What an utter piece of shit.

  • MrBusinessMan@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Stop trying to tell a private citizen and businessman what he can and can’t do with his own business

    • Notyou@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      1 year ago

      When you have a contract with the federal government it comes with stipulations. Don’t “private citizen” this. It’s not a mom and pop store.

      • PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        But Starlink DIDN’T have a contract with the US government, DOD, or Ukraine government. That’s the point. And they went ahead and used it for guided munitions.

        Which is a violation of the terms of service and not what anyone at SpaceX had intended.

        Problem is, that’s exactly how they ended up being used!

        • Burninator05@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          You’re tracking that Starlink sells service directly to the US military for activities that aren’t exactly tickle parties right?

          • yaaaaayPancakes@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            True, but didn’t Starshield happen after this stuff? I guess I need to relook at the timeline. But as I remember things, he started tossing starlink access at Ukraine, tried to get DoD to pay, they chose not to. Then he started to these games, and after that DoD started paying up. Starshield was announced a little bit after that.

    • sirjash@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 year ago

      Where do you draw the line? Should he also be allowed to sell his services to Russia? Should private companies from the US be allowed to sell arms to Russia?

      • Zagorath@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        1 year ago

        Never mind that. Let’s suppose he can sell his services to whomever he likes.

        What about the privacy implications? How did he know that specific attack was planned? Can he just listen in on any communication going across Starlink? I don’t think anyone should be okay with that.

        • PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Since he runs Starlink, he has a map of where every single Starlink receiver is located. Literally, a real time map with GPS coordinates.

          Russia would kill to have that info.

          However, musk also hack and jam proofed Starlink to help Ukraine too.

        • jarfil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          How did he know that specific attack was planned?

          Ukraine asked him to extend Starlink coverage for the attack.

          No conspiracy theory needed, they just told him.

      • Wilibus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m not sure where the line is but expecting a private citizen to provide vital defense infrastructure to your foreign allies and continually act in your best interests is clearly past it.

        • khannie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          The issue is removing infrastructure on your own personal whims when it goes against what your own tax payers are paying for, especially when they have funded your company / companies. It’s obscene.

          • jarfil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Except it wasn’t “removed”, he declined to “extend” it before getting paid by those tax payers.

        • Vespair@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          24
          ·
          1 year ago

          Nah, I’d rather attack the cancer that is capitalism at the source and work to rid the world of its scourge once and for all. Sorry you chose the loser’s side.

      • kava@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The whole reason this happened is because he disabled Starlink satellites over Russia in order to help the Ukrainian war effort. He just refused to turn it on for a specific offensive operation in Crimea that Ukraine requested - claiming he wanted to avoid escalation. Him and the US government were in agreement during time. Remember the US did not want to give tanks and planes because of fear of escalation.

        I don’t mean to try and put a damper on the 5 minute hate session but I wish people would make an effort to try and understand what is happening before they make all sorts of wild conclusions and statements.

          • jarfil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Is he? Did the US Government issue an order to attack Russian assets? Even Russian assets on Ukrainian soil? Even to support any Ukrainian effort to attack Russian assets?

            So far it’s been a “we give Ukraine some stuff and intel, and let them do the fighting while keeping a semblance of plausible deniability”.

            Sounds more like a direct involvement in the attack, would’ve been undermining the US Government.