• obvs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        35
        ·
        6 天前

        I read today that one of his secretaries said that China had miscalculated, because China exports roughly four times as much to the U.S. as the U.S. imports to China, and he said that that makes the U.S. a lot stronger than China, that it would give the U.S. a better bargaining position.

        That’s like a wealthy family in a small town saying they can outlast the grocery store if the grocery store decides to stop selling food to you.

        I mean, good luck with that

    • djsoren19
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      ·
      6 天前

      The 4% is what really sends me. I understand it’s just coming from their new nonsensical 34% tariffs but just…you’re already doubling the cost wtf is the point of the extra 4%? Just go for a flashy round 100%, they can’t even be evil right!

  • katy ✨
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    91
    ·
    6 天前

    “haha take that” - donald trump, slamming his dick in the car door

    • floofloof@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      45
      ·
      edit-2
      6 天前

      When the UK had a Prime Minister stupid enough to tank the economy like this, she was gone before you could eat a lettuce. But she only hurt her own country’s economy, while Trump is doing worldwide damage. The USA needs to step up and get rid of this hopeless leader.

      • djsoren19
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        46
        ·
        6 天前

        The U.K.'s democracy is, unfortunately, several times more competently constructed than the U.S. democracy. Lizz Truss could be removed because there were avenues put in place to legally remove her from her position, there are no such avenues in the U.S. Here, the only way a sitting president can retire is via gunshot.

        • ToadOfHypnosis@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          6 天前

          Yeah, our “checks and balances” were designed poorly. The religious reverence placed on the constitution stopped it from evolving to be better. It needs a revamp on a major scale.

        • ✺roguetrick✺@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          6 天前

          Our vote of no confidence is impeachment. Same problem in regards to the party selecting the party leader in the UK. You actually have to have MPs/senators that actually agree.

          • djsoren19
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            18
            ·
            6 天前

            Until I see an impeachment actually result in the removal of a president, I don’t seriously believe it is a viable method. Trump has been impeached twice so far with no consequences, so forgive me for having zero confidence in the third time being the charm.

            • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              6 天前

              At this point the only way it’d be possible is if one party controlled both chambers of congress. The current MAGA bunch would impeach and convict the next dem president for putting ketchup on their hotdog before mustard.

              Also Fox News was a direct response to Nixon so it would never happen again to a GOP president. They won.

          • Not_mikey@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            6 天前

            Yeah the problem isn’t in our government structure, in this case, but in the republican cult of personality.

            It sucks but the Republicans won a very narrow victory in the house senate and president. No matter what system you have, if it’s at all democratic that party makes all the decisions. The problem is there making the decision to standby and watch as a demented oaf flushes the country down the toilet

  • BlackSheep@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    6 天前

    OK. So China is going to retaliate. Because they can. It’s kind of watching a 5 card stud game, and Trump is bluffing. And everyone knows it 🤣

    • slaneesh_is_right@lemmy.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      6 天前

      I don’t know if americans themselves realise that their whole life revoles about shit they buy from china. But they will soon. When the garbage from temu is suddenly expensive garbage.

    • Sarie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      6 天前

      At this point I don’t think the Chinese need to retaliate. They could just say that they will and just wait for the US to put another bullet in their foot.

    • pulsewidth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 天前

      Nah, he’s run out of feet to shoot - next shot is aimed for the groin.

      I do wish we could fast forward to the part where he Hitlers himself in a bunker.

  • BlackSheep@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    6 天前

    All Trump understands is “winning” or “losing”. He doesn’t understand negotiations. He doesn’t understand politics. It’s WIN or nothing.

  • BlackSheep@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    6 天前

    104%?? Seriously? What’s next? 175% tariffs. Trump, you fucking idiot. The rest of the world doesn’t need you.

    • katy ✨
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      6 天前

      they’re already screaming for 400% tariffs on china because republicans don’t give a fuck about the american people and the hurt they cause.

  • Boomer Humor Doomergod@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    6 天前

    How does this work from an implementation perspective? Is there a field on whatever software that does import taxes that they can tweak? Or is it just backdated from the date of import, based on the invoice?

    • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      6 天前

      With that question alone you’ve already put more thought into this than the person declaring these brain-dead tariffs.

    • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 天前

      I believe it’s paid as part of clearing customs. Since everything is in some capacity inspected (even if that just means checking the weight, container seals, and serial numbers in the freight container), that means there’s some record of what’s coming in and from where. At that point the importer pays customs the various fees and taxes before customs let’s them take the goods out of the port of entry.

      The importer would mark it down as part of the taxes that they paid on their purchase, but it would largely only matter so that they can appropriately indicate what portion of the purchase price was taxes that have already been paid so they don’t double pay later.

        • vividspecter@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          6 天前

          One of the vanishingly few benefits of not being a democracy, is that the people just can’t just vote in an idiot. Of course, there are other avenues for an idiot to take over an authoritarian government (historically, usually by war or inheritance).

    • fluxion@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      6 天前

      They’ll throw in a little Taiwan invasion for shits and giggles and fuck us on semiconductors too. And they’ll succeed, because Trump won’t lift a finger to defend Taiwan

      • baltakatei@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 天前

        At some point, prolonged US tariffs against Taiwan make rule by China and expulsion of US military assets there politically acceptable. Same argument applies to Japan and the Philippines.

  • Rose56@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    6 天前

    Say bye bye to Nintendo switch 2 pre-order. I wonder what the gamers will do? This is gonna end very bad!

    • vividspecter@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 天前

      I think it’s mainly Vietnam tariffs that will hit the Switch 2 (Nintendo moved manufacturing their to minimise tariffs in the first place). But they are harsh enough in their own right.

  • Libra00@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    6 天前

    What? I had a nap and Trump decided he liked tariffs and all but that he wasn’t tariffing hard enough so now he’s gonna double the price of all Chinese goods. Oh lawd. Guess I’m waiting a few years to build my next PC.

    • wirebeads@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      6 天前

      No way. You’ll totally be able to afford to get one tariff free from those new factories that are absolutely bigly being built right now in the great state of America.

      Everything should be up and running in a week or so. They just fast tracked all the tool and die makers needed to help develop the machines needed to build your next generation silicon and mother boards, and those ram chip thingies. To avoid all the tariffs from China they’re mining rare earth on mars and conveyor belted back on to America in the frunk of the swastitrucks.

      It’s everything computer.

      Believe in Trump, he believes in you. Or not.

      Most likely not. He doesn’t care about you. He only cares about charging the government insane amounts to his golf course so he can golf while messing up his presidential diapers and getting rich off your tax dollars while wearing pants pulled up to his orange cheetos nip nips.