• Heresy_generator@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Do you say the same thing to couples conceiving naturally; that natural conception should be second to adoption?

          Because if you don’t, you would be the one discriminating.

              • Cabrio@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                In my original comment. Because I don’t discriminate you’ll notice that I didn’t specify who should choose adoption, that means everyone should. I get that are you just being disingenuous because you’ve never seen someone with conviction of morals before, but please, try to catch up.

    • SCB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      Better idea: raise all children in a creche until they’re 10, then have couples draft them like a fantasy football team.

      • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I want to moneyball that bitch. Get twenty kids whose expected value is higher than their sale value. While you yuppies will be bankrupt buying one genius kid I will have twenty smart kids for the same price turning out code and content.

    • hungryphrog
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Do you know how complicated and long an adoption process is? Sure, it would be awesome if people adopted kids instead of making more, but adoption will not be a viable option for most people until that mess is somved.

  • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m confused why is this historic I’m positive this has happened before. Why would the sexual orientation have anything to do with whether or not IVF would work.

    I don’t get it.

    • Xtallll
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      The article isn’t about a scientific advancement, but a discussion of the limits on human rights in South Korea. “While South Korea has not yet legalised same-sex marriage, and sperm banks in the country are only accessible to heterosexual married couples, the pair were able to tie the knot in New York in 2019, and receive IVF treatment in Europe.”