In a carefully planned overnight heist, thieves cut through a safe and stole more than $1.3 million worth of jewelry from a store outside Chicago, the store owner said.

The burglars worked for nearly five hours during the night of May 9-10, 2025, disabling Internet service to the entire office complex where Rick Kleinvehn Diamond Brokers in South Barrington, Illinois, is located before breaking into the store, according to store owner Rick Kleinvehn.

South Barrington is about 45 minutes outside Chicago.

“They used a wet saw, and the interior where the safe was became all slushy, muddy, just kind of a goo on the floor from them cutting for hours and hours through that steel,” Kleinvehn told ABC News. “They had buckets, and they were filling buckets and pouring it on the hot metal.”

  • mercano@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 hours ago

    My first thought: if you’re going to spend half the night sawing into a safe, why not rob a bank instead? Cash would be easier to launder than jewels. My second thought: How much cash do banks even keep on hand these days, with cashless payments becoming more and more common?

    • That was a relatively cheap, shitty little safe. Sawing through it took a relatively short time. A safe 3x thicker, with higher build quality, and better security would have required far more than one night to rob and far longer to plan.

    • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Came to say the same. Unless you’ve got a good fence, you’re losing a ton of value. Guess it’s decent meth money.

    • HubertManne@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      11 hours ago

      This is why I can’t do crime. There are to many folks willing to do it for way less. I was just thinking that at most they get half value and then its split between however many. No thank you.

        • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          9 hours ago

          I can empathize with having my stuff taken, but if you had $1.3 million in jewels, I’m going to bet you’re still better off than almost everyone I know even after the theft. This is a minor inconvenience, and that’s before we even begin to discuss the ethical implications of the jewelry trade.

  • Steve@communick.news
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    The burglars worked for nearly five hours during the night of May 9-10, 2025

    But today is the 7th.
    I’m confused.

    It’s JUNE now!!??

  • Tylerdurdon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    11 hours ago

    So now just go donate half to the ultra corrupt Cheeto and get you a pardon. That’s how the “law” is working now, right?

  • MushuChupacabra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    13 hours ago

    If you look at the pic closely, you can see the subtle breach of the safe wall and door. Look at the irregularities at the corner of the safe.

    • psud@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      The usual rule is 10%, jewellers can’t get insurance if they don’t spend at least 10% of the value on security. Though this safe resisted power tools for 5h. That’s not bad. If the alarm system has been battery backed up and connected over the cell phone network the thieves wouldn’t have been successful

      • ShoeThrower@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        26 minutes ago

        Yeah, they very obviously did not pay 130k for the box alone, and I’d guess it’s not insurable for the value it held. It also doesn’t seem to be in an armored room or vault, and their security system didn’t even go off. Not clear where that budget went, unless the owner is also paying themselves as a PT security guard, lol.

        The walls of the safe are quite thin and it could have been opened in a few minutes had they used the right tools in the right places. Even “proper” safes insurable for this amount of value, are only rated to resist tools for 30-60 minutes.

        Seriously, even $20k safes are MUCH beefier than whatever this is/was, and might actually justify 5 hrs.

        • psud@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          It took 5 hours to break enough to get the loot out. That’s pretty good. The secure stuff in my government office is only rated for 3hrs against power tools

  • QuarterSwede@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    13 hours ago

    disabling Internet service to the entire office complex Crappy alarm monitoring service to not have that checked out, unless they told the manager/owner and they dismissed it. Doesn’t say.

    • Mayor Poopington@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Definitely should have been an alarm call. Back when I had alarm access at an old job, one camera had power issues, which prompted a call from the alarm company at 3 am. For about a week straight until it got fixed.

  • nimble
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Anyone else got the sudden itch to play payday 2?

    • pageflight@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      Like, wherever the latch(es) is/are?

      They cut through a wall to reach the safe, sounds like some inside knowledge anyway.

    • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      Assuming this isn’t insurance fraud, more than likely it’ll all be melted down for the precious metal content. Diamonds famously have no resale value, and gems in general are too easily tracked if there’s any lab grown used in any of the pieces.