• seeigel@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    26 minutes ago

    None. I rather change myself than wasting time on changing something that won’t last forever anyway.

  • greedytacothief@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I live in a pretty mountainous area, but I can think of a couple blind corners on small hills near me. So probably the one on the way to the bakery while running or biking.

    But I do a lot of ski touring so I’d rather die on one of the big ones.

  • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Anyone who puts always-on blue LEDs in electronics deserve the oubliette. People who put such LEDs in electronics meant for the bedroom deserve an oubliette that’a slowly filling with water.

    • Tenderizer78@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Or just excessively bright LEDs. Just because LEDs are super efficient, doesn’t mean they should take them as bright as they can go.

    • JackbyDev@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Allow me to try and persuade you. The problem is bright blue LEDs. It’s still stupid that they make them so bright, but the problem isn’t the color. A hypothetical bright red, green, or amber LED would also be a problem.

      • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        This is fair. I have had to put tape over a red alarm clock because it was too bright before. Those manufacturers also get the oubliette

      • deathbird@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Shorter wavelengths hit different though. That’s why we have blue light filtering glasses, Redshift, etc.

    • Wilco@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Are you for or against it? I mean, it does have it’s uses.

      • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 hours ago

        For it. Its lack of use in a union contract was a factor in a court ruling some years back. That’s when it went from pedantry to real-world consequence for me. Something was ruled similar to A and B rather than A or B.

  • superniceperson@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    19 hours ago

    There absolutely was a cornucopia in the fruit of the loom logo. That is the sole reason I know what a cornucopia is. It wasn’t on any table or in any thanksgiving decoration in my childhood, it isn’t a popular thing to exist in media, it was an obscure item that was a main part of an underwear logo.

    Anyone that says differently is objectively wrong. I don’t know why the logo changed and why besides a patent entry even the company itself denies it. I don’t really care if this is an alternate earth or aliens or time travellers or an entirely natural quirk of existing in a quantum universe, but I know for an absolute fact the sole reason I know what a cornucopia is is because of my underwear, and not because my dick is coincidentally called the horn of plenty.

  • the_riviera_kid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    74
    ·
    1 day ago

    Appliances and cars should never have an internet connection for any reason.

    Also fuck touch screens give me buttons.

  • Salamander@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    20 hours ago

    The split between “Today” and “Tomorrow” is at midnight, not when one sleeps/wakes up.

    This comes up often after midnight when my girlfriend asks me about “tomorrow”. Why discuss breakfast for tomorrow when we still haven’t had breakfast today??

    • Jarix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      50 minutes ago

      I guess my hill is to fight you on this.

      They current day isnt over until you wake up, or the sun comes up

    • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      Must disagree. If today ended at midnight, then my streak of watching at least one episode of a TV show every single day would have been broken years ago. No, today ends when I go to sleep, even if it’s at noon on what is your tomorrow

    • call_me_xale@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Some computer nerd friends and I came up with a solution for this:

      Computer architectures typically provide separate instructions for “logical” and “arithmetic” bit-shifts. The details as to why aren’t important, but we can borrow the nomenclature.

      When referring to “tomorrow” in the sense of “when I wake up from my next sleep cycle”, use “logical tomorrow”. When referring to “tomorrow” in the sense of “after midnight tonight”, use “arithmetic tomorrow” (or “chronological tomorrow”, if you really want to be pedantic).

      • Salamander@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        50 minutes ago

        Our relationship is built on tiny hills to die on. Of course, it is always playful 😜

        She will use a common grammatical construction in Spanish (“a por”) that became technically correct in Spain (where she is from) long after the conquest. I am from Mexico, where that construction is not used (we don’t insert the “a” before “por”). So, when she uses “a por” I act like I don’t understand and argue that it is not in the spanish her ancestors taught mine.