stop working and you run someone over tomorrow, you should be removed from society forever?

          Accidentally spread COVID to your grandma and she died? Life in prison for you!

          Had a stillbirth? Goodbye society, put the wench behind bars.

          Obviously that’s the dumbest take I’ve ever heard. How do people have so little empathy they can’t even imagine what a mental issue like that could even be like. These people are sick and not in control.

          If we have highly educated people who can accurately take measures to cure these people, I’m 100% supporting this. More yet, if the US cared only a tiny bit more about healthcare, cases like this would easily be avoided.

          People who voted for those not giving a fuck killed the man, maybe you, the voter should be jailed too, according to your rethoric?

          • RealFknNito@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’ve said it 3 times in other threads on this same post but I’ll make it four since apparently I didn’t say it on this one. Manslaughter isn’t the same. I’m talking about premeditated, malicious intent to rob someone from their family and loved ones. Those people are beyond redemption. Beyond correction. They should not get a second chance.

            • Hawk@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              Yes, so the cannibal does not belong in prison as you say. There was no premeditated, malicious intent. How could there be, if you’re not in the right mind.

              Not seeing that is the big issue here.

              • RealFknNito@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                That’s unusual. So because they didn’t choose the mental illness, they’re absolved of the effects it has? So really the only thing drunk drivers are at fault for is the first drink. After that, they can’t be held responsible. “Not in the right mind” as you say.

                • RedAggroBest@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  You’re right that the drunk driver is only responsible for the first drink. The first drink is what caused the accident in the first place. What happened to manslaughter isn’t murder anyways? That drunk driver very much chose to drink that night and didn’t take measure to stop themselves from doing something dangerous, which justifies a manslaughter charge, like getting a ride to the bar.

                  That’s very different from someone being mentally ill and absolutely unable to control when those voices start screaming in their head to kill someone.

                  • RealFknNito@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    But hey that first drink isn’t illegal, it’s everything they did after they’re ‘mentally impaired’ so they shouldn’t be held responsible for the second drink or getting behind the wheel. It wasn’t their choice, right? This line of logic is deeply flawed. If we expect people who are drunk to take measures not to harm others in spite of their mental impairment, we should expect the same for the mentally ill.

            • BluJay320
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              You keep using those words… “premeditated” and “malicious intent”…

              Do you… understand mental illness at all?

            • CoderKat@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              By nature of successfully being considered legally insane (which is not easy to do), he doesn’t have malicious intent, though. Not in the eyes of the law. By being not in the right mind, it’s as if it wasn’t actually him that committed the crime.

              We should be making decisions based on facts, not emotions. It’s easy for a horrible crime to make us feel “what the fuck, he should rot in prison”. But ask yourself why the insanity defense even exists if not to allow seriously ill people to be helped.

      • BluJay320
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        66
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        If the guy was truly determined by actual professionals (aka: not you) to be fit to return to society, then what’s the issue?

        What gain does anyone get from unnecessarily punishing him longer? It’s just a waste of time and resources to inflict pain on an individual because people can’t accept that someone can change.

        Punishment does very little in the way of teaching a lesson. Do some actual research.

        Edit: furthermore, this was an incident of mental illness and a severe psychological break. You can’t punish that out of someone. That makes no sense. This man needed serious help, got it, and has been compliant with his treatment.

            • RealFknNito@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              1 year ago

              An indicator of a capable society would be permanently excluding the people who do such horrid things that it’s considered a niche. Another indicator would be not allowing such truly revolting people the ability to circumvent the minimum 20 years for premeditated murder plus whatever fucking cannibalism adds onto it by pleading insanity and having a board of professionals give a thumbs up.

              He robbed someone of their life. Of their future. Not by accident or negligence but intentionally and planned. But hey, I hope someone defends the guy that scoops your brain out of your skull, eats it like a steak dinner, then goes free in a couple years because hey, he’s all better now :) Utterly absurd.

          • Chetzemoka@startrek.website
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            1 year ago

            There’s a wide gulf of distance between someone with antisocial personality disorder or psychopathy who fully intends to murder another person and someone experiencing profound psychosis to the point that they don’t even know that their own actions are real. This guy was found not guilty by reason of insanity in the first place because he’s the latter and not the former. The latter can be safe in public, if adherent to medication regimens, therapy, and monitoring. The former must be housed away from the public for life.

            I say that as a healthcare professional with experience with both people who have severe psychiatric disorders and also people who are in prison. The original court found this man actually did not have murderous intent and that makes all the difference.

          • UnlimitedRumination [he/him]@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            1 year ago

            I think people like you are a hair from being as insane as the people they lock up.

            Since I fully agree with what the commenter you’re replying to said, I’ll assume you’re lumping me into that group too.

            Sure, call me insane. Call me crazy. Call me fucking nuts and say I need a straight jacket. Whatever floats your boat.

            You’re not one of the people that can lock me up though and it’s pretty clear why. So just remember that “crazy” motherfuckers like me are driving next to you on the freeway, shopping behind you in the grocery store, living down the hall, etc. We could lose it at any point!

            Fear of what you don’t understand and ignoring expert opinions are destroying society. Which side of that would you like to be on?

            Plus, you’re talking to another human being, it’s just fucking disrespectful.

          • BluJay320
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I think people like you are a hair from being as insane as the people they lock up.

            Better look over your shoulder then, buddy. We’re everywhere

        • Very_Bad_Janet@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          1 year ago

          He wasn’t punished. He was “found not guilty of murder by reason of insanity” and placed in a state psychiatric hospital. That’s not punishment, that is treatment and care. That’s also why he is being released - they have determined that he is stable enough to be back in society. (I have my doubts that he will remain stable without being in a psychiatric hospital but I guess we’ll all see.)

        • jasory@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          1 year ago

          “What gain does someone get from unnecessarily punishing him longer?” Safety. If you have someone who commits a premeditated murder (insane or not). Then granting them the opportunity to do it again is a serious risk.

          Additionally, schizophrenia doesn’t just completely go away. Most cases are episodic, the fact that he is fine now does not mean he’s “cured”. You at the very minimum need to be able to force continuous treatment until his death.

          The fact that punishing people serves little utility, doesn’t mean that you should release murderers. The fact that protecting society by imprisoning people, “punishes” the people does not mean that you shouldn’t protect society by imprisoning people.

          • BluJay320
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            1 year ago

            You clearly don’t understand any of the psychology behind this. Stop pretending you do.

        • BolexForSoup@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Your comment was good and all but really I just want to tell you I love your profile picture. Don’t see enough ODST love out there. The Superintendent was such a great idea

          • BluJay320
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Hell yea! Still sad there was never a sequel, it was such a unique experience

            • RealFknNito@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              11
              ·
              1 year ago

              Murder is 20 to life. How did he get half the minimum sentencing? Ah, plead insanity and then wiggled around the system by getting a clean bill of health so long as he stays on his meds.

              What happens if he misses a dose? Hell I missed mine today because I got busy. My blood pressure is a little high but he might decide to kill and eat someone.

              Why the fuck is that an acceptable risk to you?

                • RealFknNito@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  10
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Man murdered another man, consumed his brain, and got out in half the minimum sentencing time. There is no further context or situation that remedies this, despite how desperate you are to do so.

                  • Fredselfish@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    7
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    People who had weed on them get more time then this. My last comment got downvoted but when he does it again I will be here to say I told them so.

                  • DrPop@lemmy.one
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Did you read the party where he was sentenced to 60 years? The system was ready to keep him for basically his whole life.

          • BluJay320
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            1 year ago

            Maybe you missed the part of severe mental health issues?

            This guy didn’t just wake up one day and decide “hey, I’m going to eat someone :)”

            Do everyone a favor and don’t comment on things you clearly know nothing about.

            • RealFknNito@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Cool - he shouldn’t be welcomed back into society if those issues are to fucking murder and eat someone. I don’t give a shit how enlightened you think you are, someone should not suffer because you have a boner for “giving everyone a chance at recovery :)” The group of people insane or malicious enough to premeditate their kills is small enough I’m comfortable putting them in a box until they die so nobody else has to be murdered with a fucking axe and eaten you absolute loon.

              • BluJay320
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                Well it’s a good thing you don’t make these decisions :)

                Try being less sadistic

    • GreenMario@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 year ago

      Naw this dude is damaged goods. What happens when they cut his meds or if he stops taking it? Other peoples brains gonna be looking very tasty in that group home.

      No, this a death penalty thing and that’s a mercy. You kill a guy and eat his brains there’s no coming back, just kill the bastard cheaply and use the resources to rehabilitate someone that can readjust like a drug user.

      Planets fucking full anyways to keep a cannibal alive tbh. Make room for good people.

        • GreenMario@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Lol you ain’t wrong. Maybe we can air drop a bunch into a gated community somewhere 🤔

      • BluJay320
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        So, resolve a murder with more murder… Yeah, that’s a real great solution

        • GreenMario@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s kinda how we dealt with shit for millenia. One thing about humans is we are very good at making more.

          Too bad the guy who got his brain ate can’t be rehabilitated.

          • BluJay320
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            One thing about humans is we are very good at making more.

            By that logic, let the man keep eating brains. Let the man eat YOUR brain. You’re clearly not using it, and we can always just make another person to replace you, right?

            • GreenMario@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Fine! But I get to try to kill him first. If he can beat me he can have my stupid fucking brain. Being alive sucks anyways. You’re doing me a favor. One less wage slave for the corporations OH NO!!!

      • Walk_blesseD
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Planets fucking full anyways

        Piss off with this Malthusian bullshit, will you?

          • Walk_blesseD
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            A problem easily avoided by using more space efficient modes of transportation, and also not particularly relevant to my objection that overpopulation is a Malthusian myth.

            • GreenMario@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Which will never happen because you’d have to rip up cities and replan them.

              But whatever I’m sure your gonna say it’s a “matter of resource distribution” not a space problem but I’ll just say this, we will never solve the distro problem because of greed.

              Plus every new person born is gonna generate a shit ton of carbon. They’re gonna need a place to live. That’s space that used to be an ecosystem.

              So idk maybe you want the planet to be turned into Courascant (one big planet sized city). Sure there’s space for trillions of humans if we stack em up high! Good luck feeding them.

    • squirrelwithnut@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      The problem is our justice system only focuses on the punishment part. Rehabilitation is either non-existent for most inmates or completely inadequate. The likelihood of this man being mentally stable enough to be safely reintegrated into public life is extremely small.

      • Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 year ago

        He didn’t go to prison though, he went to a pysch ward, seems like exactly the kind of thing you’d be advocating for.

      • BluJay320
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        So the fault lies with the inadequacy of the justice and healthcare system. But my point still stands - simply locking someone away does nothing to actually help.

      • braxy29@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        maybe not… a high profile case like this may well have attracted the attention of more competent psychiatrists, or motivated his care team/state to seek it out. it also seems possible to me that his psychosis was very treatable with the right meds, but that he had not been able to access that care previously.

        so yeah. mental health care is health care, and in this case it’s important not only to the well-being of Mr. Smith but to his community as well. i agree with you that, for the american “justice” system, most cases are treated as it punishment is the correct response.

      • BluJay320
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        1 year ago

        Serious mental health treatment, rehabilitation, and medication. Extensive monitoring by mental health professionals, routine check-ins… Basically what they’ve done.

        I’m not saying just release the dude, wash their hands of him, and say “good luck”…

      • BluJay320
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Evidently you don’t understand the prevalence and severity of mental health issues, cause this could happen anywhere…

        Unfortunately our healthcare system is so fucked up, and society is full of people like you that would rather hurt people than help them, that this sort of thing is only exacerbated.

        Stop being part of the problem. Be part of the solution.

    • CaptFeather@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The US justice system unfortunately runs on emotion and punishment rather than rehabilitation, thanks in no small part to the whole privatized prison system. The average American would rather see someone suffer than get the help they need. This is a particularly strong mindset ironically among the conservative religious, but there are plenty of liberals who think that way too. This country needs reform on so many systems…

    • ParsnipWitch@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      What are “real” solutions, in your opinion? What do you feel should be done for the victims and their loved ones and family?

      • BluJay320
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Nothing can really be done for them. Locking him up won’t do anything for them, either. One could argue for some form of restitution, but then you’d have to ask if they even want anything from the guy.

        The real solutions are adequate mental healthcare and access to medication, as well as routine monitoring and check-ins. All following an extensive inpatient treatment and rehabilitation program… So, basically what they’ve done here. Fighting pain with more pain doesn’t do anyone good. It’s entirely reactionary. Locking someone up for life does not help anyone.

        Helping the person get the treatment they so desperately need does.

        • ParsnipWitch@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I am not talking abou the perpetrators, though. I wanted to know what should be done to care for the victims of violent crimes.

          • BluJay320
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Like I said - restitution.

            Locking someone up doesn’t do anything for the victims or their families…

            Also, just take a look at wrongful conviction rates - and that’s just the confirmed ones… How many do we miss?

            Are we really willing to let so many innocent people be locked away or even killed? Debts can be repaid for a wrongful conviction, but a prison sentence cannot, and a death sentence- well, duh.

            Again, like I’ve said - and I feel like a broken record with this - prison does not help anyone. If anything, it makes things worse. I mean, you’re really gonna try to tell me that locking a bunch of convicts together for years or decades at a time and then just dropping them back into society once they’re done is a good idea??? No.

            Help. Support. Therapy. Proper monitoring and, if necessary, medication. THAT helps. Don’t look at the “what”, look at the “why”.

            We need to STOP the cycle of institutionalization, and START reforming people into productive members of society.

            Also, it’s way fuckin cheaper on the taxpayers, if that’s what you care about

            • ParsnipWitch@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I only care for the victims and I still didn’t get an answer. “Restitution”, what does that entail in detail? What’s your concrete plan of action to help the victims of violent crimes? How do you stop them from getting revenge? How do you handle them if they do take revenge? What happens with criminals who are repeat offenders? What about those were people know they plan an attack on someone?

              People like you pretend to care for people but I never get an answer to these questions. Victims are blissfully ignored in your crusade to help and protect violent criminals. It’s just an interesting observation you can make all the time.

              • BluJay320
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                estitution (noun):

                1. the restoration of something lost or stolen to its proper owner.

                2. recompense for injury or loss.

                3. the restoration of something to its original state.

                Didn’t think I had to spell it out for you…

                Obviously in this circumstance it would be definition number 2.

                • ParsnipWitch@feddit.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  What kind of recommendation do you suggest if someone eats your husbands brain for example, or rapes you? What if someone wants, as decompensation, that the other person suffers as much as they did? What if they want a sum of money the person can not pay? What if they want the person to go to prison for life?