Inspired by this Jon Bois video where body builders argue about the number of days in a week.

PLEASE be sure to include a link or screen cap.

Edit: thanks to 18107 for a li k to the original

    • DrQuint@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I’m quite sure the artist is winning that one. He’s riling up so many people by just repeating a single phrase.

      Like, anyone who thinks he’s serious is really not yet fit for the Internet.

      • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It’s my favorite argumentative tactic. I’ve been in a months long debate with youtube losers about whether one of every Pokemon would beat 1,000,000,000 (one billion) lions

          • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            I am, because for all the effort people put into copying and pasting pokedex entries, I can simply reply with “but a billion lions is a lot of lions, it’s too many lions” and get another dozen replies

            • Steeve@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              Whatever floats your boat man, I guess I just don’t get how being an internet troll brings joy

              • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                1 year ago

                It’s just funny seeing people work themselves up over someone thinking a wrong thing about a video game. It’s not like I’m harassing people or anything

        • MomoTimeToDie@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          The only interesting debate of pokemon vs lions is which pokemon are capable of individually coming out on top. Because at least 4 pokemon possess the individual ability to bring an end to reality itself. All 1000+ is an easy clap

          • DrQuint@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Which ones are you thinking? I had 6.

            I thought of Arceus, a fully powered up Necrozma, Yveltal, Dialga and Palkia. All of them could obliterate (or just reap life out of) the lions using nothing but their known innate abilities.

            Sixth one is either form of Hoopa, who can just make interdimentional holes of any size even at a range and without being present, and thus can both move themselves and the lions anywhere they want at will (so, lions into the sun, themselves into a real life resort in Miami with self-serve mojitos)

            But those are just the “quick” ones. Literally any pokemon who is conceivably immune to the lions wins by default. Just takes a long time. Like, Registeel and Regice are both known to endure absurd pressures and temperatures, so it’s only a question of how long it takes for them to punch through the pile.

            • MomoTimeToDie@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              The 4 I mentioned that can just terminate reality itself are the sinnoh quartet, and ultra necrozma is a close contender since it can create a state of entropy, which made ultra space almost uninhabitable, and soon to be a cold void without intervention.

              Yveltal and hoopa are easy wipes as you said, and I’d add in zygarde, kyogre, groudon, and rayquaza as fairly easy contenders with the ability to significantly shape the earth’s environment. For the sake of rounding out a trio, let’s toss in xerneas since it can power the ultimate weapon just as well as Yveltal.

              There’s a pretty solid case for all the unova dragons to solo easy, given they all have the power to effect the entire region.

              Basically every other unmentioned legendary or mythical would realistically win, just through power alone, albeit not quick, as you said. Beyond that, any pokemon that live in either the upper atmosphere or under water can just long game it and pick lions off slowly while the lions can’t actually touch them in any meaningful capacity. A lot of rock and steel types have a good chance simply because they’re hard to hurt for animals without magic superpowers, same goes for ghost types capable of becoming intangible for sustained amounts of time.

              • DrQuint@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Yveltal is more a direct win than Xerneas because Yveltal, canonically, can cause a self-feeding Anihilation Event on all life when it itself dies. It’s even brought up on the latest dex entry as game-canon confirmation.

                So imagine it is fighting and somehow loses, gets crushed by a billion lions - the lions will all then immediately start fading away into a sphere of doom that expands to consume all of then, and then retracts back down to generate an egg. It’s a tie. At least, it’s one until a short while later when Yveltal births again.

                Yes, the ultimate weapon in Gen 6 is basically just a way of using both Xerneas’ and Yveltal’s powers as one. But for the purposes of beating a billion lions, really, Yveltal is the important component. That was why I only put it up.

                Ghost types

                Hadn’t even considered that. Good call. Ghosts on the whole could also easily be stall wins.

          • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            It’s really hard to tell on the internet. I saw no indication it wasn’t just a guy that wasn’t sure and did no further research after being firmly told they are smooth, actually.

  • Rottcodd@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    58
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Years ago, on IMDb, a poster called rabbitmoon kept a thread going for years on the Rambo board that is still the best I’ve ever seen.

    The whole thing started with him posting that he was shocked when, about a third of the way through the movie, there was a scene in which a character was shot with a bullet from a gun. Then he countered, completely earnestly and deadpan, every response he got.

    The original thread is long gone, and the only thing I could find of it is an excerpt that was posted on Reddit - LINK

    • Vode An@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      1 year ago

      The IMDB forums should have been protected by UNESCO. I will not elaborate.

    • Vode An@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      1 year ago

      It gets better every time

      During this film, there is a scene where for a few frames, a person is depicted as having been shot, by a bullet from a gun to the chest.

      • Rottcodd@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah - I used to check in on it from time to time, and there were always new responses, and new people trying to argue with him, and he’d just run them in circles with hilariously overly literal (mis)interpretations of whatever they said. It went on for years.

        I’m pretty sure I remember the admin deleting part of it while it was still active, and eventually deleting it entirely. It’s a shame - it should’ve been saved for posterity.

  • N00b22@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 year ago

    Any argument from /r/BanVideoGames is fun lol. People don’t realize it’s satire and it becomes the funniest part of that subreddit 😂

    • Vode An@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      That sounds promising. What are the odds it’s been taken over by “true believers”? That seems to be the fate of any long-running satire on Reddit. TheDonald, most infamously.

      • N00b22@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think some people could think it’s not satire but that’s because there is a rule saying “we are not satire”. Guess what? That rule is satire too

          • N00b22@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Because:

            1. They pretend words like Karen or Boomer are slurs

            2. They censor the words g#me, g#mer and videog#me

            3. They say Hitler invented videogames in 1939

            4. Most of their proof is photoshopped images (example)

            5. Most of the users active in that sub are actually also active in gaming subreddits

            6. They call their subreddit a “facebook group”

      • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        I refuse to believe TD was ever insincere. I think sane people are just unfamiliar with how willfully stupid fascists sound as a form of cover.

        The leader of the KKK refers to themselves as wizards and dragons.

      • wombatula@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        What website are you on lmao? Reddit is constantly mentioned, nearly every instance is majority Reddit refugees, there are Reddit repost bots on multiple instances.

          • wombatula@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            I really don’t think you understood me there.

            I am mocking your claim that “nobody mentions reddit”, those repost bots are definitely not one of the main complaints maybe one of the top 5 or 10 tops, and nobody cares about mentioning reddit stop being a baby.

            More clear?

      • wombatula@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        They were playing a game of Hedbanz / Headbands / Celebrity , and one of them had The Good Witch Glinda from Wizard of Oz as their character, and they are arguing about them not guessing it based on the clues.

        SHE CAME DOWN IN A BUBBLE DOG!!!

      • deadh34d@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        They’re arguing about the Wizard of Oz. I’m pretty sure this video is older than Frozen.

        • Anony Moose@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah, but I thought he was drawing a parallel between Wizard of Oz and something else, i.e. Elsa is the wicked witch of the East. If it’s older than Frozen, then it’s probably not that!

  • legion@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    There’s a reason it’s called “bodybuilding” and not “brainbuilding”.

  • Call me Lenny/Leni@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    A little context must go into this one. For three years now, Wix has owned DeviantArt, having acquired it from its original managers. Wix then redesigned DeviantArt to have a more modern functionality, referred to as DeviantArt Eclipse. A part of this functionality is that people on DeviantArt are (supposed to be) notified whenever someone posts a work similar to their own on any website across the internet, even on the dark web, as an originality-based precaution. As a side note, I wouldn’t say DeviantArt is doing the best it has ever done, but I wouldn’t call it bad, but “pessimist culture” would disagree, and there are those who say the feature I mention is irreputable.

    One day, a certain someone signed up for Wix and started putting art on there instead of DeviantArt. It should be noted that you can be banned from DeviantArt but not Wix. It’s not usual, but I myself demonstrate this, probably because my “ban” was circumstantial and therefore intentionally made only partial (for this reason, look up my Lemmy username on DeviantArt, I’m not forgotten), but I’m only a second person here as far as Wix is concerned. Someone deep into this “pessimist culture” (I don’t know what else to call it) then noticed and made a complaint accusing me of bypassing DeviantArt’s detectors using their own parent website and nobody doing anything, even “with the premium service package”. I kind of laughed at this, it would be like saying you committed a bank robbery by asking to speak to the manager and then asking him nicely for all the money in the bank. You kind of have to question the ownership at that point. Needless to say the fishiest thing was the accusers.

  • stephywephy88@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I started reading your post 14 minutes ago and read 30 seconds every other minute then watched the video (but I didn’t count those minutes) and now I’ve grown chest hair. That was some good reppin

  • limelight79@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Years ago (early 2000s), Dilbert.com used to have a “Lazy Inventor” section of the website. “All Talk, No Funding.” This was fine for a while, then someone suggested “child free days [at restaurants and stores]”.

    You would have thought he’d suggested clubbing baby seals. The shitstorm it generated was legendary. I’m pretty sure that was a direct contribution to them disabling that feature a few months later.

    I found it in the Wayback machine! Unfortunately, it only grabbed the first few pages of comments, and the spice was only starting at that point.