For me it is the fact that our blood contains iron. I earlier used to believe the word stood for some ‘organic element’ since I couldn’t accept we had metal flowing through our supposed carbon-based bodies, till I realized that is where the taste and smell of blood comes from.

  • SoylentBlake@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Yo OP. We’re carbon based, which you accept. Diamond is stronger than almost all metal, and it’s pure carbon. Why wouldn’t we have metal in our veins? We atomically won that round before inflation was even over.

    I’m just playin, carbon under high enough pressure is metal too.

    Twice over, my favorite fact is that humanity has only existed during the time frames that the moon and the sun have been the same size in our sky, this allowing total eclipse - which is so obviously ridiculously rare I don’t see the point in quantifying with maths.

    I think it’s bizarre to think we have free will. Everywhere around us, in all our tech, tools, toys we see the realities of determinism. Cause and effect. To think that our minds are somehow not governed by this in a universe that unequivocally is is beyond Babel levels of arrogance.

    Beyond that, the idea that’s gaining ground about shared consciousness I find really intriguing. Rather fascinating stuff.

    Consciousness is the biggest mystery of the all, after all.

    • exi@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m mostly with you except for the determinism. Not only do we KNOW that the universe is fundamentally probabilistic and not deterministic, all our technology works extremely hard to combat random errors because small electronics are absolutely not deterministic, they are just engineered to have a low enough randomness so we can counteract it.

      • Rikudou_Sage@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Did something change? Last time I checked we didn’t know whether in the grand scale the universe is or isn’t deterministic.

        That we know that the universe isn’t (seemingly) deterministic locally doesn’t change anything about that.

        • Adalast@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m pretty sure it is essentially that any propensity the macro-scale universe has for the appearance of determinism is an illusion since the fundamental scales of the universe and everything it is built on are probabilistic. Nothing built on probabilistic foundations can be deterministic. It can appear to be. In large enough samples the law of large numbers smooths all the chaos out, but that is all our world is. Mathematically smoothed chaos. We as a species have known that for a very long time, but it has only begun to permeate the social zeitgeist in recent years and there is still a lot of pushback from certain sections of society.

        • dudinax@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          The best theories are non-deterministic, but of course we don’t know if they are the last word about reality. To put it another way, we don’t know why the math is non-deterministic in our best equations.

          The old equations were deterministic, but they turned out to be wrong. Something similar may happen here.

      • blackbrook@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Allowing for quantum randomness does not help the free will argument. Randomness might be “free”, but it is certainly not but “will”.

        • exi@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          But it does. If the universe was deterministic, choice would be impossible because all outcomes would be predetermined.

          Quantum randomness may not directly provide free will but it does exclude determinism, which would make free will impossible.

          • blackbrook@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            This “choice” is just the manifestation what you are at that moment, the sum of everything that has influenced you up until this point. Whether that complex tangle of cause and effect was “determined” a million years ago or affected by random fluctuations the whole way, including a moment ago, doesn’t change anything. “Free will” just doesn’t make any sense, regardless of whether one considers predeterminism to be the alternative.

    • Rikudou_Sage@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      We don’t know whether the universe is deterministic, though. That’s the only slimmer of hope for free will we can have.

      • Samihazah@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        The fun thing is, even if we assume our consciousness isn’t entirely deterministic, the most reasonable alternative would be pure randomness.

        Which, in the end, makes absolutely no difference in the free will argument.